CHARLES CATTLE CO. LTD. v. HERRIMAN, 2017 SKQB 325
| Judge | KALMAKOFF |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada) |
| Case Date | October 30, 2017 |
| Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
| Citations | 2017 SKQB 325 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 practice notes
-
Specific Performance: Discretionary Defences and Considerations that Affect Discretion
...737 (CA), leave to appeal to SCC refused [1997] SCCA No 191; Benzie v Hania, 2012 ONCA 766 at para 67; Charles Cattle Co Ltd v Herriman , 2017 SKQB 325 at para 16. 159 In Ontario, see Courts of Justice Act , above note 157, s 103(6)(a)(ii). 160 See Chippewas of Kettle & Stony Point v Canada......
-
Table of cases
...v United Kingdom, [1989] 1 FSR 617 (ECHR) ................................... 249 Table of Cases 731 Charles Cattle Co Ltd v Herriman, 2017 SKQB 325 ...........................................477 Charrington v Simons & Co, [1971] 1 WLR 598, [1971] 2 All ER 588, 2 2 P & CR 558 (CA) ...............
-
Zelinski v Zelinski,
...a contractual right that only takes effect when a vendor accepts an offer to purchase from a third party (Charles Cattle Co. v. Herriman, 2017 SKQB 325 at para 16). It does not create an interest in the land, and does not attach to the land (Powers v Walter, (1981) 9 Sask R 89 at para 9 (SK......
-
FAER v. KRUG,
...In Charles Cattle Co. Ltd. v Herriman, 2017 SKQB 325, 77 BLR (5th) 89, Kalmakoff J. (as he then was) noted that the aim in interpreting contracts is to determine the intent of the parties and the scope of their understanding. Consideration of the circumstances surrounding the making of the ......
2 cases
-
Zelinski v Zelinski,
...a contractual right that only takes effect when a vendor accepts an offer to purchase from a third party (Charles Cattle Co. v. Herriman, 2017 SKQB 325 at para 16). It does not create an interest in the land, and does not attach to the land (Powers v Walter, (1981) 9 Sask R 89 at para 9 (SK......
-
FAER v. KRUG,
...In Charles Cattle Co. Ltd. v Herriman, 2017 SKQB 325, 77 BLR (5th) 89, Kalmakoff J. (as he then was) noted that the aim in interpreting contracts is to determine the intent of the parties and the scope of their understanding. Consideration of the circumstances surrounding the making of the ......
2 books & journal articles
-
Specific Performance: Discretionary Defences and Considerations that Affect Discretion
...737 (CA), leave to appeal to SCC refused [1997] SCCA No 191; Benzie v Hania, 2012 ONCA 766 at para 67; Charles Cattle Co Ltd v Herriman , 2017 SKQB 325 at para 16. 159 In Ontario, see Courts of Justice Act , above note 157, s 103(6)(a)(ii). 160 See Chippewas of Kettle & Stony Point v Canada......
-
Table of cases
...v United Kingdom, [1989] 1 FSR 617 (ECHR) ................................... 249 Table of Cases 731 Charles Cattle Co Ltd v Herriman, 2017 SKQB 325 ...........................................477 Charrington v Simons & Co, [1971] 1 WLR 598, [1971] 2 All ER 588, 2 2 P & CR 558 (CA) ...............