Calow v. Calow, (1996) 141 Sask.R. 78 (CA)

JudgeTallis, Cameron and Jackson, JJ.A.
CourtCourt of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
Case DateFebruary 20, 1996
JurisdictionSaskatchewan
Citations(1996), 141 Sask.R. 78 (CA)

Calow v. Calow (1996), 141 Sask.R. 78 (CA);

    114 W.A.C. 78

MLB headnote and full text

Michael Neil Calow (appellant) v. Shelley Mae Calow (respondent)

(Appeal File No. 2174)

Indexed As: Calow v. Calow

Saskatchewan Court of Appeal

Tallis, Cameron and Jackson, JJ.A.

February 20, 1996.

Summary:

A trial judge varied spousal and child support. The decision was appealed.

The Saskatchewan Court of Appeal held that, given the fundamental disagreement between the parties as to the underlying facts and the shifting factual base, it could not pass upon the award. The court remitted the matter to the Queen's Bench, Family Law Division, for the hearing of viva voce evi­dence.

Family Law - Topic 4017

Divorce - Corollary relief - Maintenance and awards - Awards - Variation of peri­odic payments or lump sum award - A trial judge varied spousal and child support - The decision was appealed - The Saskatchewan Court of Appeal held that, given the fundamental disagreement between the parties as to the underlying facts and the shifting factual base, it could not pass upon the award - The court remitted the matter to the Queen's Bench, Family Law Division, for the hearing of viva voce evidence.

Counsel:

D. Mullord, for the appellant;

P. Bitz, for the respondent.

This appeal was heard on February 20, 1996, by Tallis, Cameron and Jackson, JJ.A., of the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal.

The decision of the Court of Appeal was delivered orally on February 20, 1996, and the following written reasons were delivered on March 4, 1996, by Jackson, J.A.

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 practice notes
  • Glarvin v. Glarvin, (1996) 148 Sask.R. 71 (CA)
    • Canada
    • Saskatchewan Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • 4 Septiembre 1996
    ...[para. 9]. Zaba v. Bradley (1996), 137 Sask.R. 295; 107 W.A.C. 295; 18 R.F.L.(4th) 1 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 11]. Calow v. Calow (1996), 141 Sask.R. 78; 114 W.A.C. 78 (C.A.), refd to. [para. Statutes Noticed: Divorce Act, R.S.C. 1985 (2nd Supp.), c. 3, sect. 5(1)(a) [para. 9]. Counsel: D.J.......
1 cases
  • Glarvin v. Glarvin, (1996) 148 Sask.R. 71 (CA)
    • Canada
    • Saskatchewan Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • 4 Septiembre 1996
    ...[para. 9]. Zaba v. Bradley (1996), 137 Sask.R. 295; 107 W.A.C. 295; 18 R.F.L.(4th) 1 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 11]. Calow v. Calow (1996), 141 Sask.R. 78; 114 W.A.C. 78 (C.A.), refd to. [para. Statutes Noticed: Divorce Act, R.S.C. 1985 (2nd Supp.), c. 3, sect. 5(1)(a) [para. 9]. Counsel: D.J.......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT