Consolidated-Bathurst Export Ltd. v. Mutual Boiler and Machinery Insurance Co., (1979) 32 N.R. 488 (SCC)
Judge | Martland, Ritchie, Pigeon, Dickson, Beetz, Estey and McIntyre, JJ. |
Court | Supreme Court of Canada |
Case Date | Friday December 21, 1979 |
Jurisdiction | Canada (Federal) |
Citations | (1979), 32 N.R. 488 (SCC);[1979] SCJ No 133 (QL);10 BLR 236;1979 CanLII 10 (SCC);AZ-80113064;1979 CanLII 188 (SCC);[1979] ACS no 133;112 DLR (3d) 49;[1980] 1 SCR 783;40 NSR (2d) 259;14 RPR 252;1 ACWS (2d) 169;[1980] 1 SCR 888;[1980] ILR 1;32 NR 488;29 OR (2d) 720;[1979] CarswellQue 157;73 APR 259 |
Consol.-Bathurst v. Mut. Boiler Ins. Co. (1979), 32 N.R. 488 (SCC)
MLB headnote and full text
Consolidated-Bathurst Export Ltd. v. Mutual Boiler and Machinery Insurance Co.
Indexed As: Consolidated-Bathurst Export Ltd. v. Mutual Boiler and Machinery Insurance Co.
Supreme Court of Canada
Martland, Ritchie, Pigeon, Dickson, Beetz, Estey and McIntyre, JJ.
December 21, 1979.
Summary:
This case arose out of a claim by a manufacturer under a business accident insurance policy. Due to corrosion in the pipes in 3 heat exchangers the manufacturer's plant was shut down and the manufacturer suffered consequential losses of $158,289. The insurer refused the manufacturer's claim because the policy defined accident so as to exclude damage caused by corrosion. The trial court dismissed the manufacturer's action against the insurer. The manufacturer appealed to the Quebec Court of Appeal.
The Quebec Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal. The manufacturer appealed to the Supreme Court of Canada.
The Supreme Court of Canada allowed the appeal, set aside the judgments of the Quebec courts and directed judgment in favour of the manufacturer for $158,289. The Supreme Court of Canada held that the insurer was liable because the exclusionary clause did not specifically exclude indirect or consequential losses caused by corrosion.
Ritchie, Martland and McIntyre, JJ., dissenting, in the Supreme Court of Canada, would have dismissed the appeal and would have affirmed the judgment of the Quebec Court of Appeal.
Insurance - Topic 5370
Property insurance - Business accident insurance - Exclusions - A paper products manufacturer insured its property against loss caused by accident - Due to the corrosion of pipes in 3 heat exchangers the manufacturer's plant was shut down and the manufacturer suffered consequential losses of $158,289 - The Supreme Court of Canada held that the insurer was liable for the insured's consequential losses because an exclusionary clause, while excluding corrosion from the meaning of "accident", did not specifically exclude indirect or consequential losses caused by corrosion.
Insurance - Topic 1858
The insurance contract - Interpretation of contract - Ambiguity, construction to produce a fair result - The Supreme Court of Canada stated that in determining the intention of the parties to an insurance contract, if the words will bear two constructions, then the words should be interpreted to produce a reasonable, sensible and fair result (see paragraphs 12 and 41).
Insurance - Topic 1861
The insurance contract - Interpretation of the contract - Contra proferentem rule - The Supreme Court of Canada referred to the contra proferentem doctrine and stated that an exception or limitation drafted by an insurer which creates a doubt in its application should be construed against the insurer (see paragraphs 11 and 40).
Cases Noticed:
Pense v. Northern Life Assurance Co. (1907), 15 O.L.R. 131 (C.A.), refd to. [paras. 11 and 40].
Indemnity Insurance Company of North America v. Excel Cleaning Service, [1954] S.C.R. 169, refd to. [paras. 11 and 40], dist. [paras. 26 and 55].
Stevenson v. Reliance Petroleum Limited; Reliance Petroleum Limited v. Canadian General Insurance Company, [1956] S.C.R. 936, refd to. [paras. 11, 25, 40 and 54].
Cornish v. Accident Insurance Company (1889), 23 Q.B. 453 (C.A.), refd to. [paras. 11 and 40].
