Creston Moly Corp. v. Sattva Capital Corp., [2014] N.R. TBEd. JL.020

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
JudgeMcLachlin, C.J.C., LeBel, Abella, Rothstein, Moldaver, Karakatsanis and Wagner, JJ.
Citation[2014] N.R. TBEd. JL.020,2014 SCC 53
CourtSupreme Court (Canada)
Date12 January 2007
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
2267 practice notes
  • Ledcor Construction Ltd. v. Northbridge Indemnity Insurance Co., 2016 SCC 37
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • 15 Septiembre 2016
    ...of a standard form contract should be recognized as an exception to the Court’s holding in Sattva Capital Corp. v. Creston Moly Corp., 2014 SCC 53, [2014] 2 S.C.R. 633, that contractual interpretation is a question of mixed fact and law subject to deferential review on appeal. The first rea......
  • Ontario (Attorney General) v. Restoule, 2024 SCC 27
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • 26 Julio 2024
    ...Metis Federation Inc. v. Canada (Attorney General), 2013 SCC 14 , [2013] 1 S.C.R. 623 ; Sattva Capital Corp. v. Creston Moly Corp., 2014 SCC 53, [2014] 2 S.C.R. 633 ; R. v. Sundown, [1999] 1 S.C.R. 393 ; Ontario (Attorney General) v. Bear Island Foundation, [1991] 2 S.C.R. 570 ; Wewayk......
  • Mosten Investments LP v The Manufacturers Life Insurance Company (Manulife Financial),, 2021 SKCA 36
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • 10 Marzo 2021
    ...the Judge, describe as the Sattva approach, in reference to that articulated by Rothstein J. in Sattva Capital Corp. v Creston Moly Corp., 2014 SCC 53, [2014] 2 SCR 633 [13] The law approaches the interpretation of an insurance contract differently than other types of contracts for severa......
  • Spina v. Shoppers Drug Mart Inc.,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 17 Febrero 2023
    ...Export Ltd v. Mutual Boiler & Machinery Insurance Co., [1980] 1 S.C.R. 888 . [111] Sattva Capital Corp. v. Creston Moly Corp., 2014 SCC 53; Canada Square Corp. v. VS Services Ltd. (1981), 34 O.R. (2d) 250 (C.A.);  Reardon Smith Line v. Hansen-Tangen, [1976] 3 All E.R. 570 (H.L......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1834 cases
  • Ledcor Construction Ltd. v. Northbridge Indemnity Insurance Co., 2016 SCC 37
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • 15 Septiembre 2016
    ...of a standard form contract should be recognized as an exception to the Court’s holding in Sattva Capital Corp. v. Creston Moly Corp., 2014 SCC 53, [2014] 2 S.C.R. 633, that contractual interpretation is a question of mixed fact and law subject to deferential review on appeal. The first rea......
  • Ontario (Attorney General) v. Restoule, 2024 SCC 27
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • 26 Julio 2024
    ...Metis Federation Inc. v. Canada (Attorney General), 2013 SCC 14 , [2013] 1 S.C.R. 623 ; Sattva Capital Corp. v. Creston Moly Corp., 2014 SCC 53, [2014] 2 S.C.R. 633 ; R. v. Sundown, [1999] 1 S.C.R. 393 ; Ontario (Attorney General) v. Bear Island Foundation, [1991] 2 S.C.R. 570 ; Wewayk......
  • Mosten Investments LP v The Manufacturers Life Insurance Company (Manulife Financial),, 2021 SKCA 36
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • 10 Marzo 2021
    ...the Judge, describe as the Sattva approach, in reference to that articulated by Rothstein J. in Sattva Capital Corp. v Creston Moly Corp., 2014 SCC 53, [2014] 2 SCR 633 [13] The law approaches the interpretation of an insurance contract differently than other types of contracts for severa......
