Cultivate Capital Corp. v. 1011173 B.C. Ltd.
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Judge | Honourable Mr. Justice Armstrong |
| Neutral Citation | 2021 BCSC 1258 |
| Citation | 2021 BCSC 1258 |
| Date | 28 June 2021 |
| Docket Number | S1811730 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
4 practice notes
-
1011173 B.C. Ltd. v. Hakemi & Ridgedale LLP
...claim for return of the $1 million loan was decided in a summary trial application - see Cultivate Capital Corp. v. 1011173 B.C. Ltd., 2021 BCSC 1258. The clients describe the outcome as [28]        The clients also raise complaints regarding the GTEC liti......
-
Lee v UpMeals Technologies Inc.
...must occur within a reasonable amount of time to give the contract commercial effect. In Cultivate Capital Corp. v. 1011173 B.C. Ltd., 2021 BCSC 1258 at para. 72–73 Justice Armstrong noted that a loan that is repayable on a contingent event become payable on demand if the event does not occ......
-
Horizon Capital Holdings Inc. v GeoTility Systems Corporation
...a contract cannot be considered part of the evidence of surrounding circumstances: Cultivate Capital Corp. v. 1011173 B.C. Ltd., 2021 BCSC 1258 at para. 57. Throughout prolonged negotiations, parties' positions change and their interests are divergent until final agreements are achieved; th......
-
Is Signing On The Line Really Final?
...2021 ONCA 691 at paras 6-14. 14 1346134 Ontario Limited v. Wright, 2023 ONCA 307. 15 Cultivate Capital Corp. v. 1011173 B.C. Ltd., 2021 BCSC 1258. 16 Ontario First Nations (2008) Limited Partnership v. Ontario Lottery and Gaming Corporation, 2021 ONCA 17 RS Distribution Services Ltd. v. MTS......
6 cases
-
1011173 B.C. Ltd. v. Hakemi & Ridgedale LLP
...claim for return of the $1 million loan was decided in a summary trial application - see Cultivate Capital Corp. v. 1011173 B.C. Ltd., 2021 BCSC 1258. The clients describe the outcome as [28]        The clients also raise complaints regarding the GTEC liti......
-
2024 BCSC 997
...timeline may also depend on other circumstances and terms of an agreement. For instance, in Cultivate Capital Corp. v 1011173 B.C. Ltd., 2021 BCSC 1258, the plaintiff had made the same argument based on China Dragon that a loan was due on demand: at para. 71. While the court did find the lo......
-
2024 BCSC 888
...must occur within a reasonable amount of time to give the contract commercial effect. In Cultivate Capital Corp. v. 1011173 B.C. Ltd., 2021 BCSC 1258 at para. 72–73 Justice Armstrong noted that a loan that is repayable on a contingent event become payable on demand if the event does not occ......
-
Lee v UpMeals Technologies Inc.
...must occur within a reasonable amount of time to give the contract commercial effect. In Cultivate Capital Corp. v. 1011173 B.C. Ltd., 2021 BCSC 1258 at para. 72–73 Justice Armstrong noted that a loan that is repayable on a contingent event become payable on demand if the event does not occ......
Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
-
Is Signing On The Line Really Final?
...2021 ONCA 691 at paras 6-14. 14 1346134 Ontario Limited v. Wright, 2023 ONCA 307. 15 Cultivate Capital Corp. v. 1011173 B.C. Ltd., 2021 BCSC 1258. 16 Ontario First Nations (2008) Limited Partnership v. Ontario Lottery and Gaming Corporation, 2021 ONCA 17 RS Distribution Services Ltd. v. MTS......
