Curtis v. Curtis, 2019 ONSC 1527

JudgeRaikes
CourtSuperior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
Case DateMarch 07, 2019
JurisdictionOntario
Citations2019 ONSC 1527
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
3 practice notes
  • Khan v. Coloma, 2019 ONSC 7202
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • December 11, 2019
    ...in this case. [34]           The applicant relies on the case of Curtis v. Curtis, 2019 ONSC 1527, 303 A.C.W.S. (3d) 347, at paras. 22-25 in which Rule 1.04 was applied, in conjunction with Rule 66, to justify the court’s jurisdiction......
  • Re Deyell,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • August 17, 2021
    ...to an order for distribution in accordance with the title holding, which is subject to the Court’s discretion: Curtis v. Curtis, 2019 ONSC 1527, 303 A.C.W. (3d) 347, at para. 41. [81]        Comtech argues that the exercise of discretion requires a ......
  • Mammolit v Smutniak,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • November 16, 2022
    ...and give the appropriate court resources to this issue (Rule 2).   44.  Justice Raikes in the decision of Curtis v. Curtis, 2019 ONSC 1527, at para. 41, deals with the disbursement of funds under Rule 66.03 and states: “In my view, the principles that apply to whether to or......
3 cases
  • Khan v. Coloma, 2019 ONSC 7202
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • December 11, 2019
    ...in this case. [34]           The applicant relies on the case of Curtis v. Curtis, 2019 ONSC 1527, 303 A.C.W.S. (3d) 347, at paras. 22-25 in which Rule 1.04 was applied, in conjunction with Rule 66, to justify the court’s jurisdiction......
  • Re Deyell,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • August 17, 2021
    ...to an order for distribution in accordance with the title holding, which is subject to the Court’s discretion: Curtis v. Curtis, 2019 ONSC 1527, 303 A.C.W. (3d) 347, at para. 41. [81]        Comtech argues that the exercise of discretion requires a ......
  • Mammolit v Smutniak,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • November 16, 2022
    ...and give the appropriate court resources to this issue (Rule 2).   44.  Justice Raikes in the decision of Curtis v. Curtis, 2019 ONSC 1527, at para. 41, deals with the disbursement of funds under Rule 66.03 and states: “In my view, the principles that apply to whether to or......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT