Caplin v. Canada (Minister of Justice)

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
CourtSupreme Court (Canada)
JudgeMcLachlin, C.J.C., Abella, Rothstein, Cromwell, Moldaver, Karakatsanis, Wagner, Gascon and Côté, JJ.
Citation[2015] N.R. TBEd. MY.026,2015 SCC 32,[2015] 2 SCR 570
Date29 May 2015
Subject MatterEXTRADITION,CIVIL RIGHTS,CRIMINAL LAW

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
5 practice notes
  • M.M. v. United States of America
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • December 11, 2015
    ...America, 2012 SCC 70, [2012] 3 S.C.R. 609; United States of America v. Kwok, 2001 SCC 18, [2001] 1 S.C.R. 532; Caplin v. Canada (Justice), 2015 SCC 32, [2015] 2 S.C.R. 568; Lake v. Canada (Minister of Justice), 2008 SCC 23, [2008] 1 S.C.R. 761; United States of America v. Taylor, 2005 BCCA ......
  • Application for Judicial Review
    • Canada
    • Criminal Law Series Prosecuting and Defending Extradition Cases: A Practitioner's Handbook
    • May 2, 2017
    ...Schmidt , supra note 18 at para 48. 94 Mellino , supra note 53 at para 36. See also Kindler , supra note 18; Caplin v Canada (Justice) , 2015 SCC 32 at para 3, [2015] 2 SCR 570; and MM , supra note 10 at para 120. 95 Canada (Attorney General) v Barnaby , 2015 SCC 31 at para 9, [2015] 2 SCR ......
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Criminal Law Series Prosecuting and Defending Extradition Cases: A Practitioner's Handbook
    • May 2, 2017
    ...327, 377, 384, 389 Cao, United States of America v , 2009 CanLII 65377 (Ont Sup Ct J) .................. 172 Caplin v Canada (Justice) , 2015 SCC 32, [2015] 2 SCR 570 ........................ 385 Caruana, Italy v , [2004] OJ No 5851 (QL) (Sup Ct J) ............................ 224 Caruana......
  • N. M. v. Contreras-Ramirez
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • July 8, 2021
    ...[1995] B.C.J. No. 2370, reversed on issue of vicarious liability of an employer, [1997] 31 B.C.L.R. (3d) 1 (C.A.), affirmed [1999], 2 S.C.R. 570; T.O. v. J.H.O., 2006 BCSC 560 at para. [44]        Cases involving penetration and cases where the defendant i......
  • Get Started for Free
3 cases
  • M.M. v. United States of America
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • December 11, 2015
    ...America, 2012 SCC 70, [2012] 3 S.C.R. 609; United States of America v. Kwok, 2001 SCC 18, [2001] 1 S.C.R. 532; Caplin v. Canada (Justice), 2015 SCC 32, [2015] 2 S.C.R. 568; Lake v. Canada (Minister of Justice), 2008 SCC 23, [2008] 1 S.C.R. 761; United States of America v. Taylor, 2005 BCCA ......
  • N. M. v. Contreras-Ramirez
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • July 8, 2021
    ...[1995] B.C.J. No. 2370, reversed on issue of vicarious liability of an employer, [1997] 31 B.C.L.R. (3d) 1 (C.A.), affirmed [1999], 2 S.C.R. 570; T.O. v. J.H.O., 2006 BCSC 560 at para. [44] Cases involving penetration and cases where the defendant is in a position of power or authority are ......
  • Canada (Attorney General) v. Barnaby
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • May 29, 2015
    ...there is new DNA evidence that, if accepted, would directly implicate his co-accused, Mr. Caplin (see Caplin v. Canada (Justice) , 2015 SCC 32). In doing so, it would also indirectly implicate Mr. Barnaby. This evidence may be considered confirmatory of Mr. Barnaby's prior statements that t......
2 books & journal articles
  • Application for Judicial Review
    • Canada
    • Criminal Law Series Prosecuting and Defending Extradition Cases: A Practitioner's Handbook
    • May 2, 2017
    ...Schmidt , supra note 18 at para 48. 94 Mellino , supra note 53 at para 36. See also Kindler , supra note 18; Caplin v Canada (Justice) , 2015 SCC 32 at para 3, [2015] 2 SCR 570; and MM , supra note 10 at para 120. 95 Canada (Attorney General) v Barnaby , 2015 SCC 31 at para 9, [2015] 2 SCR ......
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Criminal Law Series Prosecuting and Defending Extradition Cases: A Practitioner's Handbook
    • May 2, 2017
    ...327, 377, 384, 389 Cao, United States of America v , 2009 CanLII 65377 (Ont Sup Ct J) .................. 172 Caplin v Canada (Justice) , 2015 SCC 32, [2015] 2 SCR 570 ........................ 385 Caruana, Italy v , [2004] OJ No 5851 (QL) (Sup Ct J) ............................ 224 Caruana......