Canadian Superior Oil of California, Ltd. v. Kanstrup, 64 DTC 5230

JudgeCartwright, John Robert; Martland, Ronald; Judson, Wilfred; Ritchie, Roland Almon; Spence, Wishart Flett
CourtSupreme Court of Canada
Case DateOctober 06, 1964
JurisdictionCanada (Federal)
Citations64 DTC 5230;1964 CanLII 45 (SCC);47 DLR (2d) 66;[1964] CTC 350;[1965] SCR 57;1964 CanLII 19 (SCC);[1964] SCR 647;49 WWR (ns) 257;45 CR 1;49 WWR (ns) 310;1964 CanLII 93 (SCC);1964 CanLII 94 (SCC);[1964] SCR 657;64 DTC 5227;[1965] SCR 12;46 DLR (2d) 630;1964 CanLII 44 (SCC);47 DLR (2d) 98;[1964] SCR 637;7 CBR (ns) 78;[1965] 2 CCC 129;64 DTC 5218;47 D
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      Read this document for free by creating your vLex Open account
    • FREE SIGN UP
22 practice notes
  • R. v. Moosehunter, 1981 CanLII 13 (SCC)
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Supreme Court of Canada
    • May 11, 1981
    ...Agreement. Cases Noticed: R. v. Sutherland and Wilson (1980), 35 N.R. 361; 7 Man.R.(2d) 359; appld. [para. 10]. Sikyea v. The Queen, [1965] 2 C.C.C. 129, appld. [para. Statutes Noticed: British North America Act, 1930 (Imp.), c. 26 [para. 3]. Game Act, R.S.S. 1967, c. 78, sect. 8(1), sect. ......
  • R. v. Derriksan, 71 DLR (3d) 159
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Supreme Court of Canada
    • October 19, 1976
    ...p. 195: "There can be no doubt that since the decisions of the Supreme Court of Canada in Sikyea v. The Queen, 50 D.L.R. (2d) 80; [1965] 2 C.C.C. 129; [1964] S.C.R. 642, and R. v. George, supra, legislation of the Parliament of Canada and Regulations made thereunder, properly within s.......
  • R. v. Moosehunter, (1981) 9 Sask.R. 149 (SCC)
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Supreme Court of Canada
    • May 11, 1981
    ...Agreement. Cases Noticed: R. v. Sutherland and Wilson (1980), 35 N.R. 361; 7 Man.R.(2d) 359, appld. [para. 10]. Sikyea v. The Queen, [1965] 2 C.C.C. 129, appld. [para. Statutes Noticed: British North America Act, 1930 (Imp.), c. 26 [para. 3]. Game Act, R.S.S. 1967, c. 78, sect. 8(1), sect. ......
  • Dumas v. MNR, (1988) 92 N.R. 394 (FCA)
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Federal Court of Appeal (Canada)
    • October 11, 1988
    ...question, the decision of this court in Fraser v. Minister of National Revenue ([1964] S.C.R. 657; [1964] C.T.C. 372; 64 D.T.C. 5224; 47 D.L.R.(2d) 98) appears to be in point. It was there held that where real estate operators had incorporated companies to hold real estate, the sale of shar......
  • Free signup to view additional results
22 cases
  • R. v. Moosehunter, 1981 CanLII 13 (SCC)
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Supreme Court of Canada
    • May 11, 1981
    ...Agreement. Cases Noticed: R. v. Sutherland and Wilson (1980), 35 N.R. 361; 7 Man.R.(2d) 359; appld. [para. 10]. Sikyea v. The Queen, [1965] 2 C.C.C. 129, appld. [para. Statutes Noticed: British North America Act, 1930 (Imp.), c. 26 [para. 3]. Game Act, R.S.S. 1967, c. 78, sect. 8(1), sect. ......
  • R. v. Derriksan, 71 DLR (3d) 159
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Supreme Court of Canada
    • October 19, 1976
    ...p. 195: "There can be no doubt that since the decisions of the Supreme Court of Canada in Sikyea v. The Queen, 50 D.L.R. (2d) 80; [1965] 2 C.C.C. 129; [1964] S.C.R. 642, and R. v. George, supra, legislation of the Parliament of Canada and Regulations made thereunder, properly within s.......
  • R. v. Moosehunter, (1981) 9 Sask.R. 149 (SCC)
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Supreme Court of Canada
    • May 11, 1981
    ...Agreement. Cases Noticed: R. v. Sutherland and Wilson (1980), 35 N.R. 361; 7 Man.R.(2d) 359, appld. [para. 10]. Sikyea v. The Queen, [1965] 2 C.C.C. 129, appld. [para. Statutes Noticed: British North America Act, 1930 (Imp.), c. 26 [para. 3]. Game Act, R.S.S. 1967, c. 78, sect. 8(1), sect. ......
  • Dumas v. MNR, (1988) 92 N.R. 394 (FCA)
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Federal Court of Appeal (Canada)
    • October 11, 1988
    ...question, the decision of this court in Fraser v. Minister of National Revenue ([1964] S.C.R. 657; [1964] C.T.C. 372; 64 D.T.C. 5224; 47 D.L.R.(2d) 98) appears to be in point. It was there held that where real estate operators had incorporated companies to hold real estate, the sale of shar......
  • Free signup to view additional results