Corporation du Village de Ste. Anne-Du-Lac v. Hogue et al., 1958 CanLII 72 (SCC)

JudgeTaschereau, Robert; Rand, Ivan Cleveland; Fauteux, Joseph Honoré Gérald; Abbott, Douglas Charles; Judson, Wilfred
CourtSupreme Court of Canada
Case DateDecember 18, 1958
JurisdictionCanada (Federal)
Citations1958 CanLII 72 (SCC);16 DLR (2d) 241;[1959] SCR 43;[1959] SCR 53;1958 CanLII 11 (SCC);[1959] SCR 7;[1959] SCR 21;16 DLR (2d) 215;17 DLR (2d) 81;[1959] SCR 47;1958 CanLII 73 (SCC);[1959] SCR 58;[1959] SCR 10;16 DLR (2d) 161;1958 CanLII 13 (SCC);[1959] SCR 38;1958 CanLII 74 (SCC);[1958] SCJ No 69 (QL);1958 CanLII 12 (SCC);1958 CanLII 71 (SCC);1958 Ca
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
31 practice notes
  • Bangma Lewis et al. v. Bangma Estate et al., [2010] O.T.C. Uned. 878
    • Canada
    • Ontario Superior Court of Justice of Ontario
    • 9 February 2010
    ...of one's affairs. (c) Sexual abuse is a unique cause of action which requires unique treatment, but it is illogical to apply Sections 10 or 16 in actions against an estate. Such an interpretation would suggest that claims based on sexual assault would be subject to no limitation period what......
  • Mckeil Marine Limited v. Canada (Attorney General), 2016 FC 1063
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Federal Court
    • 20 September 2016
    ...provide the necessary adversarial context. One of the examples cited in Borowski is Vic Restaurant Inc v City of Montreal, [1959] SCR 58, 17 DLR (2d) 81. The restaurant, for which a renewal of a liquor licence had been sought, had been sold leaving the issue moot. There were however prosecu......
  • AFD Petroleum Ltd. v. Frac Shack Inc., 2018 FCA 140
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Federal Court of Appeal (Canada)
    • 20 July 2018
    ...which the controller is configured to log fuel requirements of each fuel tank being fueled. The fuel delivery system of any one of claims 1-10 or 16-29 further comprising a first pressure gauge at each fuel outlet upstream of the valve arrangement and a second pressure gauge at each fuel ou......
  • RENOVATING JUDICIAL REVIEW.
    • Canada
    • University of New Brunswick Law Journal Nbr. 68, January 2017
    • 1 January 2017
    ...Columbia (Labour Relations Board) v Traders Services Ltd, [1958] SCR 672, 15 DLR (2d) 305; Calgary Power v Copithome, [1959] SCR 24, 16 DLR (2d) 241; Kinnaird v British Columbia (Workmen's Compensation Board), [1963] SCR 239, 38 DLR (2d) 245; Quebec (Commission des Relations Ouvrieres) v Bu......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
30 cases
  • Bangma Lewis et al. v. Bangma Estate et al., [2010] O.T.C. Uned. 878
    • Canada
    • Ontario Superior Court of Justice of Ontario
    • 9 February 2010
    ...of one's affairs. (c) Sexual abuse is a unique cause of action which requires unique treatment, but it is illogical to apply Sections 10 or 16 in actions against an estate. Such an interpretation would suggest that claims based on sexual assault would be subject to no limitation period what......
  • Mckeil Marine Limited v. Canada (Attorney General), 2016 FC 1063
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Federal Court
    • 20 September 2016
    ...provide the necessary adversarial context. One of the examples cited in Borowski is Vic Restaurant Inc v City of Montreal, [1959] SCR 58, 17 DLR (2d) 81. The restaurant, for which a renewal of a liquor licence had been sought, had been sold leaving the issue moot. There were however prosecu......
  • AFD Petroleum Ltd. v. Frac Shack Inc., 2018 FCA 140
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Federal Court of Appeal (Canada)
    • 20 July 2018
    ...which the controller is configured to log fuel requirements of each fuel tank being fueled. The fuel delivery system of any one of claims 1-10 or 16-29 further comprising a first pressure gauge at each fuel outlet upstream of the valve arrangement and a second pressure gauge at each fuel ou......
  • Bk. of Mtrl. v. Southcombe, [2012] A.R. Uned. 51
    • Canada
    • Alberta Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta
    • 10 January 2012
    ...6 H.L. 377. (d) The representation must have induced the plaintiff to enter into the contract: Shortt v. MacLeannan , [1959] S.C.R. 3, 16 D.L.R. (2d) 161 [Ont.]. (e) The plaintiff must have acted promptly after learning of the misrepresentation to disaffirm the contract: Clough v. L.N.W. Ry......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • RENOVATING JUDICIAL REVIEW.
    • Canada
    • University of New Brunswick Law Journal Nbr. 68, January 2017
    • 1 January 2017
    ...Columbia (Labour Relations Board) v Traders Services Ltd, [1958] SCR 672, 15 DLR (2d) 305; Calgary Power v Copithome, [1959] SCR 24, 16 DLR (2d) 241; Kinnaird v British Columbia (Workmen's Compensation Board), [1963] SCR 239, 38 DLR (2d) 245; Quebec (Commission des Relations Ouvrieres) v Bu......