Authors and Works Noticed:
Cheshire and Fifoot's Law of Contract, 9th ed., page 152 [paras. 11 and 40].
Counsel:
Guy Desjardins, Q.C., for the appellant;
Marcel Cinq-Mars, Q.C., for the respondent.
This appeal was heard by MARTLAND, RITCHIE, PIGEON, DICKSON, BEETZ, ESTEY and McINTYRE, JJ. of the Supreme Court of Canada at Ottawa, Ontario on March 13, 1979.
The judgment of the Supreme Court of Canada was delivered on December 21, 1979 and the following opinions were filed:
ESTEY, J. - see paragraphs 1 to 15 (English language judgment) and paragraphs 30 to 44 (French language judgment).
RITCHIE, J., dissenting - see paragraphs 16 to 29 (English language judgment) and paragraphs 45 to 58 (French language judgment).
PIGEON, DICKSON and BEETZ, JJ. concurred with ESTEY, J.
MARTLAND and McINTYRE, JJ. concurred with RITCHIE, J.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Ledcor Construction Ltd. v. Northbridge Indemnity Insurance Co., 2016 SCC 37
...London v. Scalera, 2000 SCC 24, [2000] 1 S.C.R. 551; Consolidated‑Bathurst Export Ltd. v. Mutual Boiler and Machinery Insurance Co., [1980] 1 S.C.R. 888; Commonwealth Construction Co. v. Imperial Oil Ltd., [1978] 1 S.C.R. 317; Guarantee Co. of North America v. Gordon Capital Corp., [1999] 3......
-
Mosten Investments LP v The Manufacturers Life Insurance Company (Manulife Financial),, 2021 SKCA 36
...Ltd., [1998] 2 SCR 129 at paras 54 and 56 [Eli Lilly]; Consolidated-Bathurst Export Ltd. v Mutual Boiler and Machinery Insurance Co., [1980] 1 SCR 888 at 901 [Consolidated-Bathurst]; Gilchrist v Western Star Trucks Inc., 2000 BCCA 70 at para 17, 73 BCLR (3d) 102 [Gilchrist]; Davidson v Alle......
-
Spina v. Shoppers Drug Mart Inc.,
...based on the data provided by Mr. Mariano. [110] Consolidated-Bathurst Export Ltd v. Mutual Boiler & Machinery Insurance Co., [1980] 1 S.C.R. 888. [111] Sattva Capital Corp. v. Creston Moly Corp., 2014 SCC 53; Canada Square Corp. v. VS Services Ltd. (1981), 34 O.R. (2d) 250 (C.A.); ......
-
Benfield Corporate Risk Canada Ltd. v. Beaufort International Insurance Inc. et al., 2013 ABCA 200
...1; 532 W.A.C. 1; 2011 ABCA 18, refd to. [para. 174]. Consolidated-Bathurst Export Ltd. v. Mutual Boiler and Machinery Insurance Co., [1980] 1 S.C.R. 888; 32 N.R. 488, refd to. [para. 175]. Tercon Contractors Ltd. v. British Columbia (Minister of Transportation and Highways), [2010] 1 S.C.R.......
-
Ledcor Construction Ltd. v. Northbridge Indemnity Insurance Co., 2016 SCC 37
...London v. Scalera, 2000 SCC 24, [2000] 1 S.C.R. 551; Consolidated‑Bathurst Export Ltd. v. Mutual Boiler and Machinery Insurance Co., [1980] 1 S.C.R. 888; Commonwealth Construction Co. v. Imperial Oil Ltd., [1978] 1 S.C.R. 317; Guarantee Co. of North America v. Gordon Capital Corp., [1999] 3......
-
Mosten Investments LP v The Manufacturers Life Insurance Company (Manulife Financial),, 2021 SKCA 36
...Ltd., [1998] 2 SCR 129 at paras 54 and 56 [Eli Lilly]; Consolidated-Bathurst Export Ltd. v Mutual Boiler and Machinery Insurance Co., [1980] 1 SCR 888 at 901 [Consolidated-Bathurst]; Gilchrist v Western Star Trucks Inc., 2000 BCCA 70 at para 17, 73 BCLR (3d) 102 [Gilchrist]; Davidson v Alle......
