C.S. v. M.S.,
Jurisdiction | Ontario |
Judge | Goudge, MacPherson and MacFarland, JJ.A. |
Neutral Citation | 2010 ONCA 196 |
Date | 11 March 2010 |
Court | Court of Appeal (Ontario) |
C.S. v. M.S. (2010), 262 O.A.C. 225 (CA)
MLB headnote and full text
Temp. Cite: [2010] O.A.C. TBEd. MR.071
C.S. (applicant/respondent) v. M.S. (respondent/appellant)
(C46361; 2010 ONCA 196)
Indexed As: C.S. v. M.S.
Ontario Court of Appeal
Goudge, MacPherson and MacFarland, JJ.A.
March 16, 2010.
Summary:
The Ontario Superior Court, in a decision reported [2007] O.T.C. Uned. B25, granted custody of the divorced parties' youngest child to the mother, with no access to the father. The court also issued a restraining order forbidding the father to make contact with the mother or child. Finally, the court awarded the mother costs on a full recovery basis in the amount of $320,198.85, based in part on a finding of bad faith on the part of the father throughout the "long and acrimonious" litigation. The father appealed.
The Ontario Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal.
Editor's Note: Certain names in the following case have been initialized or the case otherwise edited to prevent the disclosure of identities where required by law, publication ban, Maritime Law Book's editorial policy or otherwise.
Family Law - Topic 1994
Custody and access - Access - Considerations in awarding access - Conduct of parents - The trial judge granted custody of the divorced parties' youngest child to the mother, with no access to the father - The other children lived with the father and were alienated from the mother as a result of "aggressive and persistent" steps from the father - The trial judge concluded that the risk that the youngest child would be exposed to alienation, if the father were given access, would be too great - In addition, the trial judge issued a restraining order forbidding the father to make contact with the mother or child - The Ontario Court of Appeal upheld the decision absent evidential error - In addition, the restraining order was a logical and necessary corollary to the no access order - See paragraphs 1 to 8.
Family Law - Topic 2032
Custody and access - Supplementary orders - Non-molestation, restraining orders, etc. - [See Family Law - Topic 1994 ].
Family Law - Topic 2189
Custody and access - Practice - Costs (incl. suit money or interim costs) - The trial judge granted custody of the divorced parties' youngest child to the mother, with no access to the father - The trial judge concluded that the risk that the youngest child would be exposed to alienation, if the father were given access, would be too great - The trial judge awarded the mother costs on a full recovery basis in the amount of $320,198.85, based in part on a finding of bad faith on the part of the father throughout the "long and acrimonious" litigation - The Ontario Court of Appeal upheld the costs award - The father's conduct of the litigation over several years and the simple reality of an 18-day trial led inevitably to huge lawyers' fees on both sides - The mother won at trial and was, therefore, entitled to costs - See paragraphs 9 to 12.
Cases Noticed:
K.V.P. v. T.E., [2001] 2 S.C.R. 1014; 275 N.R. 52; 156 B.C.A.C. 161; 255 W.A.C. 161, consd. [para. 4].
Counsel:
George Callahan, for the appellant;
Sheilagh O'Connell, for the respondent.
This appeal was heard on March 11, 2010, by Goudge, MacPherson and MacFarland, JJ.A., of the Ontario Court of Appeal. The Court of Appeal delivered the following decision on March 16, 2010.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (July 12-16)
...of Bias, Fresh Evidence, Courts of Justice Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. C.43, s. 112, Van de Perre v. Edwards, 2001 SCC 60, C.S. v. M.S., 2010 ONCA 196, A.M. v. C.H., 2019 ONCA 764, Godard v. Godard, 2015 ONCA 568, M.P.M. v. A.L.M., 2021 ONCA 465, R. v. Archer (2005), 203 O.A.C. 56 (C.A.), McGregor......
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (April 4, 2022 ' April 8, 2022)
...1 S.C.R. 759, Goldman v. Kudelya, 2017 ONCA 300, Children's Aid Society of Owen Sound v. R.D. (2003), 178 O.A.C. 69 (C.A.), S. v. M.S., 2010 ONCA 196, Van de Perre v. Edwards, 2001 SCC 60, V.S.J. v. L.J.G. (2004), 5 R.F.L. (6th) 319, (Ont. S.C.), Merkand v. Merkand, 2006 CanLII 3888 (Ont. C......
