Cuthbertson v. Rasouli,
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Judge | McLachlin, Beverley; LeBel, Louis; Fish, Morris J.; Abella, Rosalie Silberman; Rothstein, Marshall; Cromwell, Thomas Albert; Karakatsanis, Andromache |
| Citation | [2013] 3 SCR 341,2013 SCC 53,46 Alta LR (2d) 161,364 DLR (4th) 195 |
| Docket Number | 34362 |
| Court | Supreme Court (Canada) |
| Date | 18 October 2013 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
28 practice notes
-
Capital Steel Inc v Chandos Construction Ltd, 2019 ABCA 32
...presumption that the Legislature must be taken to have known the pre-existing law”). [387] Cuthbertson v. Rasouli, 2013 SCC 53, ¶18; [2013] 3 S.C.R. 341, 356 (“The Common Law Backdrop”) & 2747-3174 Québec Inc. v. Quebec, [1996] 3 S.C.R. 919, 972 per L'Heureux-Dubé, J. (the common law is......
-
Glamorgan Landing Estates GP Inc. v Calgary (City),
...in its ordinary sense. A judge may waive fees for the very poor, and no one else”); Cuthbertson v. Rasouli, 2013 SCC 53, ¶ 44; [2013] 3 S.C.R. 341, 365 per McLachlin, C.J. (“Reading the words of the statute in their ordinary sense and in their context, and having regard to the objects and s......
-
Notes
...responsible for their conduct. 15 See, for example, R v Appulonappa , 2015 SCC 59 at para 34. 16 SO 1996, c 2, Sched A. 17 2013 SCC 53, [2013] 3 SCR 341. 18 Ibid at para 50. 19 Ibid at para 155. 20 See, for example, the Accessible Canada Act , SC 2019, c 10, s 5: 5 he purpose of this Act is......
-
Deluca v. Alberta (Law Enforcement Review Board), 2018 ABCA 340
...[1926] S.C.R. 246, 267 (a court must always consider the object of the statute); Cuthbertson v. Rasouli, 2013 SCC 53, ¶ 32; [2013] 3 S.C.R. 341, 361-62 (“The basic rule of statutory interpretation is that the ‘words of an Act are to be read in their entire context, in their grammatical and ......
Get Started for Free
20 cases
-
Glamorgan Landing Estates GP Inc. v Calgary (City),
...in its ordinary sense. A judge may waive fees for the very poor, and no one else”); Cuthbertson v. Rasouli, 2013 SCC 53, ¶ 44; [2013] 3 S.C.R. 341, 365 per McLachlin, C.J. (“Reading the words of the statute in their ordinary sense and in their context, and having regard to the objects and s......
-
Capital Steel Inc v Chandos Construction Ltd, 2019 ABCA 32
...presumption that the Legislature must be taken to have known the pre-existing law”). [387] Cuthbertson v. Rasouli, 2013 SCC 53, ¶18; [2013] 3 S.C.R. 341, 356 (“The Common Law Backdrop”) & 2747-3174 Québec Inc. v. Quebec, [1996] 3 S.C.R. 919, 972 per L'Heureux-Dubé, J. (the common law is......
-
Deluca v. Alberta (Law Enforcement Review Board), 2018 ABCA 340
...[1926] S.C.R. 246, 267 (a court must always consider the object of the statute); Cuthbertson v. Rasouli, 2013 SCC 53, ¶ 32; [2013] 3 S.C.R. 341, 361-62 (“The basic rule of statutory interpretation is that the ‘words of an Act are to be read in their entire context, in their grammatical and ......
-
R. v. By (B.H.), (2015) 470 Sask.R. 185 (QB)
...437 N.R. 1; 324 N.S.R.(2d) 1; 1029 A.P.R. 1; 2012 SCC 66, refd to. [para. 49]. Rasouli v. Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre et al., [2013] 3 S.C.R. 341; 449 N.R. 313; 310 O.A.C. 19; 2013 SCC 53, refd to. [para. 54]. Cuthbertson v. Rasouli - see Rasouli v. Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre e......
Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
-
CCB Rules No Jurisdiction Where Patient Declared Brain Dead
...28, 2016) and Re EI (released September 30, 2016) 2 Re UH at page 8. 3 Ibid. at page 10. 4 Re EI at page 9. 5 Cuthbertson v. Rasouli,[2013] S.C.C. 53. About The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about you......
5 books & journal articles
-
Notes
...responsible for their conduct. 15 See, for example, R v Appulonappa , 2015 SCC 59 at para 34. 16 SO 1996, c 2, Sched A. 17 2013 SCC 53, [2013] 3 SCR 341. 18 Ibid at para 50. 19 Ibid at para 155. 20 See, for example, the Accessible Canada Act , SC 2019, c 10, s 5: 5 he purpose of this Act is......
-
Fiduciary duties, conflict of interest, and proper exercise of judgment.
... ... , 13 DLR (4th) 321; Lac Minerals Ltd v International Corona Resources Ltd, [1989] 2 SCR 574 at 597, 648, 61 DLR (4th) 14 [Lac Minerals]; Cuthbertson v Rasouli, 2013 SCC 53 at para 193, [2013] 3 SCR 341; Ernest J Weinrib, 'The Fiduciary Obligation" (1975) 25:1 UTLJ 1 at 7). The context-driven ... ...
-
Writing Reasons: A Handbook for Judges, 4th ed.
...since the 17th century). (5) Berry, supra note 1 at 22. (6) Ibid at 23. (7) Ibid. (8) Cuthbertson v Rasouli, 2013 SCC 53 at para 1, [2013] 3 SCR 341. (9) See Berry, supra note 1 at 3-8 (describing focus first writing as involving "the addition of a context at the outset that will clarify th......
-
Understanding Fiduciary Duties And Relationship Fiduciarity.
... ... acknowledged and accepted that there is no outermost limit on the number or type of relations that may be described as fiduciary: see Cuthbertson v Rasouli, 2013 SCC 53 at para 193, [2013] 3 SCR 341; Western Canadian Shopping Centres Inc v Dutton, 2001 SCC 46 at para 55, [2001] 2 SCR 534; ... ...
Get Started for Free