Coronado Resources Ltd. et al. v. Chandler et al., [2008] B.C.T.C. Uned. 368 (SC Reg.)

CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Case DateMay 30, 2008
JurisdictionBritish Columbia
Citations[2008] B.C.T.C. Uned. 368 (SC Reg.);2008 BCSC 692;[2008] B.C.T.C. Uned. 368
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 practice notes
  • Brown v. Williams, 2019 BCSC 1187
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 19 Julio 2019
    ...litigant for all work undertaken and for which compensation is not made elsewhere in the tariff: Capital Resource v. Coronado Resouces, 2008 BCSC 692. I have not had an opportunity to review the correspondence and emails and cannot, as a result, consider the purpose of these communications.......
  • Goodwin v. Ofstie et al., [2009] B.C.T.C. Uned. 137
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 9 Febrero 2009
    ...of s. 9 is discussed and reflected in Brausse v. Young, [1992] B.C.J. No. 1015, Capital Resource Group Inc. v. Coronada Resources Ltd ., 2008 BCSC 692, and Polubinski v. Twardowski, 2007 BCSC 843. [43] Following the example of Master Young in Polubinski v. Twardowski, the chart below shows ......
  • Kakavelakis v. Boutsakis,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 23 Agosto 2021
    ...asking that orders be signed and trying to deal with costs are matters that, on the authority of Capital Resource v. Coronado Resources, 2008 BCSC 692, at para. 21, are recoverable under other tariff items and should not be awarded for tariff item [39]      ......
  • Huizenga v. Davidson et al., [2015] B.C.T.C. Uned. 266
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 23 Febrero 2015
    ...litigant for all work undertaken and for which compensation is not made elsewhere in the tariff: Capital Resource v. Coronado Resouces, 2008 BCSC 692. I have not had an opportunity to review the correspondence and emails and cannot, as a result, consider the purpose of these communications.......
4 cases
  • Brown v. Williams, 2019 BCSC 1187
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 19 Julio 2019
    ...litigant for all work undertaken and for which compensation is not made elsewhere in the tariff: Capital Resource v. Coronado Resouces, 2008 BCSC 692. I have not had an opportunity to review the correspondence and emails and cannot, as a result, consider the purpose of these communications.......
  • Goodwin v. Ofstie et al., [2009] B.C.T.C. Uned. 137
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 9 Febrero 2009
    ...of s. 9 is discussed and reflected in Brausse v. Young, [1992] B.C.J. No. 1015, Capital Resource Group Inc. v. Coronada Resources Ltd ., 2008 BCSC 692, and Polubinski v. Twardowski, 2007 BCSC 843. [43] Following the example of Master Young in Polubinski v. Twardowski, the chart below shows ......
  • Kakavelakis v. Boutsakis,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 23 Agosto 2021
    ...asking that orders be signed and trying to deal with costs are matters that, on the authority of Capital Resource v. Coronado Resources, 2008 BCSC 692, at para. 21, are recoverable under other tariff items and should not be awarded for tariff item [39]      ......
  • Huizenga v. Davidson et al., [2015] B.C.T.C. Uned. 266
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 23 Febrero 2015
    ...litigant for all work undertaken and for which compensation is not made elsewhere in the tariff: Capital Resource v. Coronado Resouces, 2008 BCSC 692. I have not had an opportunity to review the correspondence and emails and cannot, as a result, consider the purpose of these communications.......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT