CHP v. City of Hamilton, 2018 ONSC 3690
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Judge | MESBUR, VARPIO, and MYERS JJ. |
| Citation | 2018 ONSC 3690 |
| Date | 04 October 2018 |
| Court | Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada) |
| Docket Number | DC-16-753 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 practice notes
-
Troller v. Manitoba Public Insurance Corporation, 2019 MBQB 157
...opinions, beliefs and expressions no matter how unpopular, distasteful or contrary to the mainstream. (See CHP v. City of Hamilton, 2018 ONSC 3690 (at para. 39); Edmonton Journal (The) v. Alberta (Attorney General), [1989] 2 S.C.R. 1326 (at para. 78); Committee for the Commonwealth of Canad......
-
Alberta March for Life Association v Edmonton (City),
...decision demanding certain procedural safeguards, including notice and an opportunity to be heard. They rely on CHP v Hamilton (City), 2018 ONSC 3690 [CHP] where a municipality’s decision to remove political advertisements seen as discriminatory towards members of the transgende......
-
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc. v. City of Toronto, 2020 ONSC 2356
...section 2(b) rights under the Charter. Relying on this Court’s decision in Christian Heritage Party of Hamilton v. City of Hamilton, 2018 ONSC 3690 (Div. Ct.), they argue that the decision-making process that led to the removal of the ads was unfair because PETA was not notified before the ......
-
Guelph and Area Right to Life v. City of Guelph,
...as little as possible in all of the circumstances”. [55] In CHP v. City of Hamilton, 2018 ONSC 3690 (Div. Ct.), this Court dealt with another circumstance in which a municipality decided to remove advertisements that challenged equality right......
Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
-
Troller v. Manitoba Public Insurance Corporation, 2019 MBQB 157
...opinions, beliefs and expressions no matter how unpopular, distasteful or contrary to the mainstream. (See CHP v. City of Hamilton, 2018 ONSC 3690 (at para. 39); Edmonton Journal (The) v. Alberta (Attorney General), [1989] 2 S.C.R. 1326 (at para. 78); Committee for the Commonwealth of Canad......
-
Alberta March for Life Association v Edmonton (City),
...decision demanding certain procedural safeguards, including notice and an opportunity to be heard. They rely on CHP v Hamilton (City), 2018 ONSC 3690 [CHP] where a municipality’s decision to remove political advertisements seen as discriminatory towards members of the transgende......
-
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc. v. City of Toronto, 2020 ONSC 2356
...section 2(b) rights under the Charter. Relying on this Court’s decision in Christian Heritage Party of Hamilton v. City of Hamilton, 2018 ONSC 3690 (Div. Ct.), they argue that the decision-making process that led to the removal of the ads was unfair because PETA was not notified before the ......
-
Guelph and Area Right to Life v. City of Guelph,
...as little as possible in all of the circumstances”. [55] In CHP v. City of Hamilton, 2018 ONSC 3690 (Div. Ct.), this Court dealt with another circumstance in which a municipality decided to remove advertisements that challenged equality right......
Request a trial to view additional results