Canadian Pacific Railway Company v. Canada
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Citation | 2019 FC 1531 |
| Date | 29 November 2019 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
4 practice notes
-
Canadian Pacific Railway Company v. Canada,
...brought by the Plaintiff, and later the Defendant, respectively. Neither motion succeeded (see Canadian Pacific Railway Co v Canada, 2019 FC 1531 and Canadian Pacific Railway v Canada, 2020 FC 690 ). However, I also note that neither party opposed the experts’ qualifications prior t......
-
Sharma v Kim Spencer McPhee Barristers P.C.,
...following cases which have held that legislative context can be a surrounding circumstance: Canadian Pacific Railway Company v. Canada, 2019 FC 1531, at paras. 24–27 and Geophysical Service Incorporated v. Falkland Oil and Gas Limited, 2019 ABQB 162 at paras 65–66, aff'd 2020 ABCA 60 The CF......
-
Canadian Pacific Railway v. Canada,
...defences, argues estoppel. For greater detail on the broad parameters of the litigation, see Canadian Pacific Railway Company v Canada, 2019 FC 1531 [CPR 2019] at paras 3-13. [5] In the Fall of 2019, the Crown filed the Urban Report to “address the gaps” in CPR’s discovery answers, and stat......
-
Canadian Pacific Railway Company v. Canada,
...the Court already considered whether those experts were necessary in two pre-trial motions (Canadian Pacific Railway Company v. Canada, 2019 FC 1531; Canadian Pacific Railway v. Canada, 2020 FC 690 ; Canadian Pacific Railway Company v. Canada, 2020 FC 1058 ). [71] Neither will I accept th......
4 cases
-
Canadian Pacific Railway Company v. Canada,
...brought by the Plaintiff, and later the Defendant, respectively. Neither motion succeeded (see Canadian Pacific Railway Co v Canada, 2019 FC 1531 and Canadian Pacific Railway v Canada, 2020 FC 690 ). However, I also note that neither party opposed the experts’ qualifications prior t......
-
Sharma v Kim Spencer McPhee Barristers P.C.,
...following cases which have held that legislative context can be a surrounding circumstance: Canadian Pacific Railway Company v. Canada, 2019 FC 1531, at paras. 24–27 and Geophysical Service Incorporated v. Falkland Oil and Gas Limited, 2019 ABQB 162 at paras 65–66, aff'd 2020 ABCA 60 The CF......
-
Canadian Pacific Railway v. Canada,
...defences, argues estoppel. For greater detail on the broad parameters of the litigation, see Canadian Pacific Railway Company v Canada, 2019 FC 1531 [CPR 2019] at paras 3-13. [5] In the Fall of 2019, the Crown filed the Urban Report to “address the gaps” in CPR’s discovery answers, and stat......
-
Canadian Pacific Railway Company v. Canada,
...the Court already considered whether those experts were necessary in two pre-trial motions (Canadian Pacific Railway Company v. Canada, 2019 FC 1531; Canadian Pacific Railway v. Canada, 2020 FC 690 ; Canadian Pacific Railway Company v. Canada, 2020 FC 1058 ). [71] Neither will I accept th......