Dakota Ojibway Child and Family Services v. M.B.H. et al., 2018 MBQB 142

JurisdictionManitoba
JudgeDUECK J.
Citation2018 MBQB 142
Date28 August 2018
CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of Manitoba (Canada)
Docket NumberCP 07-01-11217 (Winnipeg Centre)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
2 practice notes
  • Dakota Ojibway Child and Family Services et al v MBH, 2019 MBCA 91
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Manitoba)
    • September 6, 2019
    ...section 75(2) of The Child and Family Services Act, CCSM c C80). On appeal from Dakota Ojibway Child and Family Services v MBH et al, 2018 MBQB 142 BURNETT JA Introduction [1] The respondent appeals an order granting summary judgment and appointing the petitioner (the Agency) as the permane......
  • Child and Family Services of Western Manitoba et al v LAN, 2019 MBCA 92
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Manitoba)
    • September 6, 2019
    ...the appeal hearing, the Agency relied upon the lower Court’s decision in MBH (see Dakota Ojibway Child and Family Services v MBH et al, 2018 MBQB 142); and r 70.02.1(2) of the Queen’s Bench Rules, which Proportionality 70.02.1(2) Securing the just, most expeditious and least expensive deter......
2 cases
  • Dakota Ojibway Child and Family Services et al v MBH, 2019 MBCA 91
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Manitoba)
    • September 6, 2019
    ...section 75(2) of The Child and Family Services Act, CCSM c C80). On appeal from Dakota Ojibway Child and Family Services v MBH et al, 2018 MBQB 142 BURNETT JA Introduction [1] The respondent appeals an order granting summary judgment and appointing the petitioner (the Agency) as the permane......
  • Child and Family Services of Western Manitoba et al v LAN, 2019 MBCA 92
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Manitoba)
    • September 6, 2019
    ...the appeal hearing, the Agency relied upon the lower Court’s decision in MBH (see Dakota Ojibway Child and Family Services v MBH et al, 2018 MBQB 142); and r 70.02.1(2) of the Queen’s Bench Rules, which Proportionality 70.02.1(2) Securing the just, most expeditious and least expensive deter......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT