Canada (Attorney General) v. Scow
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Court | Court of Appeal (British Columbia) |
| Judge | Fitch,Marchand,Voith |
| Citation | 2022 BCCA 275 |
| Date | 05 August 2022 |
| Docket Number | CA47656 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
8 practice notes
-
Canadian Society for the Advancement of Science in Public Policy v British Columbia
...given to a proposed class proceeding when considering whether to strike a claim under Rule 9-5(1)(a): Canada (Attorney General) v. Scow, 2022 BCCA 275 at para 85 [“ B. Overview: multiple grounds to strike 128 The plaintiff provided no specific submissions in reply to the strike application.......
-
The King v. Greenwood
...Canada (Health), 2012 FCA 322 at para. 9, citing Housen; Buffalo v. Canada, 2016 FCA 223 at para. 42; Canada (Attorney General) v. Scow, 2022 BCCA 275 at para. 76 [Scow]. A motion judge is to be afforded a wide berth in the duplication analysis, given the context-specific nature of the inqu......
-
Weisenburger v College of Naturopathic Physicians of British Columbia
...as the Yukon Court of Appeal); Myers v. Canada (Attorney General), 2022 BCCA 160 at para. 34; and Canada (Attorney General) v. Scow, 2022 BCCA 275 [ 38 Factually, Stewart, Northern Cross, and Greengen are more germane to the present scenario, in that the Court considered whether the pursuit......
-
Metlakatla First Nation v Prince Rupert Port Authority
...not an “artfully pleaded” but thinly disguised attempt to pursue a claim in an inappropriate forum”: Canada (Attorney General) v. Scow, 2022 BCCA 275 at para. 74. If it is, the claim must be struck: see e.g. Stewart v. Clark, 2013 BCCA 359; Weisenburger v. College of Naturopathic Physicians......
Get Started for Free
9 cases
-
Canadian Society for the Advancement of Science in Public Policy v British Columbia
...given to a proposed class proceeding when considering whether to strike a claim under Rule 9-5(1)(a): Canada (Attorney General) v. Scow, 2022 BCCA 275 at para 85 [“ B. Overview: multiple grounds to strike 128 The plaintiff provided no specific submissions in reply to the strike application.......
-
The King v. Greenwood
...Canada (Health), 2012 FCA 322 at para. 9, citing Housen; Buffalo v. Canada, 2016 FCA 223 at para. 42; Canada (Attorney General) v. Scow, 2022 BCCA 275 at para. 76 [Scow]. A motion judge is to be afforded a wide berth in the duplication analysis, given the context-specific nature of the inqu......
-
Weisenburger v College of Naturopathic Physicians of British Columbia
...as the Yukon Court of Appeal); Myers v. Canada (Attorney General), 2022 BCCA 160 at para. 34; and Canada (Attorney General) v. Scow, 2022 BCCA 275 [ 38 Factually, Stewart, Northern Cross, and Greengen are more germane to the present scenario, in that the Court considered whether the pursuit......
-
Metlakatla First Nation v Prince Rupert Port Authority
...not an “artfully pleaded” but thinly disguised attempt to pursue a claim in an inappropriate forum”: Canada (Attorney General) v. Scow, 2022 BCCA 275 at para. 74. If it is, the claim must be struck: see e.g. Stewart v. Clark, 2013 BCCA 359; Weisenburger v. College of Naturopathic Physicians......
Get Started for Free