Cottrill v. Utopia Day Spas and Salons Ltd.
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Court | Court of Appeal (British Columbia) |
| Judge | Goepel,Savage,Fisher |
| Citation | 2019 BCCA 26 |
| Docket Number | CA44471 |
| Date | 24 January 2019 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
43 practice notes
-
Victory Motors (Abbotsford) Ltd. v. Actton Super-Save Gas Stations Ltd.
...reason to deprive it of its costs: 3464920 Canada Inc. v. Strother, 2010 BCCA 328 at para. 43; Cotrill v. Utopia Day Spas and Salons Ltd., 2019 BCCA 26 at para. 18. [162] Further, I am unconvinced that, looked at globally, Super-Save was the substantially successful party at trial. The tria......
-
Owen v. Folster
...[7] The principles guiding this factor were recently restated by the Court of Appeal in Cottrill v. Utopia Day Spas and Salons Ltd., 2019 BCCA 26 at paras. [29] Whether an offer to settle is one that ought reasonably to have been accepted is assessed not by reference to the award that was u......
-
Findlay v. George
...Rule, they are more likely to avoid the risk. [24] Those principles were recently restated in Cottrill v. Utopia Day Spas and Salons Ltd., 2019 BCCA 26, where beginning at para. 29 the Court stated as [29] Whether an offer to settle is one that ought reasonably to have been accepted is asse......
-
Nagy v. Csuka
...determine whether it was unreasonable to refuse it at the time the offer was open for acceptance: Cottrill v. Utopia Day Spas and Salons, 2019 BCCA 26 [Utopia Spas]. This factor is not determined by reference to the award ultimately made, but with reference to what was reasonable during the......
Get Started for Free
43 cases
-
Victory Motors (Abbotsford) Ltd. v. Actton Super-Save Gas Stations Ltd.
...reason to deprive it of its costs: 3464920 Canada Inc. v. Strother, 2010 BCCA 328 at para. 43; Cotrill v. Utopia Day Spas and Salons Ltd., 2019 BCCA 26 at para. 18. [162] Further, I am unconvinced that, looked at globally, Super-Save was the substantially successful party at trial. The tria......
-
Owen v. Folster
...[7] The principles guiding this factor were recently restated by the Court of Appeal in Cottrill v. Utopia Day Spas and Salons Ltd., 2019 BCCA 26 at paras. [29] Whether an offer to settle is one that ought reasonably to have been accepted is assessed not by reference to the award that was u......
-
Findlay v. George
...Rule, they are more likely to avoid the risk. [24] Those principles were recently restated in Cottrill v. Utopia Day Spas and Salons Ltd., 2019 BCCA 26, where beginning at para. 29 the Court stated as [29] Whether an offer to settle is one that ought reasonably to have been accepted is asse......
-
Nagy v. Csuka
...determine whether it was unreasonable to refuse it at the time the offer was open for acceptance: Cottrill v. Utopia Day Spas and Salons, 2019 BCCA 26 [Utopia Spas]. This factor is not determined by reference to the award ultimately made, but with reference to what was reasonable during the......
Get Started for Free