Canadian Pacific Railway Company v Kelly Panteluk Construction Ltd.,
| Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
| Judge | Ottenbreit, Caldwell and Barrington-Foote JJ.A. |
| Neutral Citation | 2020 SKCA 123 |
| Citation | 2020 SKCA 123 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan) |
| Date | 28 October 2020 |
| Docket Number | CACV3372 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 practice notes
-
GHC Swift Current Realty Inc. v BACZ Engineering (2004) Ltd.,
...664). That being so, it is reviewable on the discretionary standard (Canadian Pacific Railway Company v Kelly Panteluk Construction Ltd., 2020 SKCA 123 at para 43; CE Design Ltd. v Saskatchewan Mutual Insurance Company, 2021 SKCA 14 at para 49, 455 DLR (4th) 417). This means an appellate co......
-
Herold v Wassermann,
...Mortgage Ltd. v Robertson (1984), 35 Sask R 84 at para 2 (CA); and Canadian Pacific Railway Company v Kelly Panteluk Construction Ltd., 2020 SKCA 123 at para 55, 17 CLR (5th) 138. [50] Although the RJR-MacDonald framework is a......
-
Métis Nation – Saskatchewan v Saskatchewan (Environment),
...Canada & Co., 2011 SKCA 152 at para 41, [2012] 6 WWR 1; and Canadian Pacific Railway Company v Kelly Panteluk Construction Ltd., 2020 SKCA 123 at para 58, 17 CLR (5th) 138 [ Kelly Panteluk]. However, one factor that tilts toward the conclusion that a proceeding is abusive is where a par......
-
SHAW v. SHAW, 2020 SKQB 320
...Ottenbreit J.A., writing for the Court of Appeal in Canadian Pacific Railway Company v Kelly Panteluk Construction Ltd., 2020 SKCA 123 at para 58 (CanLII), reaffirmed that the doctrine of abuse of process is a flexible [58] The doctrine of abuse of process is a......
Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
-
GHC Swift Current Realty Inc. v BACZ Engineering (2004) Ltd.,
...664). That being so, it is reviewable on the discretionary standard (Canadian Pacific Railway Company v Kelly Panteluk Construction Ltd., 2020 SKCA 123 at para 43; CE Design Ltd. v Saskatchewan Mutual Insurance Company, 2021 SKCA 14 at para 49, 455 DLR (4th) 417). This means an appellate co......
-
Herold v Wassermann,
...Mortgage Ltd. v Robertson (1984), 35 Sask R 84 at para 2 (CA); and Canadian Pacific Railway Company v Kelly Panteluk Construction Ltd., 2020 SKCA 123 at para 55, 17 CLR (5th) 138. [50] Although the RJR-MacDonald framework is a......
-
Métis Nation – Saskatchewan v Saskatchewan (Environment),
...Canada & Co., 2011 SKCA 152 at para 41, [2012] 6 WWR 1; and Canadian Pacific Railway Company v Kelly Panteluk Construction Ltd., 2020 SKCA 123 at para 58, 17 CLR (5th) 138 [ Kelly Panteluk]. However, one factor that tilts toward the conclusion that a proceeding is abusive is where a par......
-
SHAW v. SHAW, 2020 SKQB 320
...Ottenbreit J.A., writing for the Court of Appeal in Canadian Pacific Railway Company v Kelly Panteluk Construction Ltd., 2020 SKCA 123 at para 58 (CanLII), reaffirmed that the doctrine of abuse of process is a flexible [58] The doctrine of abuse of process is a......
Request a trial to view additional results