Corke v. Andrews et al., [2015] B.C.T.C. Uned. 118 (SC)
| Judge | Joyce, J. |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Case Date | January 27, 2015 |
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Citations | [2015] B.C.T.C. Uned. 118 (SC);[2015] B.C.T.C. Uned. 118;2015 BCSC 118 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
Jahanian v. Jahanian,
...The overriding consideration when assessing non-pecuniary damages is an appreciation of the plaintiff’s loss: Corke v. Andrews, 2015 BCSC 118 at para 90, citing Lindal v. Lindal (No. 2), [1981] 2 S.C.R. 629 at [145] Non-pecuniary damages are to be assessed tak......
-
Wolford v. Shlakoff, 2017 BCSC 2043
...authorities[116] Ms. Wolford relies on Willett v. Rose, 2017 BCSC 627; Kuras; Riswold v. Goldsmith, 2014 BCSC 1207; Corke v. Andrews, 2015 BCSC 118; Lemyre v. Stubbert, 2015 BCSC 693, and Gleason v. Yoon, 2015 BCSC 586.iii. Defendants’ authorities[117] The defendants rely on Hough v. Wyatt,......
2 cases
-
Jahanian v. Jahanian,
...The overriding consideration when assessing non-pecuniary damages is an appreciation of the plaintiff’s loss: Corke v. Andrews, 2015 BCSC 118 at para 90, citing Lindal v. Lindal (No. 2), [1981] 2 S.C.R. 629 at [145] Non-pecuniary damages are to be assessed tak......
-
Wolford v. Shlakoff, 2017 BCSC 2043
...authorities[116] Ms. Wolford relies on Willett v. Rose, 2017 BCSC 627; Kuras; Riswold v. Goldsmith, 2014 BCSC 1207; Corke v. Andrews, 2015 BCSC 118; Lemyre v. Stubbert, 2015 BCSC 693, and Gleason v. Yoon, 2015 BCSC 586.iii. Defendants’ authorities[117] The defendants rely on Hough v. Wyatt,......