Commissions and Inquiries: Themes and Variations
| Author | Jonathan Rudin |
| Pages | 9-55 |
9
Commissions
and Inquiries:
Themes and
Variations
2
I. Royal Commission on the Donald Marshall Jr Prosecution (1989) ........... 11
II. Osnaburgh Windigo Tribal Justice Review (1990) ......................... 12
III. Justice on Trial—Report of the Task Force on theCriminal Justice System
and Its Impact on the Indian and Métis People of Alberta (1991) ........... 14
IV. Law Reform Commission of Canada: Report onAboriginal Peoples and
Criminal Justice—Equality, Respect and the Search for Justice (1991) ......... 17
V. Aboriginal Justice Inquiry of Manitoba (1991) ............................ 19
VI. Reports of the Saskatchewan Indian and Métis Justice Review Committees
(1992) ............................................................ 23
VII. Cariboo-Chilcotin Justice Inquiry (1993) ................................. 25
VIII. Justice for and by the Aboriginals (1995) ................................ 27
IX. Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples—Bridging the Cultural Divide:
A Report on Aboriginal People and Criminal Justice in Canada (1996) ........ 29
X. Aboriginal Justice Implementation Commission (2001) .................... 31
XI. Saskatchewan Commission on First Nations and Métis People and Justice
Reform (2004) ..................................................... 33
XII. First Nations Representation on Ontario’s Juries: A Report of the Independent
Review Conducted by the Honourable Frank Iacobucci (2013) ............... 34
XIII. Honouring the Truth, Reconciling for the Future: Summary of the Final Report
of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada (2015) .............. 36
XIV. Reclaiming Power and Place: The Final Report of the National Inquiry into
Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women and Girls (2019) ............... 40
XV. Public Inquiry Commission on Relations Between Indigenous Peoples
and Certain Public Services in Quebec: Listening, Reconciliation and
Progress(2019) .................................................... 43
XVI. The Overarching Themes—Overrepresentation and Colonialism ............ 46
Copyright © 2022 Emond Montgomery Publications. All Rights Reserved.
10 Indigenous People and the Criminal Justice System
Recognition by provincial and federal governments that the justice system does not
serve the needs of Indigenous people predates the decision by the Supreme Court of
Canada in R v Gladue1 in 1999 and even the introduction of section 718.2(e) into the
Criminal Code2 in 1996. Indeed, both those developments may not have occurred at
all without commissions and inquiries having looked at this issue in detail.
From 1989 to the present, 15 commissions and inquiries examined the way the jus-
tice system works, or does not work, for Indigenous people.3 The inquiries cover most
of the country. Four were federal and 11 were provincial—one from Nova Scotia, two
from Quebec, two from Ontario, two from Manitoba, two from Saskatchewan, and
one each from Alberta and British Columbia.
These commissions and inquiries made 731 recommendations relevant to the
issues in this book.4 Determining which of these recommendations were actually
implemented is impossible because there has not been much in the way of publicly
reported follow-ups to the recommendations. The only exception is the Aboriginal
Justice Implementation Commission of Manitoba, which reported on the status of the
recommendations of the Aboriginal Justice Inquiry of Manitoba. The Commission
itself made 60 recommendations, and the status of those remains unclear.
This chapter will briefly review each of the 15 commissions and inquiries and will
highlight the significant recommendations from each as they relate to the operation of
the criminal justice system. It is important to look at these commissions and inquiries
and their recommendations for two reasons. First, the issues these reports highlight
are still significant and, sadly, largely unaddressed. For people working with Indigen-
ous people in the criminal justice system, the insights from those who have studied
these issues in depth is valuable, and learning what is or is not happening in one’s
own backyard is crucial. Second, themes that emerge from these commissions and
inquiries are important to understand. These themes, which will be discussed at the
1 [1999] 1 SCR 688, 1999 CanLII 679 [Gladue].
2 RSC 1985, cC-46 [Code].
3 The focus in this chapter is on commissions and inquiries that looked at the relationship
between Indigenous people and the criminal justice system. Those reports that looked primar-
ily at relations between Indigenous people and police—for example, Alone and Cold in British
Columbia (British Columbia, Alone and Cold: Davies Commission—Inquiry into the Death of
Frank Paul—Interim Report (Vancouver: The Davies Commission, 2009)); the Neil Stonechild
Commission report in Saskatchewan (Saskatchewan, Report of the Commission of Inquiry into
Matters Relating to the Death of Neil Stonechild (Regina: The Commission of Inquiry into Mat-
ters Relating to the Death of Neil Stonechild, 2004)); and the Ipperwash Inquiry report in
Ontario (Ontario, Report of the Ipperwash Inquiry (Toronto: The Ipperwash Inquiry, 2007))—
are not included here.
4 The commissions and inquiries examined here made many more than 731 recommendations,
but this number reflects those that primarily relate to Indigenous people and the operation of
the criminal justice system.
Copyright © 2022 Emond Montgomery Publications. All Rights Reserved.
Chapter 2 Commissions and Inquiries: Themes and Variations 11
end of the chapter, will animate much of the discussion through the rest of the book
and therefore deserve attention at the outset.
I. Royal Commission on the Donald Marshall Jr
Prosecution (1989)
Donald Marshall Jr, who was Mi’kmaq, and Sandy Seale, who was Black, both 17
years of age, were in Wentworth Park in Sydney, Nova Scotia, on May 28, 1971.
Around midnight, they approached Roy Ebsary and Jimmy MacNeil, and panhan-
dled. Moments later, Sandy Seale was stabbed in the stomach, and Donald Marshall
was cut on the arm. Seale died the next day.5
On June 4, 1971, Marshall was charged with murder in relation to Seale’s death.
After a three-day trial from November 2-5, 1971, he was convicted, and the conviction
was armed on appeal. Marshall always maintained his innocence, and after spend-
ing 11 years in jail, he was finally exonerated. Ebsary was convicted of manslaughter
for Seale’s death in 1983 and served a year in prison.
A royal commission was called by the government of Nova Scotia to look into the
wrongful prosecution of Marshall. The Commission was chaired by Alexander Hick-
man, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Newfoundland, and had as commissioners
Lawrence Poitras, Associate Chief Justice of the Quebec Superior Court, and Gregory
Evans, formerly Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Ontario. Justice Poitras later
became Chief Justice of the Quebec Superior Court, and Evans continued to serve as
Integrity Commissioner for Ontario. The Commission reported in 1989.
The first finding of the Commission was as follows:
The criminal justice system failed Donald Marshall, Jr at virtually every turn from his
arrest and wrongful conviction for murder in 1971 up to, and even beyond, his acquittal
by the Court of Appeal in 1983. The tragedy of the failure is compounded by evidence
that this miscarriage of justice could—and should—have been prevented, or at least
corrected quickly, if those involved in the system had carried out their duties in a profes-
sional and/or competent manner. That they did not is due, in part at least, to the fact
that Donald Marshall, Jr is a Native.6
The Commission made many recommendations that touched on all aspects of the
operation of the justice system in Nova Scotia and in Canada. The recommendations
dealt with wrongful convictions, the administration of criminal justice in the prov-
ince, and policing. The Commission also made recommendations regarding ensuring
5 Nova Scotia, Royal Commission on the Donald Marshall, Jr, Prosecution: Digest of Findings and
Recommendations (Halifax: Royal Commission on the Donald Marshall, Jr, Prosecution, 1989)
at 2.
6 Ibid at 1.
Copyright © 2022 Emond Montgomery Publications. All Rights Reserved.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations