Clarke v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 267
Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
Date | 07 March 2018 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
Rahimi v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 237
...decisions of this Court have framed the issue as a question of procedural fairness (Clarke v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 267 at paras 9-10; Thompson v Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness, 2015 FC 808 at para 12). [38] In my view, if the Applicant was represent......
-
Johnson v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 519
...are highly analogous to those found procedurally unfair by my colleague Justice Pentney in Clarke v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 267 (“Clarke”). In Clarke, Justice Pentney stated the following at paragraphs 13 and [13] However, as the hearing unfolded it becam......
3 cases
-
Coutlee v. Lower Nicola First Nation, 2024 FC 47
...entire proceeding” (Girouard v Canada (Attorney General), 2020 FCA 129 at para 38; Clarke v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 267 at paras 8, 15; Canada (Attorney General) v McBain, 2017 FCA 204 at paras [48] The Respondent submits that the standard of review for the meri......
-
Rahimi v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 237
...decisions of this Court have framed the issue as a question of procedural fairness (Clarke v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 267 at paras 9-10; Thompson v Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness, 2015 FC 808 at para 12). [38] In my view, if the Applicant was represent......
-
Johnson v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 519
...are highly analogous to those found procedurally unfair by my colleague Justice Pentney in Clarke v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 267 (“Clarke”). In Clarke, Justice Pentney stated the following at paragraphs 13 and [13] However, as the hearing unfolded it becam......