Crookes v. Newton
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Supreme Court (Canada) |
| Judge | McLachlin, Beverley; Binnie, William Ian Corneil; LeBel, Louis; Deschamps, Marie; Fish, Morris J.; Abella, Rosalie Silberman; Charron, Louise; Rothstein, Marshall; Cromwell, Thomas Albert |
| Citation | [2011] 3 SCR 269,2011 SCC 47,87 CCLT (3d) 1,[2011] CarswellBC 2627,[2011] ACS no 47,[2011] SCJ No 47 (QL),96 CPR (4th) 115,[2011] EXP 3133,206 ACWS (3d) 640,337 DLR (4th) 1,JE 2011-1751,248 CRR (2d) 310,[2011] 11 WWR 633,22 BCLR (5th) 1,310 BCAC 76,421 NR 205 |
| Date | 19 October 2011 |
| Docket Number | 33412 |
| Subject Matter | LIBEL AND SLANDER |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
35 practice notes
-
Bent v. Platnick
...v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235; Hryniak v. Mauldin, 2014 SCC 7, [2014] 1 S.C.R. 87; Crookes v. Newton, 2011 SCC 47, [2011] 3 S.C.R. 269; Breeden v. Black, 2012 SCC 19, [2012] 1 S.C.R. 666; Platnick v. Bent (No. 2), 2016 ONSC 7474; Palmer v. The Queen, [1980] 1 S.C.R. 759; R......
-
Hansman v. Neufeld
...and Aerospace Workers, 2012 BCSC 181; Barrick Gold Corp. v. Lopehandia (2004), 71 O.R. (3d) 416; Crookes v. Newton, 2011 SCC 47, [2011] 3 S.C.R. 269; Pineau v. KMI Publishing and Events Ltd., 2022 BCCA 426; Irwin Toy Ltd. v. Quebec (Attorney General), [1989] 1 S.C.R. 927; R. v. Zundel, [199......
-
Mainstream Canada v. Staniford
...Manock, [2007] H.C.A. 60, refd to. [para 26]. Kemsley v. Foot, [1952] A.C. 345 (H.L.), refd to. [para. 27]. Crookes et al. v. Newton, [2011] 3 S.C.R. 269; 421 N.R. 205; 310 B.C.A.C. 76; 526 W.A.C. 76; 2011 SCC 47, refd to. [para. Pallos v. Insurance Corp. of British Columbia, [1995] 3 W.W.R......
-
Banro Corp. v. Éditions Écosociété Inc. et al.
...Van Breda et al. v. Village Resorts Ltd. et al. (2012), 429 N.R. 217; 2012 SCC 17, appld. [para. 2]. Crookes et al. v. Newton, [2011] 3 S.C.R. 269; 421 N.R. 205; 310 B.C.A.C. 76; 526 W.A.C. 76; 2011 SCC 47, refd to. [para. Van Breda et al. v. Village Resorts Ltd. et al. (2010), 264 O.A.C. 1......
Get Started for Free
30 cases
-
Haaretz.com v. Goldhar
...v. Village Resorts Ltd., 2010 ONCA 84, 98 O.R. (3d) 721; Hunt v. T&N plc, [1993] 4 S.C.R. 289; Crookes v. Newton, 2011 SCC 47, [2011] 3 S.C.R. 269; Crookes v. Holloway, 2007 BCSC 1325, 75 B.C.L.R. (4th) 316, aff’d 2008 BCCA 165, 77 B.C.L.R. (4th) 201; Barrick Gold Corp. v. Blanchard &am......
-
Hansman v. Neufeld
...and Aerospace Workers, 2012 BCSC 181; Barrick Gold Corp. v. Lopehandia (2004), 71 O.R. (3d) 416; Crookes v. Newton, 2011 SCC 47, [2011] 3 S.C.R. 269; Pineau v. KMI Publishing and Events Ltd., 2022 BCCA 426; Irwin Toy Ltd. v. Quebec (Attorney General), [1989] 1 S.C.R. 927; R. v. Zundel, [199......
-
Bent v. Platnick
...v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235; Hryniak v. Mauldin, 2014 SCC 7, [2014] 1 S.C.R. 87; Crookes v. Newton, 2011 SCC 47, [2011] 3 S.C.R. 269; Breeden v. Black, 2012 SCC 19, [2012] 1 S.C.R. 666; Platnick v. Bent (No. 2), 2016 ONSC 7474; Palmer v. The Queen, [1980] 1 S.C.R. 759; R......
-
Mainstream Canada v. Staniford
...Manock, [2007] H.C.A. 60, refd to. [para 26]. Kemsley v. Foot, [1952] A.C. 345 (H.L.), refd to. [para. 27]. Crookes et al. v. Newton, [2011] 3 S.C.R. 269; 421 N.R. 205; 310 B.C.A.C. 76; 526 W.A.C. 76; 2011 SCC 47, refd to. [para. Pallos v. Insurance Corp. of British Columbia, [1995] 3 W.W.R......
Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
-
Office Christmas Parties And Social Media: When The Friends Of My Friends
Are Not My Friends!
...the entire year. Footnotes 1 Société Radio-Canada v. Radio Sept-Îles Inc., J.E. 94-1286 (C.A.), p. 14 2 Id., p. 15 3 Crookes v. Newton [2011] 3 S.C.R. 269, par. 4 See, for example, Canada Post Corp. v. Canadian Union of Postal Workers, [2012] C.L.A.D. no. 85, par. 108. The content of this a......
2 books & journal articles
-
Table of Cases
...Kerman (24 April 2008 BCSC) 326 Kerman v Kerman (30 June 2008 BCSC) 304 Kerr v Baranow (2012 BCSC) 53 Kerr v Baranow and Vanasse v Seguin (2011 SCC) 47, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 328, 329, 330, 700, 703 Kerr v Erland 510 Kerr v Hauer 589, 677, 683 Kerr v Kerr (2005 NSSC) 288 Kerr v Kerr (2005 Ont......
-
Law as an ally or enemy in the war on cyberbullying: exploring the contested terrain of privacy and other legal concepts in the age of technology and social media.
...may be liable for what their kids post on Facebook, Court rules", The Wall Street Journal (15 October 2014). (94) Crookes v Newton, 2011 SCC47 at para 1, citing Grant v Torstar Corp, 2009 SCC 61, 3 SCR 640. (95) Hill v Church of Scientology of Toronto, [1995] 2 SCR 1130 (96) Crookes v Newto......
