Cosentino v. Cosentino
| Jurisdiction | Alberta |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada) |
| Judge | Gates, J. |
| Citation | 2016 ABQB 331 |
| Date | 16 June 2016 |
| Subject Matter | FAMILY LAW,PRACTICE,CONFLICT OF LAWS |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
6 practice notes
-
ET v GT
...list of commonly considered factors regarding the forum conveniens although it remains open-ended. Cosentino v Cosentino, 2016 ABQB 331: 1. What is the habitual or ordinary residence of the child? Where has the family lived? Is the child presently located in Alberta? If so, how long has tha......
-
Sharma v Pal, 2022 ABQB 158
...and the relative strengths of the connections of the two parties”: Club Resort at para 110; also see Cosentino v Cosentino, 2016 ABQB 331 at para 14. [19]        The Court must refrain from instinctively favouring its own jurisdiction: Club Resort a......
-
Hasham v Kanji, 2020 ABQB 483
...A determination of forum conveniens is discretionary and highly fact specific: Cosentino v Cosentino, 2016 ABQB 331 at para 14, aff’d 2016 ABCA 377. Courts have set out factors to consider, 1.     the location and availability of witnesses; 2.   &#x......
-
Howard v Dzineku
...of the forum conveniens. See: ET v GT, 2018 ABPC 147 at para 3; Hasham v Kanji, 2020 ABQB 483 at para 41; Consentino v Consentino, 2016 ABQB 331 at para 15 I decline to undertake a determination of whether this Court should exercise or decline its jurisdiction until after the Mother has for......
Get Started for Free
6 cases
-
ET v GT
...list of commonly considered factors regarding the forum conveniens although it remains open-ended. Cosentino v Cosentino, 2016 ABQB 331: 1. What is the habitual or ordinary residence of the child? Where has the family lived? Is the child presently located in Alberta? If so, how long has tha......
-
Howard v Dzineku
...of the forum conveniens. See: ET v GT, 2018 ABPC 147 at para 3; Hasham v Kanji, 2020 ABQB 483 at para 41; Consentino v Consentino, 2016 ABQB 331 at para 17. [15] I decline to undertake a determination of whether this Court should exercis......
-
Sharma v Pal
...of judgments, and the relative strengths of the connections of the two parties”: Club Resort at para 110; also see Cosentino v Cosentino, 2016 ABQB 331 at para 14. [19] The Court must refrain from instinctively favouring its own jurisdiction: Club Resort at para 112. [20] In the context of ......
-
Hasham v Kanji
...[1993] 1 S.C.R. 897 (S.C.C.). [43] A determination of forum conveniens is discretionary and highly fact specific: Cosentino v Cosentino, 2016 ABQB 331 at para 14, aff’d 2016 ABCA 377. Courts have set out factors to consider, 1. the location and availability of witnesses; 2. the location whe......
Get Started for Free
