Celanese Canada Inc. v. Murray Demolition Corp.
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Supreme Court (Canada) |
| Judge | McLachlin, Beverley; Bastarache, Michel; Binnie, William Ian Corneil; LeBel, Louis; Deschamps, Marie; Fish, Morris J.; Charron, Louise |
| Citation | 2006 SCC 36,[2006] 2 SCR 189,269 DLR (4th) 193,EYB 2006-108007,[2006] SCJ No 35 (QL),215 OAC 266,352 NR 1,[2006] ACS no 35,[2006] CarswellOnt 462,50 CPR (4th) 241 |
| Date | 27 July 2006 |
| Docket Number | 30652 |
| Subject Matter | CRIMINAL LAW,BARRISTERS AND SOLICITORS,PRACTICE,EVIDENCE |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
14 practice notes
-
Table of Cases
...77 Celanese Canada Inc. v. Murray Demolition Corp., [2006] 2 S.C.R. 189, 2006 SCC 36, 50 C.P.R. (4th) 241 ............................................................... 627 Celanese International Corp. v. BP Chemicals Ltd., [1999] R.P.C. 203 (Pat. Ct.) ...........................................
-
Privileges, Protections, and Immunities
...Ontario Court of Appeal stated: 38 Rumping v DPP , [1962] 3 All ER 256 (HL) [ Rumping ]. 39 Celanese Canada Inc v Murray Demolition , [2006] 2 SCR 189; Chan v Dynasty Executive Suites Ltd , 2006 CanLII 23950 (Ont SCJ). 40 For a good summary of the law, see White v 123627 Canada Inc, 2014 ON......
-
Table of cases
...Cat Productions Ltd v Macedo, [1985] 1 FC 269 (TD) .........................................17 Celanese Canada Inc v Murray Demolition, [2006] 2 SCR 189 ........................ 296 Table of Cases 709 Chambers v Murphy, [1953] 2 DLR 705 (Ont CA) ...................................................
-
Mahjoub v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)
...concerning the removal of solicitors discussed by the Supreme Court in Celanese Canada Inc. v. Murray Demolition Corp., 2006 SCC 36, [2006] 2 S.C.R. 189 and applied the factors discussed in that [310] Here again, the Federal Court applied correct legal principles to the facts before it. And......
Get Started for Free
8 cases
-
Mahjoub v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)
...concerning the removal of solicitors discussed by the Supreme Court in Celanese Canada Inc. v. Murray Demolition Corp., 2006 SCC 36, [2006] 2 S.C.R. 189 and applied the factors discussed in that [310] Here again, the Federal Court applied correct legal principles to the facts before it. And......
-
Denike v. Dalhousie University
...v. Ontario (Ministry of Correctional Services), [2006] 2 S.C.R. 32, 2006 SCC 31; Celanese Canada Inc. v. Murray Demolition Corp., [2006] 2 S.C.R. 189, 2006 SCC 36; Juman v. Doucette, [2008] 1 S.C.R. 157, 2008 SCC 8. A rare exception, which has no application here, is that no privilege attac......
-
State Industries Ltd. et al. v. Summers Equipment Inc. et al.
...Inc., 2017 ABCA 316 (CanLII) at paras. 45–46.  See also Celanese Canada Inc. v. Murray Demolition Corp., 2006 SCC 36, [2006] 2 S.C.R. 189. [16]      Where a party brings a motion without notice, the moving party must make full and fair disclosure of all ......
-
Greenbriar Holding Inc. et al. v. Canadian Hydrogen Energy Co.
...1. MacDonald Estate v. Martin , [1993] 3 S.C.R. 1235; [1990] S.C.J. No. 41 2. Celanese Canada Inc. v. Murray Demolition Corp. , [2006] S.C.C. 36 3. Celanese, supra at paragraph 56-59 4. Celanese, supra , at paragraph 66 5. [1992] F.C.J. No. 858 [End of document] ...
Get Started for Free
2 firm's commentaries
-
Best Practices To Adopt In Reaction To The Unauthorized Communication Or Retrieval Of Privileged Information
...(Minister of Justice), 2006 SCC 39. 3. Celanese Canada Inc. v. Murray Demolition Corp (hereafter "Celanese"), 2006 SCC 36 (CanLII), [2006] 2 SCR 189. 4. An Anton Piller order is a specific form of civil injunctive relief which urges a defendant to permit a plaintiff to enter its property to......
-
The Civil Sheriff Comes Knocking On The Door Anton Piller Orders
...named, the AP order, which has been described by the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) in Celanese Canada Inc. v. Murray Demolition Corp., [2006] 2 S.C.R. 189 as a "private warrant," is not something one encounters every day. However, if one is on either end of such a drastic order, then it is ......
3 books & journal articles
-
Table of Cases
...77 Celanese Canada Inc. v. Murray Demolition Corp., [2006] 2 S.C.R. 189, 2006 SCC 36, 50 C.P.R. (4th) 241 ............................................................... 627 Celanese International Corp. v. BP Chemicals Ltd., [1999] R.P.C. 203 (Pat. Ct.) ...........................................
-
Privileges, Protections, and Immunities
...Ontario Court of Appeal stated: 38 Rumping v DPP , [1962] 3 All ER 256 (HL) [ Rumping ]. 39 Celanese Canada Inc v Murray Demolition , [2006] 2 SCR 189; Chan v Dynasty Executive Suites Ltd , 2006 CanLII 23950 (Ont SCJ). 40 For a good summary of the law, see White v 123627 Canada Inc, 2014 ON......
-
Table of cases
...Cat Productions Ltd v Macedo, [1985] 1 FC 269 (TD) .........................................17 Celanese Canada Inc v Murray Demolition, [2006] 2 SCR 189 ........................ 296 Table of Cases 709 Chambers v Murphy, [1953] 2 DLR 705 (Ont CA) ...................................................