CHERNICK v. CHERNICK, 2020 SKQB 168
| Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
| Judge | ROBERTSON |
| Citation | 2020 SKQB 168 |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada) |
| Docket Number | QBG 1496 of 2019 |
| Date | 10 June 2020 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 practice notes
-
STANDING BUFFALO DAKOTA FIRST NATION v. RON S. MAURICE PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION OPERATING AS MAURICE LAW BARRISTERS AND SOLICITORS,
...This matter is not yet at the case management stage nor are we finished the first stage of the process. As stated in Chernick v Chernick, 2020 SKQB 168: 18 The chambers judge at the first step will not order the summary judgment application to be scheduled for ......
-
METIS NATION – SASKATCHEWAN AND METIS NATION – SASKATCHEWAN SECRETARIAT INC. v. GOVERNMENT OF SASKATCHEWAN (MINISTER OF ENVIRONMENT),
...Applications effective November 1. 2019. The purpose and application of this Practice Directive are reviewed in Chernick v Chernick, 2020 SKQB 168 at paras 11-22. It contemplates a two-step process for judicial review applications. At the first stage, the application is reviewed to determin......
-
ATRIUM MORTGAGE INVESTMENT CORPORATION v. KOH, 2020 SKQB 179
...which was effective on November 1, 2019. The purpose and requirements of Practice Directive #9 are reviewed in Chernick v Chernick, 2020 SKQB 168. [35] Practice Directive #9 was intended to address problems experienced by the court hearing summary judgment and judicial review applications. ......
-
KUFFNER v. JACQUES (ESTATE),
...As set out in cases such as Chernick v Chernick, 2020 SKQB 168 at para 24 [Chernick], chambers judges have utilized a practice under General Application Practice Directive #9 [GA-PD#9] of requiring all materials, including briefs of law, to be filed before a request is made of the Local Reg......
Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
-
STANDING BUFFALO DAKOTA FIRST NATION v. RON S. MAURICE PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION OPERATING AS MAURICE LAW BARRISTERS AND SOLICITORS,
...This matter is not yet at the case management stage nor are we finished the first stage of the process. As stated in Chernick v Chernick, 2020 SKQB 168: 18 The chambers judge at the first step will not order the summary judgment application to be scheduled for ......
-
METIS NATION – SASKATCHEWAN AND METIS NATION – SASKATCHEWAN SECRETARIAT INC. v. GOVERNMENT OF SASKATCHEWAN (MINISTER OF ENVIRONMENT),
...Applications effective November 1. 2019. The purpose and application of this Practice Directive are reviewed in Chernick v Chernick, 2020 SKQB 168 at paras 11-22. It contemplates a two-step process for judicial review applications. At the first stage, the application is reviewed to determin......
-
ATRIUM MORTGAGE INVESTMENT CORPORATION v. KOH, 2020 SKQB 179
...which was effective on November 1, 2019. The purpose and requirements of Practice Directive #9 are reviewed in Chernick v Chernick, 2020 SKQB 168. [35] Practice Directive #9 was intended to address problems experienced by the court hearing summary judgment and judicial review applications. ......
-
KUFFNER v. JACQUES (ESTATE),
...As set out in cases such as Chernick v Chernick, 2020 SKQB 168 at para 24 [Chernick], chambers judges have utilized a practice under General Application Practice Directive #9 [GA-PD#9] of requiring all materials, including briefs of law, to be filed before a request is made of the Local Reg......
Request a trial to view additional results