Burridge Estate v. Parker, 2020 NSCA 63
| Jurisdiction | Nova Scotia |
| Judge | Honourable Justice Carole A. Beaton |
| Citation | 2020 NSCA 63 |
| Docket Number | CA 494190 |
| Court | Court of Appeal of Nova Scotia (Canada) |
| Date | 07 October 2020 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
7 practice notes
-
Table of cases
...(1994), 131 NSR (2d) 181 (SCTD) ............................................................................ 539 Burridge Estate v Parker, 2020 NSCA 63 ........................................................... 543 Burris v Azadani, [1995] 4 All ER 802 (CA) ......................................
-
Specific Performance: Chattels, Shares, and Payment of Money
...business that carried interstate trucking certiicates). 41 Parker v Burridge Estate , 2019 NSSC 171. 42 Burridge Estate v Parker , 2020 NSCA 63 at paras 58–59. 43 Behnke v Bede Shipping Co , [1927] 1 KB 649 [ Behnke ]. 44 It has been said that a plaintif is prima facie entitled to speciic p......
-
Limbo Cove and Moore v. Fraser, 2020 NSSC 315
...and that damages would be an inadequate remedy (Parker v. Burridge Estate, 2019 NSSC 171 para. 125 upheld on appeal 2020 NSCA 63). Here the Defendant agrees that the licences are unique. [101] Fishing licences have been the subject of orders for specific performanc......
-
2023 BCSC 247,
...54 It is important to note that a trial judge is not required to review all of the evidence in the reasons: Burridge Estate v. Parker, 2020 NSCA 63 at para. 55 The scope for appellate review with respect to this issue is narrow as the Supreme Court of Canada noted in Van de Perre, 2001 SCC ......
Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
-
Limbo Cove and Moore v. Fraser, 2020 NSSC 315
...and that damages would be an inadequate remedy (Parker v. Burridge Estate, 2019 NSSC 171 para. 125 upheld on appeal 2020 NSCA 63). Here the Defendant agrees that the licences are unique. [101] Fishing licences have been the subject of orders for specific performanc......
-
2023 BCSC 247,
...54 It is important to note that a trial judge is not required to review all of the evidence in the reasons: Burridge Estate v. Parker, 2020 NSCA 63 at para. 55 The scope for appellate review with respect to this issue is narrow as the Supreme Court of Canada noted in Van de Perre, 2001 SCC ......
-
Redel v Redel,
...54 It is important to note that a trial judge is not required to review all of the evidence in the reasons: Burridge Estate v. Parker, 2020 NSCA 63 at para. 55 The scope for appellate review with respect to this issue is narrow as the Supreme Court of Canada noted in Van de Perre, 2001 SCC ......
-
Redel v. Redel,
...It is important to note that a trial judge is not required to review all of the evidence in the reasons: Burridge Estate v. Parker, 2020 NSCA 63 at para. [55] The scope for appellate review with respect to this issue is narrow as the Supreme Court of Cana......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
Table of cases
...(1994), 131 NSR (2d) 181 (SCTD) ............................................................................ 539 Burridge Estate v Parker, 2020 NSCA 63 ........................................................... 543 Burris v Azadani, [1995] 4 All ER 802 (CA) ......................................
-
Specific Performance: Chattels, Shares, and Payment of Money
...business that carried interstate trucking certiicates). 41 Parker v Burridge Estate , 2019 NSSC 171. 42 Burridge Estate v Parker , 2020 NSCA 63 at paras 58–59. 43 Behnke v Bede Shipping Co , [1927] 1 KB 649 [ Behnke ]. 44 It has been said that a plaintif is prima facie entitled to speciic p......