Canadian Pacific Railway Co. v. Zambri, [1962] SCR 739

Citation[1962] SCR 739, 34 DLR (2d) 654, 35 DLR (2d) 386, 133 CCC 1, 1962 CanLII 1 (SCC), 1962 CanLII 76 (SCC), [1962] SCR 609, 1962 CanLII 82 (SCC), [1963] SCR 64, [1962] SCR 729, 34 DLR (2d) 196, 38 WWR 701, [1962] SCR 746, [1962] SCR 664, 38 CR 52, 38 CR 115, [1962] SCJ No 48 (QL), 35 DLR (2d) 1, 35 DLR (2d) 140, 39 WWR (ns) 39, 1962 CanLII 78 (SCC), [1962] SCR 656, 1962 CanLII 520 (SCC), 62 DTC 1236, [1962] CarswellOnt 18, 1962 CanLII 88 (SCC), 35 DLR (2d) 212, 1962 CanLII 66 (SCC), 38 CR 48, 34 DLR (2d) 721, 1962 CanLII 11 (SCC), 1962 CanLII 13 (SCC), 1962 CanLII 16 (SCC), 34 DLR (2d) 399, 1962 CanLII 67 (SCC), 39 WWR (ns) 43, 35 DLR (2d) 49, 1962 CanLII 530 (SCC), [1962] SCJ No 60 (QL), 1962 CanLII 43 (SCC), [1962] SCR 564, 39 WWR (ns) 304, [1962] SCR 766, [1962] SCR 642, 40 CPR 9, [1962] SCR 570, 35 DLR (2d) 106, [1962] SCR 646, 1962 CanLII 44 (SCC), 133 CCC 57
CourtSupreme Court of Canada
JudgeKerwin, Patrick; Taschereau, Robert; Locke, Charles Holland; Cartwright, John Robert; Fauteux, Joseph Honoré Gérald; Abbott, Douglas Charles; Martland, Ronald; Judson, Wilfred; Ritchie, Roland Almon
JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
84 practice notes
  • THE RIGHT TOOL FOR THE JOB? FREEDOM OF ASSOCIATION UNDER PROVINCIAL HUMAN RIGHTS CODES.
    • Canada
    • University of New Brunswick Law Journal Nbr. 68, January 2017
    • January 1, 2017
    ...1016 [Dunmore], (7) While strikes are no longer forbidden under the common law (Canadian Pacific Railway Co v Zambri, [1962] SCR 609, 34 DLR (2d) 654, strikers could be and can still be liable for numerous torts. For a general and still relevant review, see IM Christie's seminal The Liabili......
  • R. v. REID, 2021 SKQB 42
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench for Saskatchewan
    • February 9, 2021
    ...The defence of involuntary intoxication in the context of drinking and driving offences was discussed in R v King, [1962] SCR 746, where the Supreme Court outlined the test as follows at page … when it has been proved that a driver was driving a motor vehicle while his ability to do so was ......
  • R. v. Macdonald, 2021 BCSC 371
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia
    • January 15, 2021
    ...v. Toews, [1985] 2 S.C.R. 119 at 124. Proof of the actus reus creates a rebuttable presumption as to the proof of mens rea: R. v. King, [1962] S.C.R. 746 at [86]        The leading case on the proof of impairment is R. v. Stellato (1993), 78 C.C.C. (3d) 380 (O.N.C.A.), aff’d [1994] 2 S.C.R.......
  • R. v. White (M.J.), [2012] A.R. Uned. 744
    • Canada
    • Alberta Provincial Court (Alberta)
    • October 22, 2012
    ...p. 7, ll. 18-29. 55. Transcript, p. 7, l. 34 – p. 8, l. 8. 56. Transcript, p. 11, l. 22 – p. 12, l. 5. 57. R. v. King , [1962] SCR 746, 35 DLR (2d) 386 [ King ]. 58. Ibid at para 63. 59. Ibid. 60. R. v. MacDonald , 2005 ABPC 133, [2005] AWLD 2967. 61. Ibid at para 48. 62. Regina v. King , [......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
82 cases
  • R. v. REID, 2021 SKQB 42
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench for Saskatchewan
    • February 9, 2021
    ...The defence of involuntary intoxication in the context of drinking and driving offences was discussed in R v King, [1962] SCR 746, where the Supreme Court outlined the test as follows at page … when it has been proved that a driver was driving a motor vehicle while his ability to do so was ......
  • R. v. Macdonald, 2021 BCSC 371
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia
    • January 15, 2021
    ...v. Toews, [1985] 2 S.C.R. 119 at 124. Proof of the actus reus creates a rebuttable presumption as to the proof of mens rea: R. v. King, [1962] S.C.R. 746 at [86]        The leading case on the proof of impairment is R. v. Stellato (1993), 78 C.C.C. (3d) 380 (O.N.C.A.), aff’d [1994] 2 S.C.R.......
  • R. v. Roche, (1985) 9 O.A.C. 391 (CA)
    • Canada
    • Ontario Ontario Court of Appeal
    • December 20, 1984
    ...C.C.C. 1; 4 D.L.R.(2d) 406; [1956] S.C.R. 640; Beaver v. The Queen (1957), 118 C.C.C. 129; [1957] S.C.R. 531; 26 C.R. 193; R. v. King (1962), 133 C.C.C. 1; 35 D.L.R.(2d) 386; [1962] S.C.R. 746. Blackstone made the point over two hundred years ago in words still apt: '... to constitute a cri......
  • R. v. Abel (A.D.), 1999 ABCA 74
    • Canada
    • Alberta Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • March 2, 1999
    ...rea before the onset of amnesia (i.e., when she had her first two drinks and decided to continue drinking). Cases Noticed: R. v. King (1962), 133 C.C.C. 1 (S.C.C.), refd to. [para. E.L. Greenspan, Q.C., and A. Wheeler, for the appellant; J.B. Hawkes, for the respondent. This appeal was hear......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • THE RIGHT TOOL FOR THE JOB? FREEDOM OF ASSOCIATION UNDER PROVINCIAL HUMAN RIGHTS CODES.
    • Canada
    • University of New Brunswick Law Journal Nbr. 68, January 2017
    • January 1, 2017
    ...1016 [Dunmore], (7) While strikes are no longer forbidden under the common law (Canadian Pacific Railway Co v Zambri, [1962] SCR 609, 34 DLR (2d) 654, strikers could be and can still be liable for numerous torts. For a general and still relevant review, see IM Christie's seminal The Liabili......