Canadian National Railway Company v. BNSF Railway Company, 2019 FC 281

CourtFederal Court (Canada)
Case DateMarch 07, 2019
JurisdictionCanada (Federal)
Citations2019 FC 281
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
10 practice notes
  • A Inc. v. Canadian Museum for Human Rights, 2022 FC 1115
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • July 26, 2022
    ...to govern the treatment of confidential information as between the parties. In Canadian National Railway Company v BNSF Railway Company, 2019 FC 281, the Court noted at para 10: Before discussing the legal test in Sierra Club, it is apt to clarify some nomenclature. As used herein, consiste......
  • Protective Orders Alive And Well In Canadian IP Litigation
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • March 16, 2020
    ...in Seedlings Life Science Ventures, LLC v. Pfizer Canada Inc., 2018 FC 956; Canadian National Railway Company v. BNSF Railway Company, 2019 FC 281; dTechs EPM Ltd v British Columbia Hydro & Power Authority, 2019 FC 539; and Paid Search Engine Tools, LLC v Google Canada Corporation, 2019......
  • 2019 Litigation Year In Review
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • February 20, 2020
    ...on Web, LLC v Soldan Fence and Metals (2009) Ltd, 2017 FC 858; Seedlings Life Science Ventures, LLC v Pfizer Canada Inc, 2018 FC 443 34 2019 FC 281 35 Ibid at para 4 36 Ibid at para 4 37 Ibid at para 6 38 Ibid at para 53 39 Ibid at paras 4, 46 40 2002 SCC 41 41 Ibid at para 9 42 Ibid at par......
  • Paid Search Engine Tools, LLC v. Google Canada Corporation, 2019 FC 559
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • May 1, 2019
    ...was relied upon in considering whether a protective order should be issued in Canadian National Railway Company v BNSF Railway Company, 2019 FC 281 at para 54, 303 ACWS (3d) 387, it was recognized that the “deleterious effects to the public” considered in the second part of the Sierra Club ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
  • A Inc. v. Canadian Museum for Human Rights, 2022 FC 1115
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • July 26, 2022
    ...to govern the treatment of confidential information as between the parties. In Canadian National Railway Company v BNSF Railway Company, 2019 FC 281, the Court noted at para 10: Before discussing the legal test in Sierra Club, it is apt to clarify some nomenclature. As used herein, consiste......
  • Paid Search Engine Tools, LLC v. Google Canada Corporation, 2019 FC 559
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • May 1, 2019
    ...was relied upon in considering whether a protective order should be issued in Canadian National Railway Company v BNSF Railway Company, 2019 FC 281 at para 54, 303 ACWS (3d) 387, it was recognized that the “deleterious effects to the public” considered in the second part of the Sierra Club ......
  • dTechs EPM Ltd. v. British Columbia Hydro & Power Authority, 2019 FC 539
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • April 29, 2019
    ...to consider and address the implications of a recent decision of this Court in Canadian National Railway Company v BNSF Railway Company, 2019 FC 281 [CNR]. [3] In CNR, both parties moved on consent for a protective order defining various restrictions on the handling of confidential document......
  • Engineers and Geoscientists Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 116 (Re),
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • March 8, 2022
    ...the Engineers. [80]        The decision of Canadian National Railway Company v. BNSF Railway Company, 2019 FC 281, confirmed that experts, who have been retained by a party and have obtained discovery material, are subject to the implied undertaking rule: ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
5 firm's commentaries
  • Protective Orders Alive And Well In Canadian IP Litigation
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • March 16, 2020
    ...in Seedlings Life Science Ventures, LLC v. Pfizer Canada Inc., 2018 FC 956; Canadian National Railway Company v. BNSF Railway Company, 2019 FC 281; dTechs EPM Ltd v British Columbia Hydro & Power Authority, 2019 FC 539; and Paid Search Engine Tools, LLC v Google Canada Corporation, 2019......
  • 2019 Litigation Year In Review
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • February 20, 2020
    ...on Web, LLC v Soldan Fence and Metals (2009) Ltd, 2017 FC 858; Seedlings Life Science Ventures, LLC v Pfizer Canada Inc, 2018 FC 443 34 2019 FC 281 35 Ibid at para 4 36 Ibid at para 4 37 Ibid at para 6 38 Ibid at para 53 39 Ibid at paras 4, 46 40 2002 SCC 41 41 Ibid at para 9 42 Ibid at par......
  • Canadian Patent Law: 2019 Year In Review
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • March 2, 2020
    ...Pliteq failed to establish the confidential nature of most of the documents. In Canadian National Railway Company v BNSF Railway Company, 2019 FC 281, ("CNR") despite the fact that the parties moved on consent for a protective order, Justice Locke dismissed the motion. The Sierra Club test ......
  • There And Back Again - Protective Agreements In The Federal Court
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • April 4, 2019
    ...take to keep their documents and information confidential during litigation. In Canadian National Railway Company v. BNSF Railway Company, 2019 FC 281 both parties sought a protective order defining the various restrictions on their confidential documents that were to be disclosed to the ot......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT