Cerieco Canada Corp. v. Mizrahi
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Court | Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada) |
| Judge | Kimmel |
| Citation | 2022 ONSC 6211 |
| Date | 02 November 2022 |
| Docket Number | CV-22-00681586-00CL |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
2 practice notes
-
2694128 Ontario Inc. v. Mizrahi Commercial (the One) LP
...a motion heard by me in another action on the Commercial List involving some of the same defendants. See Cerieco Canada Corp. v. Mizrahi, 2022 ONSC 6211. Some of the claims asserted in that action were stayed because they were found to violate the standstill provision (the “Standstill Provi......
-
2637897 Ontario Limited et al. v. Toronto (Bayview Car Wash) LP et al.
...Although the wording is slightly different, the broad wording of s. 7.1(d) is similar to that found in Cerieco Canada Corp. v. Mizrahi, 2022 ONSC 6211, in which an oppression action was recognized as a “remedy” arising from an indebtedness which was prohibited by a standstill agreement. As ......
2 cases
-
2694128 Ontario Inc. v. Mizrahi Commercial (the One) LP
...a motion heard by me in another action on the Commercial List involving some of the same defendants. See Cerieco Canada Corp. v. Mizrahi, 2022 ONSC 6211. Some of the claims asserted in that action were stayed because they were found to violate the standstill provision (the “Standstill Provi......
-
2637897 Ontario Limited et al. v. Toronto (Bayview Car Wash) LP et al.
...Although the wording is slightly different, the broad wording of s. 7.1(d) is similar to that found in Cerieco Canada Corp. v. Mizrahi, 2022 ONSC 6211, in which an oppression action was recognized as a “remedy” arising from an indebtedness which was prohibited by a standstill agreement. As ......
