Canada (Attorney General) v. Ennis,

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
Neutral Citation2021 FCA 95
Citation2021 FCA 95
Docket Number2021fca95
CourtCourt of Appeal (Canada)
Date01 January 0001
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
8 practice notes
  • Amer v. Shaw Communications Canada Inc., 2023 FCA 237
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Canada)
    • December 5, 2023
    ...of Citizenship and Immigration) v. Vavilov, 2019 SCC 65 (CanLII), [2019] 4 S.C.R. 653 at para. 83; Canada (Attorney General) v. Ennis, 2021 FCA 95 (CanLII), [2021] 4 F.C.R. 154, leave to appeal to SCC refused, 39800 (20 January 2022) at para. [61] As this Court has repeatedly held, reviewin......
  • Zavarella v. Canada (Attorney General), 2024 FC 87
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • January 19, 2024
    ...submitted, the standard of review of the Commission’s substantive decision is reasonableness: Canada (Attorney General) v. Ennis, 2021 FCA 95, [2021] 4 FCR 154, at paras 44, 46. The onus is on the applicant to demonstrate that the decision is unreasonable: Vavilov, at paras 75 and [3......
  • Afzal v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 1273
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • September 22, 2023
    ...(Canadian Pacific Railway Co at para 56). No deference is owed to the RAD in this regard (Canada (Attorney General) v Ennis, 2021 FCA 95 at para 45). The burden is on the applicant to demonstrate that the requirements of procedural fairness were not [31] Second, the RAD’s decision on......
  • Abdi v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 1322
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • October 3, 2023
    ...(Canadian Pacific Railway Co at para 56). No deference is owed to the RAD in this regard (Canada (Attorney General) v Ennis, 2021 FCA 95 at para 45). The burden is on the applicant to demonstrate that the requirements of procedural fairness were not [25] Second, the RAD’s decision on......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
8 cases
  • Amer v. Shaw Communications Canada Inc., 2023 FCA 237
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Canada)
    • December 5, 2023
    ...of Citizenship and Immigration) v. Vavilov, 2019 SCC 65 (CanLII), [2019] 4 S.C.R. 653 at para. 83; Canada (Attorney General) v. Ennis, 2021 FCA 95 (CanLII), [2021] 4 F.C.R. 154, leave to appeal to SCC refused, 39800 (20 January 2022) at para. [61] As this Court has repeatedly held, reviewin......
  • Zavarella v. Canada (Attorney General), 2024 FC 87
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • January 19, 2024
    ...submitted, the standard of review of the Commission’s substantive decision is reasonableness: Canada (Attorney General) v. Ennis, 2021 FCA 95, [2021] 4 FCR 154, at paras 44, 46. The onus is on the applicant to demonstrate that the decision is unreasonable: Vavilov, at paras 75 and [3......
  • Afzal v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 1273
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • September 22, 2023
    ...(Canadian Pacific Railway Co at para 56). No deference is owed to the RAD in this regard (Canada (Attorney General) v Ennis, 2021 FCA 95 at para 45). The burden is on the applicant to demonstrate that the requirements of procedural fairness were not [31] Second, the RAD’s decision on......
  • Abdi v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 1322
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • October 3, 2023
    ...(Canadian Pacific Railway Co at para 56). No deference is owed to the RAD in this regard (Canada (Attorney General) v Ennis, 2021 FCA 95 at para 45). The burden is on the applicant to demonstrate that the requirements of procedural fairness were not [25] Second, the RAD’s decision on......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT