Canada (Privacy Commissioner) v. Blood Tribe Department of Health

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
CourtSupreme Court (Canada)
JudgeMcLachlin, Beverley; Binnie, William Ian Corneil; Deschamps, Marie; Fish, Morris J.; Abella, Rosalie Silberman; Charron, Louise; Rothstein, Marshall
Citation2008 SCC 44,[2008] 2 SCR 574,294 DLR (4th) 385,[2008] ACS no 45,JE 2008-1398,67 CPR (4th) 1,EYB 2008-137487,[2008] SCJ No 45 (QL),[2008] CarswellNat 2244,376 NR 327,74 Admin LR (4th) 38
Docket Number31755
Date17 July 2008
Subject MatterCROWN,PRACTICE,EVIDENCE

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
113 practice notes
  • Harkat, Re, (2014) 458 N.R. 67 (SCC)
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • May 14, 2014
    ...N.R. 241; 43 O.A.C. 1; 36 Q.A.C. 161, refd to. [para. 128]. Blood Tribe Department of Health v. Privacy Commissioner (Can.) et al., [2008] 2 S.C.R. 574; 376 N.R. 327, refd to. [para. Statutes Noticed: Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, 1982, sect. 7 [para. 28]; sect. 24(1) [para. 77].......
  • Slansky v. Canada (Attorney General) et al., (2013) 449 N.R. 28 (FCA)
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Canada)
    • April 16, 2013
    ...357 ; 192 D.L.R.(4th) 315 (C.A.), refd to. [paras. 61, 314]. Blood Tribe Department of Health v. Privacy Commissioner (Can.) et al., [2008] 2 S.C.R. 574; 376 N.R. 327 ; 2008 SCC 44 , refd to. [paras. 66, R. v. McClure (D.E.), [2001] 1 S.C.R. 445 ; 266 N.R. 275 ; 142 O.A.C. 201 ; 200......
  • Douglas v. Canada (Attorney General) et al., (2014) 452 F.T.R. 1 (FC)
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • March 28, 2014
    ...2 S.C.R. 319; 352 N.R. 201; 2006 SCC 39, refd to. [para. 176]. Blood Tribe Department of Health v. Privacy Commissioner (Can.) et al., [2008] 2 S.C.R. 574; 376 N.R. 327; 2008 SCC 44, refd to. [para. R. v. Campbell (J.) and Shirose (S.), [1999] 1 S.C.R. 565; 237 N.R. 86; 119 O.A.C. 201, refd......
  • Federation of Law Societies of Canada v. Canada (Attorney General)
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • April 4, 2013
    ...N.R. 154; 214 O.A.C. 377; 2006 SCC 31, refd to. [para. 103]. Blood Tribe Department of Health v. Privacy Commissioner (Can.) et al., [2008] 2 S.C.R. 574; 376 N.R. 327; 2008 SCC 44, refd to. [para. 103]. Canada (Attorney General) v. Law Society of British Columbia - see Jabour v. Law Society......
  • Get Started for Free
96 cases
  • Douglas v. Canada (Attorney General) et al., (2014) 452 F.T.R. 1 (FC)
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • March 28, 2014
    ...2 S.C.R. 319; 352 N.R. 201; 2006 SCC 39, refd to. [para. 176]. Blood Tribe Department of Health v. Privacy Commissioner (Can.) et al., [2008] 2 S.C.R. 574; 376 N.R. 327; 2008 SCC 44, refd to. [para. R. v. Campbell (J.) and Shirose (S.), [1999] 1 S.C.R. 565; 237 N.R. 86; 119 O.A.C. 201, refd......
  • R. v. Fox
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • February 6, 2026
    ...Rights Commission), 2004 SCC 31, [2004] 1 S.C.R. 809; Canada (Privacy Commissioner) v. Blood Tribe Department of Health, 2008 SCC 44, [2008] 2 S.C.R. 574; Lavallee, Rackel & Heintz v. Canada (Attorney General), 2002 SCC 61, [2002] 3 S.C.R. 209; R. v. Campbell, [1999] 1 S.C.R. 565; Descô......
  • Federation of Law Societies of Canada v. Canada (Attorney General)
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • April 4, 2013
    ...N.R. 154; 214 O.A.C. 377; 2006 SCC 31, refd to. [para. 103]. Blood Tribe Department of Health v. Privacy Commissioner (Can.) et al., [2008] 2 S.C.R. 574; 376 N.R. 327; 2008 SCC 44, refd to. [para. 103]. Canada (Attorney General) v. Law Society of British Columbia - see Jabour v. Law Society......
  • Alberta (Information and Privacy Commissioner) v. University of Calgary
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • November 25, 2016
    ...context in Alberta. Cases Cited By Côté J. Applied: Canada (Privacy Commissioner) v. Blood Tribe Department of Health, 2008 SCC 44 , [2008] 2 S.C.R. 574; Dunsmuir v. New Brunswick, 2008 SCC 9 , [2008] 1 S.C.R. 190 ; referred to: R. v. McClure, 2001 SCC 14 , [2001] 1 S.C.R. 445 ; Lavall......
  • Get Started for Free
8 firm's commentaries
  • Reinforcing The Primacy Of Privilege
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • September 27, 2017
    ...Privilege, at pp. 315-16. See, for example, Pritchard; Canada (Privacy Commissioner) v. Blood Tribe Department of Health, 2008 SCC 44, [2008] 2 S.C.R. 574. Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act, R.S.A. 2000, c. F-25 Alberta IPC, at paras. 19-27 and 130-38 (per Abella J. disse......
  • Solicitor Client Privilege In Tax Matters
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • May 26, 2015
    ...relationship (Descôteaux v Mierzwinski [1982] 1 SCR 860, at para 71; Canada (Privacy Commissioner) v Blood Tribe Department of Health [2008] 2 SCR 574, at para 10 [Blood Tribe] ; Samson Indian Band v Canada, [1995] FCJ No 734, at para 8). However, communications made outside of that framewo......
  • Are You Asking The Right Questions When You Travel With Electronic Devices?
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • November 10, 2017
    ...to the proper functioning of the Canadian legal system. (Blood Tribe Department of Health v. Attorney General of Canada et. Al, [2008] 2 S.C.R. 574. The Supreme Court of Canada has repeatedly emphasized that solicitor-client privilege must remain "as close to absolute as possible and should......
  • Are You Asking The Right Questions When You Travel With Electronic Devices?
    • Canada
    • LexBlog Canada
    • November 9, 2017
    ...to the proper functioning of the Canadian legal system. (Blood Tribe Department of Health v. Attorney General of Canada et. Al, [2008] 2 S.C.R. 574. The Supreme Court of Canada has repeatedly emphasized that solicitor-client privilege must remain “as close to absolute as possible and should......
  • Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
  • Privileges, Protections, and Immunities
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law of Evidence. Eighth Edition
    • June 25, 2020
    ...7 at para 7. 79 Ibid at para 43. 80 Ibid at paras 2 and 71. See also Canada (Privacy Commissioner) v Blood Tribe Department of Health , [2008] 2 SCR 574 (concluding that solicitor-client privilege prevails over the statutory power of access to documents established in the Personal Informati......
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law of Evidence. Eighth Edition
    • June 25, 2020
    ...Canada (Privacy Commissioner) v Blood Tribe Department of Health, [2008] 2 SCR 574 ......................................................................................... 305 Canada v Harkat, [2014] 2 SCR 33 ..................................................................... 335 Canadia......