Celanese Canada Inc. v. Murray Demolition Corp., 2006 SCC 36
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Supreme Court (Canada) |
| Judge | McLachlin, Beverley; Bastarache, Michel; Binnie, William Ian Corneil; LeBel, Louis; Deschamps, Marie; Fish, Morris J.; Charron, Louise |
| Citation | 2006 SCC 36,[2006] 2 SCR 189,269 DLR (4th) 193,EYB 2006-108007,[2006] SCJ No 35 (QL),215 OAC 266,352 NR 1,[2006] ACS no 35,[2006] CarswellOnt 462,50 CPR (4th) 241 |
| Docket Number | 30652 |
| Subject Matter | CRIMINAL LAW,BARRISTERS AND SOLICITORS,PRACTICE,EVIDENCE |
| Date | 27 July 2006 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
38 practice notes
-
Table of cases
...Cat Productions Ltd v Macedo, [1985] 1 FC 269 (TD) .........................................17 Celanese Canada Inc v Murray Demolition, [2006] 2 SCR 189 ........................ 296 Table of Cases 709 Chambers v Murphy, [1953] 2 DLR 705 (Ont CA) ...................................................
-
Table of Cases
...77 Celanese Canada Inc. v. Murray Demolition Corp., [2006] 2 S.C.R. 189, 2006 SCC 36, 50 C.P.R. (4th) 241 ............................................................... 627 Celanese International Corp. v. BP Chemicals Ltd., [1999] R.P.C. 203 (Pat. Ct.) ...........................................
-
Table of Cases
...64 C.P.R. (3d) 462, [1995] F.C.J. No. 1645 (T.D.) ........................... 240 Celanese Canada Inc. v. Murray Demolition Corp., [2006] 2 S.C.R. 189, 30 C.P.C. (6th) 193, [2006] S.C.J. No. 35 .................................................... 240 Central Trust Co. v. Rafuse, [1986] 2 S.......
-
Privileges, Protections, and Immunities
...Ontario Court of Appeal stated: 38 Rumping v DPP , [1962] 3 All ER 256 (HL) [ Rumping ]. 39 Celanese Canada Inc v Murray Demolition , [2006] 2 SCR 189; Chan v Dynasty Executive Suites Ltd , 2006 CanLII 23950 (Ont SCJ). 40 For a good summary of the law, see White v 123627 Canada Inc, 2014 ON......
Request a trial to view additional results
22 cases
-
Mahjoub v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2017 FCA 157
...concerning the removal of solicitors discussed by the Supreme Court in Celanese Canada Inc. v. Murray Demolition Corp., 2006 SCC 36, [2006] 2 S.C.R. 189 and applied the factors discussed in that [310] Here again, the Federal Court applied correct legal principles to the facts before it. And......
-
Mahjoub (Re),
...3 S.C.R. 1235 , (1990), 77 D.L.R. (4th) 249 , [1991] 1 W.W.R. 705; Celanese Canada Inc. v. Murray Demolition Corp., 2006 SCC 36, [2006] 2 S.C.R. 189, 269 D.L.R. (4th) 193 , 30 C.P.C. (6th) 193; R. v. Nixon, 2011 SCC 34 , [2011] 2 S.C.R. 566, 502 A.R. 18 , 335 D.L.R. (4th) 565 .CONSIDER......
-
Jaballah (Re),
...77(1), 83(1)(a) (as am. by S.C. 2008, c. 3, s. 4 ).CASES CITEDAPPLIED:Celanese Canada Inc. v. Murray Demolition Corp., 2006 SCC 36, [2006] 2 S.C.R. 189, 269 D.L.R. (4th) 193 , 30 C.P.C. (6th) 193.CONSIDERED:Jaballah v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2007 FC 379 , 296 ......
-
Slansky c. Canada (procureur général),
...dans l’original; note en bas de page omise.]2 S.C.R. 32, 2006 SCC 31; Celanese Canada Inc. v. Murray Demolition Corp., [2006] 2 S.C.R. 189, 2006 SCC 36; Juman v. Doucette, [2008] 1 S.C.R. 157, 2008 SCC 8. A rare exception, which has no application here, is that no privilege attaches ......
Request a trial to view additional results
3 firm's commentaries
-
Best Practices To Adopt In Reaction To The Unauthorized Communication Or Retrieval Of Privileged Information
...(Minister of Justice), 2006 SCC 39. 3. Celanese Canada Inc. v. Murray Demolition Corp (hereafter "Celanese"), 2006 SCC 36 (CanLII), [2006] 2 SCR 189. 4. An Anton Piller order is a specific form of civil injunctive relief which urges a defendant to permit a plaintiff to enter its property to......
-
Will the Supreme Court Rein in Evasive Defendants? Equustek v Google Inc
...[1985] 1 SCR 2. [2] See Anton Piller KG v. Manufacturing Processes Ltd., [1976] 1 Ch 55 (C.A.) and Celanese Canada v. Murray Demolition, [2006] 2 SCR 189. [3] Norwich Pharmacal Co. v. Commissioners of Customs and Excise, [1974] AC 133 (HL); Glaxo Wellcome PLC c. MNR, [1998] 4 FCR 439 (CA) a......
-
The Civil Sheriff Comes Knocking On The Door Anton Piller Orders
...named, the AP order, which has been described by the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) in Celanese Canada Inc. v. Murray Demolition Corp., [2006] 2 S.C.R. 189 as a "private warrant," is not something one encounters every day. However, if one is on either end of such a drastic order, then it is ......
7 books & journal articles
-
Table of Cases
...64 C.P.R. (3d) 462, [1995] F.C.J. No. 1645 (T.D.) ........................... 240 Celanese Canada Inc. v. Murray Demolition Corp., [2006] 2 S.C.R. 189, 30 C.P.C. (6th) 193, [2006] S.C.J. No. 35 .................................................... 240 Central Trust Co. v. Rafuse, [1986] 2 S.......
-
Privileges, Protections, and Immunities
...Ontario Court of Appeal stated: 38 Rumping v DPP , [1962] 3 All ER 256 (HL) [ Rumping ]. 39 Celanese Canada Inc v Murray Demolition , [2006] 2 SCR 189; Chan v Dynasty Executive Suites Ltd , 2006 CanLII 23950 (Ont SCJ). 40 For a good summary of the law, see White v 123627 Canada Inc, 2014 ON......
-
Table of cases
...Cat Productions Ltd v Macedo, [1985] 1 FC 269 (TD) .........................................17 Celanese Canada Inc v Murray Demolition, [2006] 2 SCR 189 ........................ 296 Table of Cases 709 Chambers v Murphy, [1953] 2 DLR 705 (Ont CA) ...................................................
-
Table of Cases
...77 Celanese Canada Inc. v. Murray Demolition Corp., [2006] 2 S.C.R. 189, 2006 SCC 36, 50 C.P.R. (4th) 241 ............................................................... 627 Celanese International Corp. v. BP Chemicals Ltd., [1999] R.P.C. 203 (Pat. Ct.) ...........................................
Request a trial to view additional results