Crowder v. British Columbia (Attorney General), 2019 BCSC 1824

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
JudgeHinkson
Citation2019 BCSC 1824
Date24 October 2019
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Docket NumberS194533
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
13 practice notes
  • British Columbia (Attorney General) v Le,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • May 17, 2023
    ...costs in motor vehicle damage claims reached the Supreme Court of British Columbia in Crowder v. British Columbia (Attorney General) 2019 BCSC 1824. (The reasons were released in October 2019.) The facts of Crowder were somewhat similar to those of the case at bar. The Province had enacted ......
  • M.T. v. J.S., 2020 BCSC 1604
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • October 29, 2020
    ...accords with the Court’s inherent and general jurisdiction as a superior court: Crowder v. British Columbia (Attorney General), 2019 BCSC 1824, paras. 130–134; Reznik v. Matty, 2013 BCSC 1346, paras. 18–27; I.H. Jacob, “The Inherent Jurisdiction of the Court ......
  • Lewis v. Worth, 2020 BCSC 57
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • January 17, 2020
    ...168/2009. Portions of Rule 11-8 were held to be unconstitutional in late October 2019 in Crowder v. British Columbia (Attorney General), 2019 BCSC 1824. The plaintiff argues that was too near trial to allow her to obtain and serve an opinion quantifying the doctors’ [89] Leaving aside wheth......
  • Trial Lawyers Association of British Columbia v. British Columbia (Attorney General),
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • March 2, 2021
    ...tendered in motor vehicle actions in Supreme Court was found to be unconstitutional in Crowder v. British Columbia (Attorney General), 2019 BCSC 1824. The plaintiffs contend that when combined with the privative clause in s. 56.7 of the CRTA, the result denudes the court of its power to mea......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
7 cases
  • British Columbia (Attorney General) v Le,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • May 17, 2023
    ...costs in motor vehicle damage claims reached the Supreme Court of British Columbia in Crowder v. British Columbia (Attorney General) 2019 BCSC 1824. (The reasons were released in October 2019.) The facts of Crowder were somewhat similar to those of the case at bar. The Province had enacted ......
  • M.T. v. J.S., 2020 BCSC 1604
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • October 29, 2020
    ...accords with the Court’s inherent and general jurisdiction as a superior court: Crowder v. British Columbia (Attorney General), 2019 BCSC 1824, paras. 130–134; Reznik v. Matty, 2013 BCSC 1346, paras. 18–27; I.H. Jacob, “The Inherent Jurisdiction of the Court ......
  • Lewis v. Worth, 2020 BCSC 57
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • January 17, 2020
    ...168/2009. Portions of Rule 11-8 were held to be unconstitutional in late October 2019 in Crowder v. British Columbia (Attorney General), 2019 BCSC 1824. The plaintiff argues that was too near trial to allow her to obtain and serve an opinion quantifying the doctors’ [89] Leaving aside wheth......
  • Trial Lawyers Association of British Columbia v. British Columbia (Attorney General),
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • March 2, 2021
    ...tendered in motor vehicle actions in Supreme Court was found to be unconstitutional in Crowder v. British Columbia (Attorney General), 2019 BCSC 1824. The plaintiffs contend that when combined with the privative clause in s. 56.7 of the CRTA, the result denudes the court of its power to mea......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
6 firm's commentaries
  • Court Finds Limiting Expert Reports Unconstitutional
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • November 7, 2019
    ...Rule 11-8 limiting the number of expert reports on motor vehicle actions. In brief, in Crowder v. British Columbia (Attorney General), 2019 BCSC 1824, Chief Justice Hinkson declared the rule changes (Rule 11-8) limiting the number of experts in motor vehicle litigation to three experts to b......
  • Bill 9 Changes To Expert Reports And Disbursements
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • September 1, 2020
    ...11-8 was successfully challenged by the plaintiff's personal injury bar. In the decision Crowder v. British Columbia (Attorney General), 2019 BCSC 1824., 11-8 was found unconstitutional because, as BC Supreme Court Chief Justice Christopher Hinkson wrote: "I find that the impugned rule infr......
  • Limits On Expert Reports In BC Overturned
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • November 13, 2019
    ...to stabilize the loss to $50 million this fiscal year, ending March 31. In the decision Crowder v. British Columbia (Attorney General), 2019 BCSC 1824, the petitioner, Gregory Crowder, who was rear-ended by a tractor trailer in 2017, argued that the limit on medical reports made it impossib......
  • Case Study – Gregory Crowder And Trial Lawyers Association Of British Columbia v. Attorney General Of British Columbia, 2019 BCSC 1824
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • November 7, 2019
    ...injury actions after February 1, 2020. In the recent reasons for judgment in the case of Crowder v. British Columbia (Attorney General), 2019 BCSC 1824, Chief Justice Hinkson has declared Rule 11-8 unconstitutional and of no force or In Crowder, the petitioners, Mr. Crowder, a claimant in a......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT