Cascade Builders Ltd. v. Alberta Government Telephones, (1976) 1 A.R. 257 (TD)

JudgeLaycraft, J.
CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
Case DateNovember 08, 1976
Citations(1976), 1 A.R. 257 (TD)

Cascade Builders Ltd. v. Govt. Tel. (1976), 1 A.R. 257 (TD)

MLB headnote and full text

Cascade Builders Ltd. v. Alberta Government Telephones

Indexed As: Cascade Builders Ltd. v. Alberta Government Telephones

Alberta Supreme Court

Trial Division

Judicial District of Calgary

Laycraft, J.

November 8, 1976.

Summary:

This headnote contains no summary.

Arbitration - Topic 944

The submission - Scope of the submission - Jurisdiction of arbitrators - A building contract contained an arbitration clause which allowed either party to refer "any matter arising" under the contract to arbitration - The owner claimed $100,000.00 for breach of contract and the contractor claimed $211,565.00 for extras - The parties applied to the Alberta Supreme Court, Trial Division, pursuant to Rule 232 of the Rules of Court to determine whether the arbitrators had jurisdiction to hear the claims of the parties - The Trial Division held that the arbitrators had jurisdiction to hear the claims - The Trial Division stated that a party may require arbitration of a dispute on which he may be wrong or may lose and that there are no interim proceedings, as in the courts, available to the parties to narrow or dispose of the issues.

Cases Noticed:

Heyman v. Darwins Ltd., [1942] A.C. 356, folld. [para. 6].

American Almond Products Co. v. Consolidated Pecan Sales Co. Inc. (1944), 144 F(2d) 448, folld. [para. 8].

Sissons v. Oates (1894), 10 T.L.R. 392, folld. [para. 10].

International Assoc. of Machinists v. Cutler-Hammer Inc. (1947), 67 N.Y.S. (2d) 317, folld. [para. 10].

Steelworkers v. American Mfg. Co. (1960), 363 U.S. 564, folld. [para. 10].

Statutes Noticed:

Rules of Court (Alta.), rule 232.

Authors and Works Noticed:

Russel on Arbitration (18th Ed.), p. 214 [para. 9].

Counsel:

W.J. Major, Q.C., for Alberta Government Telephones;

R.F. Goss, for Cascade Builders Ltd.

The judgment of the Alberta Supreme Court, Trial Division was delivered by Laycraft, J., at Calgary, Alberta on November 8, 1976.

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 practice notes
  • Central Okanagan (Regional District) v. Westbank Indian Band et al., (1996) 71 B.C.A.C. 206 (CA)
    • Canada
    • British Columbia Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • 2 Febrero 1996
    ...S.C.R. 967; 183 N.R. 229; 163 N.B.R.(2d) 97; 419 A.P.R. 97, refd to. [para. 22]. Cascade Builders Ltd. v. Alberta Government Telephones (1976), 1 A.R. 257 (T.D.), refd to. [para. Globe Union Industrial Corp. v. G.A.P. Marketing Corp., [1995] 2 W.W.R. 696; 100 B.C.L.R.(2d) 41 (S.C.), refd to......
  • Sheer et al. v. Lee et al., (2000) 263 A.R. 305 (QB)
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 13 Marzo 2000
    ...25 W.W.R.(N.S.) 641 (Alta. C.A.), affd. [1959] S.C.R. 253, refd to. [para. 25]. Cascade Builders Ltd. v. Alberta Government Telephones (1976), 1 A.R. 257 (T.D.), refd to. [para. 26]. Heyman v. Darwins Ltd., [1942] A.C. 356 (H.L.), refd to. [para. 26]. Newfoundland (Attorney General) v. Chur......
  • Kaverit Steel and Crane Ltd. et al. v. Kone Corp. et al., (1991) 119 A.R. 194 (QB)
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 14 Mayo 1991
    ...v. Pan West Engr. and Constr. Ltd., [1973] 1 W.W.R. 412, refd to. [para. 5]. Cascade Builders Ltd. v. Alberta Government Telephones (1976), 1 A.R. 257, refd to. [para. Sopac Italiana S.p.a. v. Bukama GmbH (F.R.G.) and F.I.M.M., Rivista di Diritto Internazionale Privato Processuale, ICA New ......
3 cases
  • Central Okanagan (Regional District) v. Westbank Indian Band et al., (1996) 71 B.C.A.C. 206 (CA)
    • Canada
    • British Columbia Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • 2 Febrero 1996
    ...S.C.R. 967; 183 N.R. 229; 163 N.B.R.(2d) 97; 419 A.P.R. 97, refd to. [para. 22]. Cascade Builders Ltd. v. Alberta Government Telephones (1976), 1 A.R. 257 (T.D.), refd to. [para. Globe Union Industrial Corp. v. G.A.P. Marketing Corp., [1995] 2 W.W.R. 696; 100 B.C.L.R.(2d) 41 (S.C.), refd to......
  • Sheer et al. v. Lee et al., (2000) 263 A.R. 305 (QB)
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 13 Marzo 2000
    ...25 W.W.R.(N.S.) 641 (Alta. C.A.), affd. [1959] S.C.R. 253, refd to. [para. 25]. Cascade Builders Ltd. v. Alberta Government Telephones (1976), 1 A.R. 257 (T.D.), refd to. [para. 26]. Heyman v. Darwins Ltd., [1942] A.C. 356 (H.L.), refd to. [para. 26]. Newfoundland (Attorney General) v. Chur......
  • Kaverit Steel and Crane Ltd. et al. v. Kone Corp. et al., (1991) 119 A.R. 194 (QB)
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 14 Mayo 1991
    ...v. Pan West Engr. and Constr. Ltd., [1973] 1 W.W.R. 412, refd to. [para. 5]. Cascade Builders Ltd. v. Alberta Government Telephones (1976), 1 A.R. 257, refd to. [para. Sopac Italiana S.p.a. v. Bukama GmbH (F.R.G.) and F.I.M.M., Rivista di Diritto Internazionale Privato Processuale, ICA New ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT