Canexus Corporation v MEG Energy, 2017 ABQB 739
| Judge | J.T. Prowse |
| Citation | 2017 ABQB 739 |
| Date | 01 December 2017 |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada) |
| Docket Number | 1401 09585 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 practice notes
-
Macdonald v Burke, 2018 ABQB 534
...evidence may overlap but the matters can be reasonably separated. Master Prowse’s decision in Canexus Corporation v MEG Energy, 2017 ABQB 739 at para 48, tells the Court that the issue is whether the matter is in arbitration will answer any of the issues in dispute, so it is overlap ......
-
Lischuk v K-Jay Electric Ltd,
...Co Inc v AMEC Americas Limited, 2014 ABCA 74 at para 27; Donoghue v Johnson, 2012 ABQB 295 at para 25; Canexus Corporation v MEG Energy, 2017 ABQB 739 at paras [32] Claims that could be struck under Rule 3.68 include claims where: · The Court has no jurisdiction; · The pleading discloses no......
-
Evans v Mattice, 2018 ABQB 27
...to amend should only be declined on the basis of hopelessness where the law is settled. See Canexus Corporation v MEG Energy, 2017 ABQB 739, 2017 CarswellAlta 2567, at para’s 28 to 31.[12] Here the law is not settled on whether section 10 of the Charter applies to proceedings under the Ment......
3 cases
-
Macdonald v Burke, 2018 ABQB 534
...evidence may overlap but the matters can be reasonably separated. Master Prowse’s decision in Canexus Corporation v MEG Energy, 2017 ABQB 739 at para 48, tells the Court that the issue is whether the matter is in arbitration will answer any of the issues in dispute, so it is overlap ......
-
Lischuk v K-Jay Electric Ltd,
...Co Inc v AMEC Americas Limited, 2014 ABCA 74 at para 27; Donoghue v Johnson, 2012 ABQB 295 at para 25; Canexus Corporation v MEG Energy, 2017 ABQB 739 at paras [32] Claims that could be struck under Rule 3.68 include claims where: · The Court has no jurisdiction; · The pleading discloses no......
-
Evans v Mattice, 2018 ABQB 27
...to amend should only be declined on the basis of hopelessness where the law is settled. See Canexus Corporation v MEG Energy, 2017 ABQB 739, 2017 CarswellAlta 2567, at para’s 28 to 31.[12] Here the law is not settled on whether section 10 of the Charter applies to proceedings under the Ment......