Canex Investment Corporation v. 0799701 B.C. Ltd., 2020 BCCA 231
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | The Honourable Chief Justice Bauman,The Honourable Mr. Justice Harris,The Honourable Madam Justice DeWitt-Van Oosten |
| Citation | 2020 BCCA 231 |
| Docket Number | CA46363; CA46364 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (British Columbia) |
| Date | 18 August 2020 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
9 practice notes
-
Haack v Secure Energy (Drilling Services) Inc,
...defendants was rooted in this approach, and does not reflect an error in principle: Canex Investment Corporation v. 0799701 B.C. Ltd., 2020 BCCA 231 at para [548] Applying this law, and considering first the pleadings, I am satisfied that the Amended Statement of Claim is sufficient to brin......
-
Brockman v. Valmont Industries Holland B.V.,
...discussed the relationship between derivative actions and the oppression remedy in Canex Investment Corporation v. 0799701 B.C. Ltd., 2020 BCCA 231, in which Justice Harris addressed how the courts should approach the determination of whether the oppression remedy is available to a [12] Opp......
-
Parmar v. Translink Security Management Limited, 2020 BCSC 1625
...delay. While troubling, a trier of fact need not advert to every piece of evidence: Canex Investment Corporation v. 0799701 B.C. Ltd., 2020 BCCA 231 at para. 87. In any event, it is obvious the Member understood the reason behind Mr. Parmar’s delay in filing the complaint between October 20......
-
Xing v. Aikang GP (006) Management Ltd.,
...to grant the remedy requested: see BCE at paras. 56 – 62; Canex Investment Corporation v. 0799701 B.C. Ltd., 2020 BCCA 231 at [83] Not every unmet reasonable expectation will warrant a s. 227 remedy. The assessment of a claim involv......
Request a trial to view additional results
8 cases
-
Haack v Secure Energy (Drilling Services) Inc,
...defendants was rooted in this approach, and does not reflect an error in principle: Canex Investment Corporation v. 0799701 B.C. Ltd., 2020 BCCA 231 at para [548] Applying this law, and considering first the pleadings, I am satisfied that the Amended Statement of Claim is sufficient to brin......
-
Brockman v. Valmont Industries Holland B.V.,
...discussed the relationship between derivative actions and the oppression remedy in Canex Investment Corporation v. 0799701 B.C. Ltd., 2020 BCCA 231, in which Justice Harris addressed how the courts should approach the determination of whether the oppression remedy is available to a [12] Opp......
-
Xing v. Aikang GP (006) Management Ltd.,
...to grant the remedy requested: see BCE at paras. 56 – 62; Canex Investment Corporation v. 0799701 B.C. Ltd., 2020 BCCA 231 at [83] Not every unmet reasonable expectation will warrant a s. 227 remedy. The assessment of a claim involv......
-
Parmar v. Translink Security Management Limited, 2020 BCSC 1625
...delay. While troubling, a trier of fact need not advert to every piece of evidence: Canex Investment Corporation v. 0799701 B.C. Ltd., 2020 BCCA 231 at para. 87. In any event, it is obvious the Member understood the reason behind Mr. Parmar’s delay in filing the complaint between October 20......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
Expanding Minority Shareholder Remedies
...recent decision of Canex Investment Corporation v. 0799701 B.C. Ltd., 2020 BCCA 231, The British Court of Appeal signaled an expansion of the circumstances in which aggrieved minority shareholders can seek relief under the oppression remedy contained in the BC Business Corporations Act. In ......