Coulombe v. Sabatier, [2006] A.R. Uned. 543

JudgeWatson, J.
CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
Citation[2006] A.R. Uned. 543,[2006] A.R. Uned. 543 (QB),2006 ABQB 618
Date17 August 2006

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
3 practice notes
  • Cochrane (Town) v Austech Holdings Inc, 2021 ABQB 666
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 20 Agosto 2021
    ...a party who was "misled by false, willfully incomplete, or non-existent accounting at material times": Coulombe v Sabatier, 2006 ABQB 618 at para [159]     The Applicants submit that the Plaintiffs cannot rely on the equitable principle of acquiescence because ......
  • Leverton v. Andrews et al., [2010] A.R. Uned. 586 (QB)
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 5 Agosto 2010
    ...of relative prejudice to the parties. [16] Decided more recently, and perhaps more on point, is the case of Coulombe v. Sabatier , 2006 ABQB 618, 66 Alta L.R. (4th) 17, where a plaintiff sought to have documents excluded on the basis that a large quantity of them had not been disclosed pre-......
  • Agricultural Law NetLetter - Tuesday, October 7, 2014 - Issue 309
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • 21 Octubre 2014
    ...may exist, even though the partners also run their own separate businesses, relying on the decision of Watson, J. in Coulombe v. Sabatier 2006 ABQB 618 In response to Erikson's argument that the partnership yielded no profit, and that if there was profit, it all went to Felker, was rejected......
2 cases
  • Cochrane (Town) v Austech Holdings Inc, 2021 ABQB 666
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 20 Agosto 2021
    ...a party who was "misled by false, willfully incomplete, or non-existent accounting at material times": Coulombe v Sabatier, 2006 ABQB 618 at para [159]     The Applicants submit that the Plaintiffs cannot rely on the equitable principle of acquiescence because ......
  • Leverton v. Andrews et al., [2010] A.R. Uned. 586 (QB)
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 5 Agosto 2010
    ...of relative prejudice to the parties. [16] Decided more recently, and perhaps more on point, is the case of Coulombe v. Sabatier , 2006 ABQB 618, 66 Alta L.R. (4th) 17, where a plaintiff sought to have documents excluded on the basis that a large quantity of them had not been disclosed pre-......
1 firm's commentaries
  • Agricultural Law NetLetter - Tuesday, October 7, 2014 - Issue 309
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • 21 Octubre 2014
    ...may exist, even though the partners also run their own separate businesses, relying on the decision of Watson, J. in Coulombe v. Sabatier 2006 ABQB 618 In response to Erikson's argument that the partnership yielded no profit, and that if there was profit, it all went to Felker, was rejected......