Ciardullo v. 1832 Asset Management L.P., et al.

JurisdictionOntario
CourtOntario Superior Court of Justice
JudgeAkbarali
Citation2023 ONSC 4466
Docket NumberCV-22-685386-00CP; CV-22-684723-00CP; CV-22-690373-00CP; CV-22-690374-00CP; CV-22-690519-00CP; CV-22-691343-00CP; CV-22-691344-00CP; CV-23-697428-00CP
Date01 August 2023

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
2 practice notes
  • Aizic v. Natcan Trust Company
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • October 22, 2025
    ...J.A.” “I agree. R. Pomerance J.A.” [1] Class Proceedings Act, 1992, S.O. 1992, c. 6. [2] Ciardullo v. 1832 Asset Management L.P., et al., 2023 ONSC 4466. The temporary stay was granted, but the reasons contemplated that the appellants could seek to lift the stay to bring a summary judgment ......
  • Yeats v. BMO Investments Inc. et al.
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • November 5, 2024
    ...I heard a motion to stay the 2022 actions brought by the plaintiffs in the 2018 actions: Ciardullo v. 1832 Asset Management L.P. et al., 2023 ONSC 4466. In my reasons, I noted that the actions raised a common factual matrix. The plaintiffs in the 2022 actions candidly admitted copying large......
2 cases
  • Aizic v. Natcan Trust Company
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • October 22, 2025
    ...J.A.” “I agree. R. Pomerance J.A.” [1] Class Proceedings Act, 1992, S.O. 1992, c. 6. [2] Ciardullo v. 1832 Asset Management L.P., et al., 2023 ONSC 4466. The temporary stay was granted, but the reasons contemplated that the appellants could seek to lift the stay to bring a summary judgment ......
  • Yeats v. BMO Investments Inc. et al.
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • November 5, 2024
    ...I heard a motion to stay the 2022 actions brought by the plaintiffs in the 2018 actions: Ciardullo v. 1832 Asset Management L.P. et al., 2023 ONSC 4466. In my reasons, I noted that the actions raised a common factual matrix. The plaintiffs in the 2022 actions candidly admitted copying large......