Cohabitational Relationships
Author | Julien D. Payne/Marilyn A. Payne |
Pages | 35-54 |
3535
Chapter 3
Cohabitational Relationships
A. INTRODUCTION
Cohabitational relationships1 usually involve two people who share their
lives together but are not married to each other.2 Cohabitational relation-
ships may involve members of the opposite sex or memb ers of the same sex.
Unmarried heterose xual cohabitation is sometimes referred to a s a common
law relat ionship.
B. LEGAL CONSEQUENCES OF UNM ARRIED
COHABITATION AS COMPARED TO MARR IAGE
In previous generations, unmarried cohabitants were disentitled to t he pro-
tection of the law. By the 1980s, socia l attitudes and the law had undergone
radical ch anges, at least with respect to unmar ried cohabitants of the oppos-
ite sex. Legal recognition of same-sex cohabitants came in the 1990s as a
result of legal cha llenges made under the equality prov isions of section 15 of
the Canadian Char ter of Rights and Freedoms. e social stigma that formerly
attached to unmarried cohabitation has now largely disappeared. e law
1 See, general ly, Winifred H Holla nd & BarbroE Stalbec ker-Pountney, Cohabitation: e
Law in Canada (Toronto: Car swell, 1990–). As to t he possibility of e xtending legal r ights
and obligation s to a broader range of person al relationships , see Law Commission of
Canada, D iscussion Paper, “Rec ognizing and Sup porting Close Perso nal Relationsh ips
Between Adults,” online: www.lcc.gc.ca.
2 But see John-Paul Boyd , “Polyamorous Relat ionships and Family L aw in Canada”
Canadian Resea rch Institute for Law and the Fa mily (April 2017) and John -Paul Boyd,
“Perceptions of Polya mory in Canad a” Canadian Research Instit ute for Law and the Family
(December 2017).
Canadi an family law36
has, neverthele ss, been piecemeal in its response to unmar ried cohabitation.
It does not generally assimi late the consequences of marri age and unmarried
cohabitation, but legal recognition has been extended to u nmarried cohabit-
ation in a wide variety of contexts in lig ht of the judgments of the Supreme
Court of Canada in Miron v Trudel3 and M v H.4 In consequence of M v H,
federal, provincial, and territorial statutes have established diverse rights
and obligations as between unmarried cohabitants of the opposite sex and
unmarried cohabitants of the same sex. In July 2000, the federal govern-
ment passed omnibus legislation, titled the Moder nization of Obligations and
Benets Act, which amended sixty statutes for the purpose of assimilating
the rights and obligations of same-sex couples and opposite-sex couples. In
1999, Ontario enacted t he Amendments Because of the Supreme Court of Canada
Decision in M v H Act,5 which amended t he Family Law Act so that its support
provisions apply to same-sex couples as well as opposite-sex couples. e
provisions of the Family Law Act with respect to cohabitation agreements,
separation agreements, and claims for damages by family dependants were
also amended to include same-sex cohabitants. Various other rights and
obligations under Ontario statutes were also extended to same-sex couples,
namely, the Change of Name Act,6 the Child and Family Services Act,7 the Chil-
dren’s Law Reform Act,8 the Courts of Justice Act,9 the Family Responsibility
and Support Orders Arrears Enforcement Act, 1996,10 the Pension Benets Act,11
and the Success ion Law Reform Act.12 It is noteworthy, however, that spousal
property rights and intestate succession rights in Ontario have not been
extended to either same-sex or opposite-sex unmarried cohabitants.13 In
3 [1995] 2 SCR 18 (spouse jud icially rede ned pursuant to s15 of the Canadian Charter
of Rights and Freedoms to i nclude unmarr ied heterosexua l cohabitants of three y ears’
standing u nder automobile insura nce policy).
4 [1999] 2 SCR 3 (assimi lation of statutory su pport rights of coha bitants of the same sex
with those of coh abitants of opposite se x); and see Section D, below i n this chapter.
With respect t o former unmarr ied cohabitants of the op posite sex, compare Quebec
(Attorney General) v A, 2 013 SCC 5, below in this sec tion.
5 SO 1999, c 6.
6 RSO 1990, c C.7.
7 RSO 1990, c C.1 1.
8 RSO 1990, c C.12.
9 SO 1994, c 12.
10SO 1996, c 31.
11RSO 199 0, c P.8.
12RSO 1990, c S.2 6.
13See the den ition of “spouse” in sec tion 1 of the Succession Law Refor m Act, RSO 1990, cS.26
and see Lorne H Wol fson & Carol A Dalgado, “S ome oughts on Family and E states
Matters After M v H (Part I)” ( February 2000) 15 Money & Fam ily Law at 9–12; L orne H
Wolfson & Carol A Da lgado, “Some oughts on Fam ily and Estates Matte rs After M v H
To continue reading
Request your trialUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
