CHAPTER 19 Succession

Date07 April 2025
414
CH AP TE R 19
SUCCESSION
A. INTRODUCTION
In a broad sense, the topic of succession covers two areas: the adminis-
tration of the estate and the distribution of the deceased person’s prop-
erty to those benef‌icially entitled, whether under a will or on intestacy.
In a narrow sense, succession refers only to the second of these areas,
distribution, and is separate from estate administration. This chapter
covers both administration and distribution. It will generally use suc-
cession in the narrow sense.
In common law jurisdictions no one is entitled to deal with the
property of a deceased person without a grant of representation from
the courts. Such a grant will be in one of three forms: (1) a grant
of probate to those appointed in the will as executors; (2) a grant
of administration with will annexed where no executors have been
appointed by the will or where the named executors have died or
renounced their appointment; and (3) a grant of administration where
the deceased has left no will. Once appointed or recognized by the
courts, the personal representative is under a duty to gather in the
deceased’s assets, to pay o the estate’s debts, and to distribute any sur-
plus to those who are benef‌icially entitled. In this process, the courts
distinguish between matters of administration and matters of distri-
bution. The law governing the administration is the law of the coun-
try that appointed the personal representative. The law governing the
distribution is, in general, the law of the last domicile of the deceased
in the case of movable property and the law of the situs in the case of
immovable property.
Succession 415
B. ADMINISTRATION OF ESTATES
1) Local Grants of Representation
Traditionally, the presence of local assets was required for a local grant
of representation. The courts were, therefore, called on to locate assets
for the purpose of the administration of an estate. It was easy to locate
tangible property but the court had to develop rules for the situs of intan-
gible property in this context.1 Legislation, however, has broadened the
courts’ jurisdiction. In the United Kingdom, this expansion occurred
by virtue of section 2 of the Administration of Justice Act 1932.2 Equally,
provincial statutes now allow for grants of representation even though
the deceased left no assets in the province. Ontario’s Estates Act, for
example, provides that an application for a grant of representation shall
be made to the court of the district in which the deceased had a f‌ixed
place of abode at the time of death.3 If the deceased had no f‌ixed place
of abode in Ontario at the time of death then the application should be
made in a district where the deceased left property.4 The statute also
states that, in any other case, an application may be made to the court of
any district.5 Normally, there would be no point in applying for a grant of
representation where the deceased did not reside in and left no property
in the province. It has been suggested that one such case would be where
the deceased died domiciled in the province.6 In Alberta, it is specif‌ically
provided that when the deceased neither died resident nor left property
in the province, the court may stay the proceedings.7
An estate with property in multiple jurisdictions cannot be admin-
istered as a whole. There must be separate administrations of an estate
in each jurisdiction in which the deceased left assets. Thus, a provin-
cial grant of representation is eective only in respect of property of
the deceased located in that province. The common law draws a dis-
tinction between the principal administration, which takes place in the
country of the deceased’s domicile, and ancillary administrations, which
take place in all other jurisdictions where the deceased left property. In
an attempt to coordinate the administration of an entire estate, local
1 See, generally, Chapter 16.
2 (UK), 22 & 23 Geo 5, c 55.
3 RSO 1990, c E.21, s 7(1).
4 Ibid, s 7(2).
5 Ibid, s 7(3).
6 Janet Walker, Canadian Conf‌lict of Laws, 7th ed (Markham, ON: LexisNexis Can-
ada Inc, 2023) (loose-leaf) at para 24.01(4)(a).
7 Estate Administration Act, SA 2014, c E-12.5, s 2(2).

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex