D.L.W. v. H.A.D., [2015] A.R. Uned. 104 (CA)

CourtCourt of Appeal (Alberta)
Case DateJune 17, 2015
Citations[2015] A.R. Uned. 104 (CA);2015 ABCA 203;[2015] A.R. Uned. 104
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
5 practice notes
  • AA v JA, 2017 ABQB 19
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • May 19, 2017
    ...with the parent in whose “primary care” the child has been since birth: Milton v Letch, 2013 ABCA 248 at paras 14 and 15. In DLW v HAD, 2015 ABCA 203, Justice Topolniski’s Special Application reasons were quoted and her findings were upheld. She is quoted at para 3:“A key consideration in t......
  • Mezo v Watts, 2021 ABCA 76
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • March 1, 2021
    ...where one parent has historically assumed a greater role in caring for the child, thereby failing to follow the decision in DLW v HAD, 2015 ABCA 203. Test for Permission to Appeal [10]        An appeal from a decision of a Court of Queen’s Bench jud......
  • Caine v. Burris, 2016 ABQB 126
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • February 24, 2016
    ...Chambers Applications on the basis of affidavit evidence: Heikel v Heikel , 2007 ABQB 378, Rawlins J at paras 27 and 28; DLW v HAD , 2015 ABCA 203. [8] The question is whether a mobility application may be decided yet farther from the procedural rigours of trial at the stage of a Chambers a......
  • RAO v SDO, 2020 ABQB 506
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • September 1, 2020
    ...and is to be encouraged: Sandhu v Siri Guru Nanak Sikh Gurdwara of Alberta, 2015 ABCA 101 at paras 79-81. [100] See also DLW v HAD, 2015 ABCA 203 at paras 5 and 7 and, of course, more generally, Hryniak v Maudlin, 2014 SCC [101] In this case, I note the following: · It was not argued on beh......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
  • AA v JA, 2017 ABQB 19
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • May 19, 2017
    ...with the parent in whose “primary care” the child has been since birth: Milton v Letch, 2013 ABCA 248 at paras 14 and 15. In DLW v HAD, 2015 ABCA 203, Justice Topolniski’s Special Application reasons were quoted and her findings were upheld. She is quoted at para 3:“A key consideration in t......
  • Mezo v Watts, 2021 ABCA 76
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • March 1, 2021
    ...where one parent has historically assumed a greater role in caring for the child, thereby failing to follow the decision in DLW v HAD, 2015 ABCA 203. Test for Permission to Appeal [10]        An appeal from a decision of a Court of Queen’s Bench jud......
  • Caine v. Burris, 2016 ABQB 126
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • February 24, 2016
    ...Chambers Applications on the basis of affidavit evidence: Heikel v Heikel , 2007 ABQB 378, Rawlins J at paras 27 and 28; DLW v HAD , 2015 ABCA 203. [8] The question is whether a mobility application may be decided yet farther from the procedural rigours of trial at the stage of a Chambers a......
  • RAO v SDO, 2020 ABQB 506
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • September 1, 2020
    ...and is to be encouraged: Sandhu v Siri Guru Nanak Sikh Gurdwara of Alberta, 2015 ABCA 101 at paras 79-81. [100] See also DLW v HAD, 2015 ABCA 203 at paras 5 and 7 and, of course, more generally, Hryniak v Maudlin, 2014 SCC [101] In this case, I note the following: · It was not argued on beh......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT