Canadian Pacific Railway Company v Kelly Panteluk Construction Ltd.
| Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan) |
| Judge | Ottenbreit, Caldwell and Barrington-Foote JJ.A. |
| Neutral Citation | 2020 SKCA 123 |
| Citation | 2020 SKCA 123 |
| Docket Number | CACV3372 |
| Date | 28 October 2020 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
14 practice notes
-
Bourgault Industries Ltd. v. Graham
...2018 SKCA 20 at paras 52-54, [2018] 5 WWR 111 [Onion Lake] and Canadian Pacific Railway Company v Kelly Panteluk Construction Ltd., 2020 SKCA 123 at para 59, 17 CLR (5th) 138 [93] Essentially, pleadings that impugn the integrity of the adjudicative functioning of the court would bring the a......
-
GHC Swift Current Realty Inc. v BACZ Engineering (2004) Ltd.
...664). That being so, it is reviewable on the discretionary standard (Canadian Pacific Railway Company v Kelly Panteluk Construction Ltd., 2020 SKCA 123 at para 43; CE Design Ltd. v Saskatchewan Mutual Insurance Company, 2021 SKCA 14 at para 49, 455 DLR (4th) 417). This means an appellate co......
-
Herold v Wassermann
...Mortgage Ltd. v Robertson (1984), 35 Sask R 84 at para 2 (CA); and Canadian Pacific Railway Company v Kelly Panteluk Construction Ltd., 2020 SKCA 123 at para 55, 17 CLR (5th) 138. [50] Although the RJR-MacDonald framework is applied by courts when considering whether to grant a stay in most......
-
BNSF Railway Company v. Greater Vancouver Water District
...para. 29, leave to appeal to SCC refused, 34213 (25 August 2011); Canadian Pacific Railway Company v. Kelly Panteluk Construction Ltd., 2020 SKCA 123 at para. 86; Greater Toronto Airports Authority v. Mississauga (City) (2000), 50 O.R. (3d) 641, 192 D.L.R. (4th) 443 (C.A.), leave to appeal ......
Get Started for Free
14 cases
-
Bourgault Industries Ltd. v. Graham
...2018 SKCA 20 at paras 52-54, [2018] 5 WWR 111 [Onion Lake] and Canadian Pacific Railway Company v Kelly Panteluk Construction Ltd., 2020 SKCA 123 at para 59, 17 CLR (5th) 138 [93] Essentially, pleadings that impugn the integrity of the adjudicative functioning of the court would bring the a......
-
GHC Swift Current Realty Inc. v BACZ Engineering (2004) Ltd.
...664). That being so, it is reviewable on the discretionary standard (Canadian Pacific Railway Company v Kelly Panteluk Construction Ltd., 2020 SKCA 123 at para 43; CE Design Ltd. v Saskatchewan Mutual Insurance Company, 2021 SKCA 14 at para 49, 455 DLR (4th) 417). This means an appellate co......
-
Herold v Wassermann
...Mortgage Ltd. v Robertson (1984), 35 Sask R 84 at para 2 (CA); and Canadian Pacific Railway Company v Kelly Panteluk Construction Ltd., 2020 SKCA 123 at para 55, 17 CLR (5th) 138. [50] Although the RJR-MacDonald framework is applied by courts when considering whether to grant a stay in most......
-
BNSF Railway Company v. Greater Vancouver Water District
...para. 29, leave to appeal to SCC refused, 34213 (25 August 2011); Canadian Pacific Railway Company v. Kelly Panteluk Construction Ltd., 2020 SKCA 123 at para. 86; Greater Toronto Airports Authority v. Mississauga (City) (2000), 50 O.R. (3d) 641, 192 D.L.R. (4th) 443 (C.A.), leave to appeal ......
Get Started for Free
