B.S.A. Investors Ltd. et al. v. Mosly et al.

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
JudgeWilliamson, J.
Citation[2004] B.C.T.C. 1706 (SC),2004 BCSC 1706
Date22 December 2004

BSA Inv. Ltd. v. Mosly, [2004] B.C.T.C. 1706 (SC)

MLB headnote and full text

Temp. Cite: [2005] B.C.T.C. TBEd. JA.029

B.S.A. Investors Ltd. and Gang Ranch Ltd. (plaintiffs) v. Adel Mosly, Saudi Arabian-Canadian Business Corporation and Douglas Symes & Brissenden (defendants)

(S004649; 2004 BCSC 1706)

Indexed As: B.S.A. Investors Ltd. et al. v. Mosly et al.

British Columbia Supreme Court

Vancouver

Williamson, J.

December 22, 2004.

Summary:

This headnote contains no summary.

Barristers and Solicitors - Topic 2595.1

Negligence - Particular negligent acts - Re mortgages - See paragraphs 73 to 90.

Equity - Topic 3641

Fiduciary or confidential relationships - Breach of fiduciary relationship - General - See paragraphs 33 to 52.

Fraud and Misrepresentation - Topic 7

Fraudulent misrepresentation (deceit) - General principles - What constitutes fraud - See paragraphs 53 to 72.

Torts - Topic 61

Negligence - Causation - Causal connection - See paragraphs 90 to 106.

Cases Noticed:

Canadian Aero Service Ltd. v. O'Malley et al., [1974] S.C.R. 592; 40 D.L.R.(3d) 371, refd to. [para. 56].

Kostiuk (Bankrupt), Re, [1998] B.C.T.C. Uned. E17; 10 C.B.R.(4th) 303 (S.C.), refd to. [para. 59].

Athey v. Leonati et al., [1996] 3 S.C.R. 458; 203 N.R. 36; 81 B.C.A.C. 243; 132 W.A.C. 243, refd to. [para. 74].

Sinclair v. Smith (1982), 41 B.C.L.R. 374 (S.C.), consd. [para. 84].

Groves-Raffin Construction Ltd. v. Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, [1976] 2 W.W.R. 673 (B.C.C.A.), refd to. [para. 93].

American Wollastonite Mining Corp. v. Scott et al., [2002] B.C.T.C. 1010; 2002 BCSC 1010, refd to. [para. 95].

Snell v. Farrell, [1990] 2 S.C.R. 311; 110 N.R. 200; 107 N.B.R.(2d) 94; 267 A.P.R. 94, refd to. [para. 95].

Rainbow Industrial Caterers Ltd. et al. v. Canadian National Railway Co. et al., [1991] 3 S.C.R. 3; 126 N.R. 354; 3 B.C.A.C. 1; 7 W.A.C. 1, refd to. [para. 95].

Haag v. Marshall (1989), 39 B.C.L.R.(2d) 205 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 103].

Authors and Works Noticed:

Dunlop, Charles Richard Bentley, Creditor-Debtor Law in Canada (2nd Ed. 1995), p. 613 [para. 59].

Linden, Allen M., Canadian Tort Law (7th Ed. 2001), p. 110 [paras. 98, 101].

Counsel:

Daniel R. Bennett and Ryan P. Berger, for the plaintiffs;

Jack Webster and Paul D. Warnett, for the defendant, Douglas Symes & Brissenden;

The defendant, Adel Mosly appeared on his own behalf.

This case was heard on September 20-24 and 27-30, October 1 and November 22 and 23, 2004, before Williamson, J., of the British Columbia Supreme Court, who delivered the following decision on December 22, 2004.

Please note: The following judgment has not been edited.

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
4 practice notes
  • 2025 BCSC 1003
    • Canada
    • January 1, 2025
    ...or was failing to convey to them the solicitor's advice: Sinclair at para. 17. 182 In B.S.A. Investors Ltd. et al. v. Mosly et al., 2004 BCSC 1706 at paras. 86–87, rev'd on other grounds, 2007 BCCA 556, leave to appeal to SCC ref'd, 32148 (24 January 2008), Justice Williams cited Sinclair i......
  • Shortreed Joint Venture Ltd v Guvi
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • June 2, 2025
    ...or was failing to convey to them the solicitor's advice: Sinclair at para. 17. 182 In B.S.A. Investors Ltd. et al. v. Mosly et al., 2004 BCSC 1706 at paras. 86–87, rev'd on other grounds, 2007 BCCA 556, leave to appeal to SCC ref'd, 32148 (24 January 2008), Justice Williams cited Sinclair i......
  • B.S.A. Investors Ltd. et al. v. Mosly et al.
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • March 27, 2006
    ...even if the lawyer had met the required standard of care. [4] The trial judge's reasons, which can be found at [2004] B.C.J. No. 2686; 2004 BCSC 1706, set out the facts in detail; however, for the purposes of this appeal, the relevant business relationships may be summarized as follows: Gan......
  • B.S.A. Investors Ltd. et al. v. Mosly et al.
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • May 6, 2005
    ...edited. [1] Williamson, J. : This application arises out of Reasons for Judgment which were handed down on December 22, 2004, cited at 2004 BCSC 1706. In that judgment, I found the defendants liable to the plaintiffs in the amount of $550,675.00. I also allowed a counterclaim to the extent ......
3 cases
  • Shortreed Joint Venture Ltd v Guvi
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • June 2, 2025
    ...or was failing to convey to them the solicitor's advice: Sinclair at para. 17. 182 In B.S.A. Investors Ltd. et al. v. Mosly et al., 2004 BCSC 1706 at paras. 86–87, rev'd on other grounds, 2007 BCCA 556, leave to appeal to SCC ref'd, 32148 (24 January 2008), Justice Williams cited Sinclair i......
  • B.S.A. Investors Ltd. et al. v. Mosly et al.
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • March 27, 2006
    ...even if the lawyer had met the required standard of care. [4] The trial judge's reasons, which can be found at [2004] B.C.J. No. 2686; 2004 BCSC 1706, set out the facts in detail; however, for the purposes of this appeal, the relevant business relationships may be summarized as follows: Gan......
  • B.S.A. Investors Ltd. et al. v. Mosly et al.
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • May 6, 2005
    ...edited. [1] Williamson, J. : This application arises out of Reasons for Judgment which were handed down on December 22, 2004, cited at 2004 BCSC 1706. In that judgment, I found the defendants liable to the plaintiffs in the amount of $550,675.00. I also allowed a counterclaim to the extent ......