Coronado Resources Ltd. et al. v. Chandler et al., [2008] B.C.T.C. Uned. 368 (SC Reg.)
Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
Case Date | May 30, 2008 |
Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
Citations | [2008] B.C.T.C. Uned. 368 (SC Reg.);2008 BCSC 692;[2008] B.C.T.C. Uned. 368 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 practice notes
-
Brown v. Williams, 2019 BCSC 1187
...litigant for all work undertaken and for which compensation is not made elsewhere in the tariff: Capital Resource v. Coronado Resouces, 2008 BCSC 692. I have not had an opportunity to review the correspondence and emails and cannot, as a result, consider the purpose of these communications.......
-
Goodwin v. Ofstie et al., [2009] B.C.T.C. Uned. 137
...of s. 9 is discussed and reflected in Brausse v. Young, [1992] B.C.J. No. 1015, Capital Resource Group Inc. v. Coronada Resources Ltd ., 2008 BCSC 692, and Polubinski v. Twardowski, 2007 BCSC 843. [43] Following the example of Master Young in Polubinski v. Twardowski, the chart below shows ......
-
Kakavelakis v. Boutsakis,
...asking that orders be signed and trying to deal with costs are matters that, on the authority of Capital Resource v. Coronado Resources, 2008 BCSC 692, at para. 21, are recoverable under other tariff items and should not be awarded for tariff item [39] ......
-
Huizenga v. Davidson et al., [2015] B.C.T.C. Uned. 266
...litigant for all work undertaken and for which compensation is not made elsewhere in the tariff: Capital Resource v. Coronado Resouces, 2008 BCSC 692. I have not had an opportunity to review the correspondence and emails and cannot, as a result, consider the purpose of these communications.......
4 cases
-
Brown v. Williams, 2019 BCSC 1187
...litigant for all work undertaken and for which compensation is not made elsewhere in the tariff: Capital Resource v. Coronado Resouces, 2008 BCSC 692. I have not had an opportunity to review the correspondence and emails and cannot, as a result, consider the purpose of these communications.......
-
Goodwin v. Ofstie et al., [2009] B.C.T.C. Uned. 137
...of s. 9 is discussed and reflected in Brausse v. Young, [1992] B.C.J. No. 1015, Capital Resource Group Inc. v. Coronada Resources Ltd ., 2008 BCSC 692, and Polubinski v. Twardowski, 2007 BCSC 843. [43] Following the example of Master Young in Polubinski v. Twardowski, the chart below shows ......
-
Kakavelakis v. Boutsakis,
...asking that orders be signed and trying to deal with costs are matters that, on the authority of Capital Resource v. Coronado Resources, 2008 BCSC 692, at para. 21, are recoverable under other tariff items and should not be awarded for tariff item [39] ......
-
Huizenga v. Davidson et al., [2015] B.C.T.C. Uned. 266
...litigant for all work undertaken and for which compensation is not made elsewhere in the tariff: Capital Resource v. Coronado Resouces, 2008 BCSC 692. I have not had an opportunity to review the correspondence and emails and cannot, as a result, consider the purpose of these communications.......