Capital Plymouth Chrysler Inc. v. Euro Sport Auto Sales Ltd., (1998) 224 A.R. 298 (QBM)
| Court | Court of Queen''s Bench of Alberta (Canada) |
| Case Date | Friday June 12, 1998 |
| Citations | (1998), 224 A.R. 298 (QBM) |
Cap. Plymouth v. Euro Sport Auto (1998), 224 A.R. 298 (QBM)
MLB headnote and full text
Temp. Cite: [1998] A.R. TBEd. JL.009
Capital Plymouth Chrysler Inc. and Capital Plymouth Chrysler Inc., carrying on business under the firm name and style of Capital Chrysler Jeep Eagle and Capital Chrysler Jeep Eagle (applicants) v. Euro Sport Auto Sales Ltd. (respondent)
(Action No. 9803-05514)
Indexed As: Capital Plymouth Chrysler Inc. v. Euro Sport Auto Sales Ltd.
Alberta Court of Queen's Bench
Judicial District of Edmonton
Funduk, Master in Chambers
June 12, 1998.
Summary:
At issue in this lawsuit was whether the document the respondent held qualified as a security agreement under s. 10(1)(b) of the Personal Property Security Act (Alta.).
A Master of the Alberta Court of Queen's Bench held that the document did not qualify as a security agreement.
Personal Property - Topic 6007
Security interests - General - Security agreement defined - The creditor gave a loan on the security of a truck - The truck was left with the creditor as well as the vehicle registration certificate - The back of the vehicle registration certificate (the section 2 certificate) had been signed in blank by the alleged owner of the truck - The creditor lost possession of the truck but registered a financing statement at Personal Property Security Registry - A Master of the Alberta Court of Queen's Bench held that the section 2 certificate did not qualify as a security agreement under s. 10(1)(b) of the Personal Property Security Act (Alta.) - The Master ordered the Registry to discharge the financing statement registered by the creditor.
Cases Noticed:
Alberta (Treasury Branches) v. Faja Bison Ranch Inc. (1994), 152 A.R. 112 (Q.B.), refd to. [para. 15].
Statutes Noticed:
Personal Property Security Act, S.A. 1988, c. P-4.05, sect. 10(1)(a), sect. 10(1)(b)(i) [para. 11].
Authors and Works Noticed:
Cuming, Ronald C.C., and Wood, Roderick J., Alberta Personal Property Security Handbook (2nd Ed.), pp. 108 to 109 [para. 15].
Counsel:
G. Orr (Bryan & Company), for the applicant;
C.M. Odishaw (Odishaw & Odishaw), for the respondent.
This application was heard by Funduk, Master in Chambers, of the Alberta Court of Queen's Bench, Judicial District of Edmonton, who delivered the following decision on June 12, 1998.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Alberta (Treasury Branches) v. McKinnon
...Bison Ranch Inc. et al. (1994), 152 A.R. 112 (Q.B.), refd to. [para. 13]. Capital Plymouth Chrysler Inc. v. Euro Sport Auto Sales Ltd. (1998), 224 A.R. 298; 1998 ABQB 449, refd to. [para. Andrews et al. v. General Accident Assurance of Canada (1995), 165 A.R. 65; 89 W.A.C. 65; 1995 ABCA 46,......
-
Alberta (Treasury Branches) v. McKinnon
...Bison Ranch Inc. et al. (1994), 152 A.R. 112 (Q.B.), refd to. [para. 13]. Capital Plymouth Chrysler Inc. v. Euro Sport Auto Sales Ltd. (1998), 224 A.R. 298; 1998 ABQB 449, refd to. [para. Andrews et al. v. General Accident Assurance of Canada (1995), 165 A.R. 65; 89 W.A.C. 65; 1995 ABCA 46,......