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (June 28-30)
...Toronto v. M. (C.), [1994] 2 S.C.R. 165, H.E. v. M.M., 2015 ONCA 813, leave to appeal refused, [2016] S.C.C.A. No. 63, C.S. v. M.S., 2010 ONCA 196, Van de Perre v. Edwards, 2001 SCC 60, A.M. v. C.H., 2019 ONCA 764, Leelaratna v. Leelaratna, 2018 ONSC 5983, M.M.B (V.) v. C.M.V., 2017 ONSC 39......
-
Ontario Court Of Appeal Summaries (September 3 6 2019)
...Joint Custody, Shared Custody, Civil Procedure, Appeals, Stay Pending Appeal, RJR-Macdonald v Canada (AG), [1994] 1 SCR 311, CS v MS, 2010 ONCA 196, Van de Perre v Edwards, 2001 SCC 60 Erland v. Ontario Ltd., 2019 ONCA 689 Keywords: Civil Procedure, Dismissal for Delay, Summary Judgment, Ru......
-
Jordan v. Stewart, 2013 ONSC 5037
...S.C.); Blustein v. Kronby , 2010 ONSC 1718, [2010] O.J. No. 1342; M. (A.C.) v. M. (D.) (2003), 67 O.R. (3d) 181 (C.A.); C.S. v. M.S. , 2010 ONCA 196, 76 R.F.L. (6th) 14; Chadha v. Chadha , 2006 ONCJ 345, 172 A.C.W.S. (3d) 863; Harrington v. Harrington , 2009 ONCA 190, 63 R.F.L. (6th) 274; M......
-
Catholic Children's Aid Society of Hamilton v. V. A, N. E. and M. E.,
...to enable him to do so. See paras 31, 32. [135] See also S.(C.) v. S.(M.), 2007 CarswellOnt 1267 at 65, affirmed 2010 ONCA 196, 2010 CarswellOnt 1493 at 5 where the Ontario Court of Appeal confirmed the alienation finding which had been made without expert evidence. ......
-
Fiorito v. Wiggins, 2015 ONCA 729
...quash the appeal of the 2011 Order. Accordingly, it is also worth recalling for father and mother what this court stated in C.S. v. M.S., 2010 ONCA 196, 76 R.F.L. (6th) 14 at para. It is not our task to retry the case; we must approach the appeal with considerable respect for the task facin......
-
Fletcher v. Thomas, [2014] O.T.C. Uned. 79
...with full recovery costs under sub-rule 24(11), not bad faith. The case of S.(C.) v. S.(M.) , [2007] O.J. No. 2164 (Ont. S.C.), affirmed 2010 ONCA 196, addresses the test. I do not find any intent to deceive or to inflict harm here by either party, or any clear examples of the other intenti......
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (July 12-16)
...of Bias, Fresh Evidence, Courts of Justice Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. C.43, s. 112, Van de Perre v. Edwards, 2001 SCC 60, C.S. v. M.S., 2010 ONCA 196, A.M. v. C.H., 2019 ONCA 764, Godard v. Godard, 2015 ONCA 568, M.P.M. v. A.L.M., 2021 ONCA 465, R. v. Archer (2005), 203 O.A.C. 56 (C.A.), McGregor......
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (April 4, 2022 ' April 8, 2022)
...1 S.C.R. 759, Goldman v. Kudelya, 2017 ONCA 300, Children's Aid Society of Owen Sound v. R.D. (2003), 178 O.A.C. 69 (C.A.), S. v. M.S., 2010 ONCA 196, Van de Perre v. Edwards, 2001 SCC 60, V.S.J. v. L.J.G. (2004), 5 R.F.L. (6th) 319, (Ont. S.C.), Merkand v. Merkand, 2006 CanLII 3888 (Ont. C......
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (June 28-30)
...Toronto v. M. (C.), [1994] 2 S.C.R. 165, H.E. v. M.M., 2015 ONCA 813, leave to appeal refused, [2016] S.C.C.A. No. 63, C.S. v. M.S., 2010 ONCA 196, Van de Perre v. Edwards, 2001 SCC 60, A.M. v. C.H., 2019 ONCA 764, Leelaratna v. Leelaratna, 2018 ONSC 5983, M.M.B (V.) v. C.M.V., 2017 ONSC 39......
-
Ontario Court Of Appeal Summaries (September 3 6 2019)
...Joint Custody, Shared Custody, Civil Procedure, Appeals, Stay Pending Appeal, RJR-Macdonald v Canada (AG), [1994] 1 SCR 311, CS v MS, 2010 ONCA 196, Van de Perre v Edwards, 2001 SCC 60 Erland v. Ontario Ltd., 2019 ONCA 689 Keywords: Civil Procedure, Dismissal for Delay, Summary Judgment, Ru......