CIBA-Geigy Canada Ltd. v. Apotex Inc., (1991) 135 N.R. 76 (Motion)
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Judge | L'Heureux-Dubé, Gonthier and Iacobucci, JJ. |
| Subject Matter | PRACTICE |
| Citation | (1991), 135 N.R. 76 (Motion),80 DLR (4th) 134,2 BLR (2d) 1,7 CBR (3d) 275,1991 CanLII 105 (SCC),[1991] 1 SCR 1059 |
| Court | Supreme Court (Canada) |
| Date | 16 May 1991 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 practice notes
-
Dialogue in Practice: 2001-2016
...into both judicial decisions and governmental responses to those decisions. Proportionality-based reasoning, whether conducted under sections 1 or 7 of the Charter , facilitates dialogue by basing judicial decisions on acceptance of most of the govern-ment’s objectives, but then requiring t......
-
Lignes aériennes Canadien International Ltée c. Canada (Commission des droits de la personne) (C.A.F.),
...Les appelantes ont droit à leurs dépens. 1 Rothmans, Benson & Hedges Inc. c. Canada (Procureur général), [1990] 1 C.F. 7 4 (1re inst.), aux p. 79 à 83; Rothmans, Benson & Hedges Inc. c. Canada (Procureur général), [1990] 1 C.F. 84 (1re inst.), ......
-
PCL Constructors v. Johnson Controls,
...what would happen if a step was missed or happened out of order. At para. 82, he stated that “nothing in the language of sections 4.1 or 7 of the FCA elevates any Defect Dispute pre-arbitration steps to the status of true conditions precedent to the jurisdiction of the arbitrator.&#x......
2 cases
-
Lignes aériennes Canadien International Ltée c. Canada (Commission des droits de la personne) (C.A.F.),
...Les appelantes ont droit à leurs dépens. 1 Rothmans, Benson & Hedges Inc. c. Canada (Procureur général), [1990] 1 C.F. 7 4 (1re inst.), aux p. 79 à 83; Rothmans, Benson & Hedges Inc. c. Canada (Procureur général), [1990] 1 C.F. 84 (1re inst.), ......
-
PCL Constructors v. Johnson Controls,
...what would happen if a step was missed or happened out of order. At para. 82, he stated that “nothing in the language of sections 4.1 or 7 of the FCA elevates any Defect Dispute pre-arbitration steps to the status of true conditions precedent to the jurisdiction of the arbitrator.&#x......
1 books & journal articles
-
Dialogue in Practice: 2001-2016
...into both judicial decisions and governmental responses to those decisions. Proportionality-based reasoning, whether conducted under sections 1 or 7 of the Charter , facilitates dialogue by basing judicial decisions on acceptance of most of the govern-ment’s objectives, but then requiring t......