'Casual Encounters' of the Worst Kind
Author | Julianna A Greenspan & Brad Greenshields |
Pages | 49-65 |
CasualEncounters
oftheWorstKind
Julianna A Greenspan & Brad Greenshields*
FifteenyearsagoayoungBlackmanwas walkingalongaTorontostreet
duringthelunchhourinacommunitynearschoolswithahistoryofdrug
activityThree police ocerstwo ofwhomwere in plainclotheswere
patrollingt hearea engagedin whatt hestate thenca lledcommunity
policinga dynam icinteract ionbet weenpolice and citizen spur port
edlyintendedtomaintainavisiblepolicepresenceandtodetercr ime
The ocers asked the young man Donnohue Grant to have a
chatThey ashed their badgesta king uppositions that blocked the
manspath on the sidewalk The un iformed ocer askedwhat was
going on and asked for identication Mr Grant provideda hea lth
cardAccordingtotheocersheappearednervousadjustedhisjacket
promptingadi rectionto keephis handsin frontofh imTheocers
testiedthattheypulledtheirvehiclesuponMrGrantbecausetheyhad
afunnyfeelingbasedontheyoungmanswayoflookingoveratthem
whiledgetingwithhiscoatandpants
The ocers asked Donnohue whether he had everb een arrested
and whetherhehad anything he shouldnthaveHe handed over a
small bagof can nabis anda fter morequest ionsa rear mIn a
majorityof the Supreme Courtfound that Donnohue Grantssections
andCharterrightshadbeenbreac hedandth athehadbeendetaine d
withoutcausebuttheCourtallowedtheadmissionoftherearmunder
BothofGreenspa nPartnersLLP
JAGBG
sectionofthe Charter. TheCourtsetout aframeworkfor thedef
initionof detentionundersec tionsa ndofthe Charterande stab
lished a threepart te stfor exclusion of evidence under section
Importantlythe Court emphasiz ed that there was no suggestion that
MrGrantwasthetargetofracialprolingorotherdiscriminatorypolice
practice s
Regreablyalltooofte ncommunitypolicing hasi nreality been
aeuphemism forproling in socalled highriskarea sbased onthe
stereotypethatindividualsofacertainraceorbackgroundhaveagreater
propensityfor crime This wasal legedin R v FerdinandwhereJustice
Harry S LaForme then of the Superior Court of Justice considered a
Charter motion basedon analleged improperuse ofthe TorontoPolice
Servicepract iceofcardingi ncludingthe investigativetoolknown
thenasacardJusticeLaFormedescribedthecardasfollows
Acardisapproximatelybyandisprintedonbothsidescom
mencingwiththewordsPersonInvestigatedItrecordsinformation
obtainedf romapersonwho isstoppedbyt hepolicethati ncludesin
formations uchas namea liases dateof birth colouraddres sand
contact location including t he timeOn t he back it has entries for
things such as associates a ndassociated w ith gang motorcycle
clubDr ugTreatment Cour tThe police t hen input the infor mation
fromthecompletedcardsintoapolicecomputerdatabasefortheir
futurereference
Theocersin Ferdina ndtesti edthatthey usedthe cardsina neu
tralcasualandconsensualmannertheymerelyapproachedsomeone
and asked if they minded givi ngt hem the relevant information The
ocersassertedthatifthepersonsaidnoandtherewerenogrounds
todetainthemtheywouldsimplymoveonandbidthepersontohave
anice dayThes cenario inFerdinand wasasfollows Twoocersap
proacheda groupof youthsincluding MrFerdin andhangi ngoutbe
hindanapartmentbuildingTheocersquestionedthegroupandused
cardstorecordpersonali nformationabouttheone sinterviewed
MrFerdinandtestiedthatthetwoocersroutinelystoppedhimques
tionedhi mforcardi nformation andsearc hedhimw ithouthiscon
sentWhen they arrived the ocerss awMr Ferdinandstar t toleave
thea reaOne oft hemnoticed a marijuana jointW henthe ocertold
R v GrantSCCGrant
R v FerdinandCanLIIOntSCJFerdinand
Ibid atpara
To continue reading
Request your trial