Cheema v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 1055
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Citation | 2020 FC 1055 |
| Date | 13 November 2020 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 practice notes
-
Li v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1461
...considered it in the analysis, and addressed it in the Decision as required (Cheema v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 1055 at para 26; see also Ruszo v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 296 at paras 11-12). Having considered the RPD decision, the Office......
-
Nkwo v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1616
...legal tests. This Court has been reluctant to issue directed verdicts in the PRRA context (Cheema v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 1055 at paras 57-59). [20] Due to a misunderstanding of two legal tests, the Officer failed to consider potentially relevant evidence. While the ......
-
Islam v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2021 FC 108
...deference (Conde v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2013 FC 1059 at para 25; Cheema v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 1055 at para 6). [16] In this case, it was open to the panel to find that the applicant’s multiple versions of the facts as to how the references t......
-
Scotland v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 512
...rebut the findings of the RPD because an officer is not bound by the findings of the RPD (Cheema v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 1055 [per McHaffie J] at para 26 [Cheema]). However, I note on a more fulsome reading that para 26 of Cheema states: [26] The first possibility is......
4 cases
-
Li v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1461
...considered it in the analysis, and addressed it in the Decision as required (Cheema v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 1055 at para 26; see also Ruszo v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 296 at paras 11-12). Having considered the RPD decision, the Office......
-
Nkwo v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1616
...legal tests. This Court has been reluctant to issue directed verdicts in the PRRA context (Cheema v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 1055 at paras 57-59). [20] Due to a misunderstanding of two legal tests, the Officer failed to consider potentially relevant evidence. While the ......
-
Islam v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2021 FC 108
...deference (Conde v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2013 FC 1059 at para 25; Cheema v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 1055 at para 6). [16] In this case, it was open to the panel to find that the applicant’s multiple versions of the facts as to how the references t......
-
Scotland v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 512
...rebut the findings of the RPD because an officer is not bound by the findings of the RPD (Cheema v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 1055 [per McHaffie J] at para 26 [Cheema]). However, I note on a more fulsome reading that para 26 of Cheema states: [26] The first possibility is......