-
Spina v. Shoppers Drug Mart Inc.,
...based on the data provided by Mr. Mariano. [110] Consolidated-Bathurst Export Ltd v. Mutual Boiler & Machinery Insurance Co., [1980] 1 S.C.R. 888. [111] Sattva Capital Corp. v. Creston Moly Corp., 2014 SCC 53; Canada Square Corp. v. VS Services Ltd. (1981), 34 O.R. (2d) 250 (C.A.); ......
-
Co-operators Life Insurance Co. v. Gibbens, [2009] 3 SCR 605
...Mutual Life Insurance Co., 291 U.S. 491 (1934); Consolidated‑Bathurst Export Ltd. v. Mutual Boiler and Machinery Insurance Co., [1980] 1 S.C.R. 888; Mutual of Omaha Insurance Co. v. Stats, [1978] 2 S.C.R. 1153 ; National Bank of Greece (Canada) v. Katsikonouris, [1990] 2 S.C.R. 1029 ; C......
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (April 18 - 22, 2022)
...of Review, Ledcor Construction Ltd. v. Northbridge Indemnity Insurance Co., 2016 SCC 37, Consolidated-Bathurst v. Mutual Boiler, [1980] 1 S.C.R. 888, Reid Crowther & Partners Ltd. v. Simcoe & Erie General Insurance Co., [1993] 1 S.C.R. 252, Progressive Homes Ltd. v. Lombard General Insuranc......
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (August 30 ' September 3, 2021)
... 2009 SCC 59 , Hi-Tech Group Inc. v. Sears Canada Inc. (2001), 52 O.R. (3d) 97 (C.A.), Consolidated-Bathurst v. Mutual Boiler, [1980] 1 S.C.R. 888, United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, Local 579 v. Bradco Construction Ltd., [1993] 2 S.C.R. 316 , Canadian Premier Holdi......
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (November 11 November 15, 2019)
...Underwriters Lloyd's London v. Scalera, 2000 SCC 24, Consolidated Bathurst Export Ltd. v. Mutual Boiler & Machinery Insurance Co., [1980] 1 S.C.R. 888, Tench v. Erskine (2006), 244 N.S.R. (2d) 55, Monenco Ltd. v. Commonwealth Insurance Co., 2001 SCC 49, Cooper v. Farmers' Mutual Insuran......
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (August 30 ' September 3, 2021)
... 2009 SCC 59 , Hi-Tech Group Inc. v. Sears Canada Inc. (2001), 52 O.R. (3d) 97 (C.A.), Consolidated-Bathurst v. Mutual Boiler, [1980] 1 S.C.R. 888, United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, Local 579 v. Bradco Construction Ltd., [1993] 2 S.C.R. 316 , Canadian Premier Holdi......
-
Table of cases
...v Statesman Corp, 2007 ABCA 216 ............. 530 Consolidated Bathurst Export Ltd v Mutual Boiler & Machinery Insurance Co (1979), [1980] 1 SCR 888, [1980] ILR 595 , 1979 CanLII 10 ....................................................................................283, 284, 285, 286, ......
-
Table of cases
...356 Consolidated-Bathurst Export Ltd. v. Mutual Boiler & Machinery Insurance Co. (1979), [1980] 1 S.C.R. 888, 112 D.L.R. (3d) 49, 32 N.R. 488 ............................................745, 761, 763, 767 Consulate Ventures Inc. v. Amico Contracting, 2007 ONCA 324 ................................
-
Table Of Cases
...41 (TD) ................................................................... 772, 775 Consolidated-Bathurst v Mutual Boiler (1979), [1980] 1 SCR 888, 112 DLR (3d) 49, 1979 CanLII 10 ............................................................... 435 Consumers Distributing Co v Dart Container......
-
Table of cases
...Consolidated Bathurst Export Ltd. v. Mutual Boiler & Machinery Insurance Co., [1980] 1 S.C.R. 888, 112 D.L.R. (3d) 49 ..................................................191 Constitution Insurance Co. of Canada v. Kosmopoulos, [1987] 1 S.C.R. 2, 34 D.L.R. (4th) 208 .................................