Casbohm v Winacott Spring Western

JurisdictionSaskatchewan
CourtCourt of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
JudgeCaldwell, Whitmore and Leurer JJ.A.
Neutral Citation2021 SKCA 21
Citation2021 SKCA 21
Date03 February 2021
Docket NumberCACV3396

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
5 practice notes
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (June 12 ' 16, 2023)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • June 20, 2023
    ...2008 ABCA 353, Spasic Estate v. Imperial Tobacco Ltd. (2000), 49 O.R. (3d) 699 (C.A.), Casbohm v. Winacott Spring Western Star Trucks, 2021 SKCA 21, St. Louis v. Canada (1896), 25 S.C.R. 649, Armstrong v. Moore, 2020 ONCA 49, R. v. Livingston, 2018 ONCJ 25 Lauzon v. Ontario (Justicesof the ......
  • Direct General Partner Corporation v Canadian Pacific Railway Company,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • March 11, 2025
    ...was not qualified to give such opinion: Casbohm v Winacott Spring Western Star Trucks, 2019 SKQB 44 at para 112, [2019] 9 WWR 714, aff'd 2021 SKCA 21, leave to appeal to SCC refused, 2021 CanLII 142 Finally, the Ramcharan Affidavit was not accompanied by a statement “identifying the area of......
  • The Most Important Cases For Personal Injury Lawyers
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • May 5, 2021
    ...the verbal threshold before the limitation period begins to run. See for example, Peixeiro v Haberman, [1997] S.C.R. 549. 11. Supra 12. 2021 SKCA 21 13. Liability was determined on consent on a motion for summary judgment using affidavit evidence including affidavits from 3 experts. 14. The......
  • 2023 ONCA 412,
    • Canada
    • January 1, 2023
    ...a fair trial process and interferes with the quest for the truth in judicial proceedings: Casbohm v. Winacott Spring Western Star Trucks, 2021 SKCA 21, at para. 36. As such, it amounts to an abuse of 23 In St. Louis v. Canada (1896), 25 S.C.R. 649, at pp. 652–653, the Supreme Court e......
  • Get Started for Free
2 cases
  • Direct General Partner Corporation v Canadian Pacific Railway Company
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • March 11, 2025
    ...was not qualified to give such opinion: Casbohm v Winacott Spring Western Star Trucks, 2019 SKQB 44 at para 112, [2019] 9 WWR 714, aff'd 2021 SKCA 21, leave to appeal to SCC refused, 2021 CanLII 142 Finally, the Ramcharan Affidavit was not accompanied by a statement “identifying the area of......
  • Trillium Power Wind Corporation v Ontario
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • June 13, 2023
    ...a fair trial process and interferes with the quest for the truth in judicial proceedings: Casbohm v. Winacott Spring Western Star Trucks, 2021 SKCA 21, at para. 36. As such, it amounts to an abuse of 23 In St. Louis v. Canada (1896), 25 S.C.R. 649, at pp. 652–653, the Supreme Court e......
2 firm's commentaries
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (June 12 ' 16, 2023)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • June 20, 2023
    ...2008 ABCA 353, Spasic Estate v. Imperial Tobacco Ltd. (2000), 49 O.R. (3d) 699 (C.A.), Casbohm v. Winacott Spring Western Star Trucks, 2021 SKCA 21, St. Louis v. Canada (1896), 25 S.C.R. 649, Armstrong v. Moore, 2020 ONCA 49, R. v. Livingston, 2018 ONCJ 25 Lauzon v. Ontario (Justicesof the ......
  • The Most Important Cases For Personal Injury Lawyers
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • May 5, 2021
    ...the verbal threshold before the limitation period begins to run. See for example, Peixeiro v Haberman, [1997] S.C.R. 549. 11. Supra 12. 2021 SKCA 21 13. Liability was determined on consent on a motion for summary judgment using affidavit evidence including affidavits from 3 experts. 14. The......