  • Spina v. Shoppers Drug Mart Inc.,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 17 Febrero 2023
    ...Export Ltd v. Mutual Boiler & Machinery Insurance Co., [1980] 1 S.C.R. 888 . [111] Sattva Capital Corp. v. Creston Moly Corp., 2014 SCC 53; Canada Square Corp. v. VS Services Ltd. (1981), 34 O.R. (2d) 250 (C.A.);  Reardon Smith Line v. Hansen-Tangen, [1976] 3 All E.R. 570 (H.L......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
332 firm's commentaries
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (January 24-28, 2022)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • 1 Febrero 2022
    ...v. Bellman , 2022 ONCA 61 Keywords: Contracts, Interpretation, Debtor-Creditor, Guarantees, Sattva Capital Corp. v. Creston Moly Corp., 2014 SCC 53, King v. Operating Engineers Training Institute of Manitoba Inc., 2011 MBCA 80 , Heritage Capital Corp. v. Equitable Trust Co., 2016 SCC 19......
  • COURT OF APPEAL SUMMARIES (FEBRUARY 17 – FEBRUARY 21, 2020)
    • Canada
    • LexBlog Canada
    • 22 Febrero 2020
    ...Mining Rights, Joint Venture Agreements, 798839 Ontario Ltd. v. Platt, 2016 ONCA 488 , Sattva Capital Corp. v. Creston Moly Corp., 2014 SCC 53, Richcraft Homes Ltd. v. Urbandale Corporation, 2016 ONCA 622 The Energy Credit Union Limited v. Radwan , 2020 ONCA 136 Keywords: Contracts, Re......
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (June 20 ' 24, 2022)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • 27 Junio 2022
    ...Catalyst Capital Group Inc. v. Dundee Kilmer Developments Limited Partnership, 2020 ONCA 272, Sattva Capital Corp. v. Creston Moly Corp., 2014 SCC 53, Ontario Public Service Employees Union v. Ontario (2005), 13 C.P.C. (6th) 178 (Ont. S.C.), Nelson (City) v. Marchi, 2021 SCC 41, Francis v. ......
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (March 28, 2022 ' April 1, 2022)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • 6 Abril 2022
    ...Sale by Description, Exclusion Clauses, Sale of Goods Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. S.1, ss 14 and 53, Sattva Capital Corp. v. Creston Moly Corp., 2014 SCC 53, Bakker v. Bowness Auto Parts Co. (1976), 68 D.L.R. (3d) 173 (Alta. S.C. (A.D.)), Ashington Piggeries Ltd. v. Christopher Hill Ltd., [1972] A......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
59 books & journal articles
  • Digest: Input Capital Corp. v Gustafson, 2018 SKQB 154
    • Canada
    • Saskatchewan Law Society Case Digests
    • 18 Mayo 2018
    ...Ltd., 1994 CanLII 963, [1994] 8 WWR 185 Sagon v Royal Bank of Canada (1992), 105 Sask R 133 Sattva Capital Corp. v Creston Moly Corp., 2014 SCC 53, [2014] 2 SCR 633 Singh v Trump, 2016 ONCA 747 Tran v Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2017 SCC 50, [2017] 2 SCR 289 Van De Ge......
  • Introduction
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Canadian Class Action Review No. 17-1, August 2021
    • 1 Agosto 2021
    ...In summary, the present judicial approach for interpreting a release is as follows: 6 Creston Moly Corp v Sattva Capital Corp, 2014 SCC 53 at para 47 [Sattva Capital]. 7 See Bhasin v Hrynew, 2014 SCC 71 at para 45 and CM Callow Inc v Zollinger, 2020 SCC 45 at para 44. The organizing princip......
  • Book Review: Class Actions in Privacy Law
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Canadian Class Action Review No. 17-1, August 2021
    • 1 Agosto 2021
    ...In summary, the present judicial approach for interpreting a release is as follows: 6 Creston Moly Corp v Sattva Capital Corp, 2014 SCC 53 at para 47 [Sattva Capital]. 7 See Bhasin v Hrynew, 2014 SCC 71 at para 45 and CM Callow Inc v Zollinger, 2020 SCC 45 at para 44. The organizing princip......
  • Addressing Systemic Abuse in Quebec Long-term Care Homes: The Class Action Solution
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Canadian Class Action Review No. 17-1, August 2021
    • 1 Agosto 2021
    ...In summary, the present judicial approach for interpreting a release is as follows: 6 Creston Moly Corp v Sattva Capital Corp, 2014 SCC 53 at para 47 [Sattva Capital]. 7 See Bhasin v Hrynew, 2014 SCC 71 at para 45 and CM Callow Inc v Zollinger, 2020 SCC 45 at para 44. The organizing princip......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT