Director of Civil Forfeiture (B.C.) v. Angel Acres Recreation and Festival Property Ltd. et al., 2009 BCSC 322
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | Davies, J. |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Citation | 2009 BCSC 322,[2009] B.C.T.C. Uned. 322,[2009] B.C.T.C. Uned. 322 (SC) |
| Date | 11 March 2009 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
42 practice notes
-
Feuerhelm v Alberta (Justice and Attorney General), 2017 ABQB 709
...requires prior judicial authorization[88] In BC (Director of Civil Forfeiture) v Angel Acres Recreation and Festival Property Ltd, 2009 BCSC 322, app dism 2010 BCCA 539, Mr Justice Davies declined to rule whether only compelled testimony fell in the ambit of subsection 193(2)(a), noting the......
-
Director of Civil Forfeiture (B.C.) v. Wolff, 2012 BCCA 473
...[para. 18]. Director of Civil Forfeiture (B.C.) v. Angel Acres Recreation and Festival Property Ltd. et al., [2009] B.C.T.C. Uned. 322; 2009 BCSC 322, affd. (2010), 296 B.C.A.C. 230; 503 W.A.C. 230; 2010 BCCA 539, refd to. [para. Cook v. Lewis, [1951] S.C.R. 830, refd to. [para. 23]. Dunlop......
-
British Columbia (Director of Civil Forfeiture) v. Angel Acres Recreation and Festival Property Ltd., 2020 BCSC 880
...in Reasons for Judgment indexed as British Columbia (Director of Civil Forfeiture) v. Angel Acres Recreations and Festival Property Ltd., 2009 BCSC 322 I ordered the continuation of the IPO over the Nanaimo Clubhouse and its contents (other than the three motorcycles) on a Continuing Preser......
-
James v. Johnson & Johnson Inc., 2021 BCSC 488
...must be properly qualified: British Columbia (Director of Civil Forfeiture) v. Angel Acres Recreation & Festival Property Ltd., 2009 BCSC 322 at paras. 117-128, 138-151; aff'd 2010 BCCA 539 at paras. 40-41. Further, I agree that the court must exercise its gatekeeping function even in t......
Get Started for Free
42 cases
-
Feuerhelm v Alberta (Justice and Attorney General), 2017 ABQB 709
...requires prior judicial authorization[88] In BC (Director of Civil Forfeiture) v Angel Acres Recreation and Festival Property Ltd, 2009 BCSC 322, app dism 2010 BCCA 539, Mr Justice Davies declined to rule whether only compelled testimony fell in the ambit of subsection 193(2)(a), noting the......
-
Director of Civil Forfeiture (B.C.) v. Wolff, 2012 BCCA 473
...[para. 18]. Director of Civil Forfeiture (B.C.) v. Angel Acres Recreation and Festival Property Ltd. et al., [2009] B.C.T.C. Uned. 322; 2009 BCSC 322, affd. (2010), 296 B.C.A.C. 230; 503 W.A.C. 230; 2010 BCCA 539, refd to. [para. Cook v. Lewis, [1951] S.C.R. 830, refd to. [para. 23]. Dunlop......
-
British Columbia (Director of Civil Forfeiture) v. Angel Acres Recreation and Festival Property Ltd., 2020 BCSC 880
...in Reasons for Judgment indexed as British Columbia (Director of Civil Forfeiture) v. Angel Acres Recreations and Festival Property Ltd., 2009 BCSC 322 I ordered the continuation of the IPO over the Nanaimo Clubhouse and its contents (other than the three motorcycles) on a Continuing Preser......
-
James v. Johnson & Johnson Inc., 2021 BCSC 488
...must be properly qualified: British Columbia (Director of Civil Forfeiture) v. Angel Acres Recreation & Festival Property Ltd., 2009 BCSC 322 at paras. 117-128, 138-151; aff'd 2010 BCCA 539 at paras. 40-41. Further, I agree that the court must exercise its gatekeeping function even in t......
Get Started for Free