Comment in response to the Draft Model Conscientious Objection Policy.

• Author: Robert, Yves
• Position: English translation of French text - Quebec

Note

The timeframe did not allow for submission of the draft to the decision makers of the College des midecins du Quebec and its translation. The following comments are therefore presented in French and represent the views of the authors.

Introduction

Thank you for the invitation to comment on this article. Conscientious objection is certainly a current topic of significant importance. The debates raging in Quebec on a potential secular charter and ongoing discussions of end-of-life care, not to mention recurrent federal debates on abortion, attest to this. The College des midecins du Quebec (CMQ) is directly affected by this article, since the proposal of a conscientious objection policy is specifically addressed to medical regulatory bodies in each of the provinces and territories of Canada.

The fact that the CMQ is already at the heart of this policy, however, creates a bias that should be admitted from the outset. Our perception of the current situation and the necessity of a better policy is certainly not the same as that of the authors of the article, and a lengthy discussion would be required to cover these divergent points of view properly.

We will limit ourselves here to a few comments that may provide further food for thought.

1. Confusion

   We would first like to correct certain statements that seem to us to be more or less fair, as to the immense confusion almost everywhere in Canada concerning conscientious objection as well as those responsible for the policy for physicians. We feel that they reveal an insufficient knowledge of several particularities in Quebec.

   The geopolitical reality in Canada being what it is, jurisdictional disputes are all too common. However, the professional regulation of physicians is clearly a matter of provincial jurisdiction in Quebec. All physicians must be members of the CMQ to practice in the province, and it has complete jurisdiction over their professional...