Carvalho Estate v. Verma

JurisdictionOntario
CourtCourt of Appeal (Ontario)
Citation2024 ONCA 222
Docket NumberM54919; COA-24-CV-0225
Date22 March 2024

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
8 practice notes
  • NTI v. Nunavut
    • Canada
    • Nunavut Court of Appeal (Canada)
    • 16 Mayo 2024
    ...demonstrate all three elements of the RJR-MacDonald test: R v Canadian Broadcasting Corp, 2018 SCC 5 at para 12; Carvalho Estate v Verma, 2024 ONCA 222 at para 5 (“all three factors must be satisfied for a stay to be granted”); Landry v Abenakis of Wolinak First Nation, 2021 FCA 197 at para......
  • 1995636 Ontario Inc. C.O.B. 2B Developments v. 5010729 Ontario Inc. C.O.B. as Astute
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 17 Diciembre 2024
    ...Discussion Introduction [4]            As stated in Carvalho Estate v. Verma, 2024 ONCA 222, at para. The overarching consideration is whether a stay is in the interests of justice: Sase Aggregate Ltd. v. Langdon, 2023 ONCA 64......
  • De Longte v. De Longte
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • 15 Enero 2025
    ...of these factors need not be equal, but all three factors must be satisfied for the court to grant a stay: Carvalho Estate v. Verma, 2024 ONCA 222, at para. 5; R. v. Canadian Broadcasting Corp., 2018 SCC 5, [2018] 1 S.C.R. 196, at para. 12. I will analyze each factor in turn. [9] &nbsp......
  • Royce Presidential Investments Inc. v. Valour Group Inc.
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • 24 Diciembre 2025
    ...v. Saiyid, 2017 ONCA 919, at para. 18. However, all three factors must be satisfied for a stay to be granted: Carvalho Estate v. Verma, 2024 ONCA 222, 170 O.R. (3d) 781, at para. 1. Serious issue to be determined on the appeal [22] I recognize that for the purposes of this stay motion, the ......
  • Get Started for Free
9 cases
  • Royal Bank of Canada v. 1512632 Ontario Inc. (Cheema & Sons Transport)
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • 25 Agosto 2026
    ...(6th) 56, at paras. 27-28; Wilfert v. McCallum, 2017 ONCA 895, 54 C.B.R. (6th) 249, at para. 6; and Carvalho Estate v. Verma, 2024 ONCA 222, 170 O.R. (3d) 781, at paras. [81]       The applicant bears the burden of proof in demonstrating that the stay......
  • NTI v. Nunavut
    • Canada
    • Nunavut Court of Appeal (Canada)
    • 16 Mayo 2024
    ...demonstrate all three elements of the RJR-MacDonald test: R v Canadian Broadcasting Corp, 2018 SCC 5 at para 12; Carvalho Estate v Verma, 2024 ONCA 222 at para 5 (“all three factors must be satisfied for a stay to be granted”); Landry v Abenakis of Wolinak First Nation, 2021 FCA 197 at para......
  • Royce Presidential Investments Inc. v. Valour Group Inc.
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • 24 Diciembre 2025
    ...v. Saiyid, 2017 ONCA 919, at para. 18. However, all three factors must be satisfied for a stay to be granted: Carvalho Estate v. Verma, 2024 ONCA 222, 170 O.R. (3d) 781, at para. 1. Serious issue to be determined on the appeal [22] I recognize that for the purposes of this stay motion, the ......
  • 1995636 Ontario Inc. C.O.B. 2B Developments v. 5010729 Ontario Inc. C.O.B. as Astute
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 17 Diciembre 2024
    ...Discussion Introduction [4]            As stated in Carvalho Estate v. Verma, 2024 ONCA 222, at para. The overarching consideration is whether a stay is in the interests of justice: Sase Aggregate Ltd. v. Langdon, 2023 ONCA 64......
  • Get Started for Free