Campbell v. Ragona et al.
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Judge | Pearlman, J. |
| Citation | [2010] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1339 (SC),2010 BCSC 1339,[2010] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1339 |
| Date | 23 September 2010 |
| Subject Matter | TORTS,PRACTICE,DAMAGE AWARDS,DAMAGES |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
6 practice notes
-
Blizzard Uranium Corporation v Nathanson, Schacter & Thompson LLP
...principle, a client should not have to pay for fees paid “in consequence of [the] breach of their fiduciary duty”: Campbell v. Ragona, 2010 BCSC 1339 at para. 580. However, I do not accept that the defendants should be deprived of a reasonable fee for work done before the fiduciary breach a......
-
Goodwin v. Becker et al.
...The plaintiff cited several solicitor's negligence cases where damages were awarded for mental distress, including Campbell v. Ragona , 2010 BCSC 1339, where the Court discussed the issue as follows: [614] On occasion, courts in this country have awarded damages for mental distress or disap......
-
Adams et al. v. Sheane
...[49] Many of the applicable legal principles are summarized conveniently in the decision of Pearlman J. in Campbell v. Ragona , 2010 BCSC 1339: [86] In order to assess the damages caused by a lawyers' negligence in the conduct of litigation, a plaintiff must establish that had the lawyer ex......
-
Oz Optics Ltd. v. XL Insurance Company PLC
...below the standard of care. The plaintiffs cite Strother v. 3464920 Canada Inc., 2007 SCC 24, [2007] 2 S.C.R. 177 and Campbell v. Ragona, 2010 BCSC 1339 to support their [80] Disgorgement is a remedy that is intended to serve either prophylactic or restitutionary purposes. In Strother, at p......
Get Started for Free
6 cases
-
Blizzard Uranium Corporation v Nathanson, Schacter & Thompson LLP
...principle, a client should not have to pay for fees paid “in consequence of [the] breach of their fiduciary duty”: Campbell v. Ragona, 2010 BCSC 1339 at para. 580. However, I do not accept that the defendants should be deprived of a reasonable fee for work done before the fiduciary breach a......
-
Goodwin v. Becker et al.
...The plaintiff cited several solicitor's negligence cases where damages were awarded for mental distress, including Campbell v. Ragona , 2010 BCSC 1339, where the Court discussed the issue as follows: [614] On occasion, courts in this country have awarded damages for mental distress or disap......
-
Adams et al. v. Sheane
...[49] Many of the applicable legal principles are summarized conveniently in the decision of Pearlman J. in Campbell v. Ragona , 2010 BCSC 1339: [86] In order to assess the damages caused by a lawyers' negligence in the conduct of litigation, a plaintiff must establish that had the lawyer ex......
-
Oz Optics Ltd. v. XL Insurance Company PLC
...below the standard of care. The plaintiffs cite Strother v. 3464920 Canada Inc., 2007 SCC 24, [2007] 2 S.C.R. 177 and Campbell v. Ragona, 2010 BCSC 1339 to support their [80] Disgorgement is a remedy that is intended to serve either prophylactic or restitutionary purposes. In Strother, at p......
Get Started for Free
